General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBerlum
(7,044 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Seems both parties were quite eager to chew bodies and drink blood.
zerosumgame0005
(207 posts)Bill Clinton was "quite eager to chew bodies and drink blood"? prove it
Al Franken was "quite eager to chew bodies and drink blood"? prove it
who are you trying smear?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)A majority of Democrats in both chambers voted YES on the invasion. This was years prior to Franken being elected, but Biden voted yes, Hillary Clinton voted yes, all of Obama's Secs of Defense were both Republicans and war supporters. Had more Democrats voted NO, war could have been halted, instead the Yes voting Democrats have all been promoted and the NO voters shunned for being too smart, wise and courageous for DC.
roody
(10,849 posts)when did they show the blood-lust you claim they showed?
Whisp
(24,096 posts)why do people have amnesia about this?
zerosumgame0005
(207 posts)Daddy Bush's "no fly zones"?
Whisp
(24,096 posts)but don't mention That! Clinton's are only about Peace and Loooooove.
zerosumgame0005
(207 posts)we put sanctions on lots of places, the only reason anyone died was SH.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)kill tens of thousands of kids and blame it on Sadam.
He made me do it!
thucythucy
(8,043 posts)stoking the war fever, and without Republicans willing to target anyone against it (including a triple amputee war hero like Max Cleland) as "soft on terrorism," and without the Cheney/Rumsfeld axis doctoring the intelligence, I doubt it would have happened.
Not to mention, I can't picture Al Gore getting a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike inside US" and deciding, in response, to go on another vacation. Or deciding, in response to an attack plotted in Aghanistan, and undertaken by Saudis and Egyptians, to invade Iraq.
My recollection is Al Gore was out quite early opposing the war.
So yeah, for all these reasons, I'd call it a Republican War.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Because they weren't stupid, and knew exactly how it would play. However, the aircraft carrier's mission had been accomplished, and the captain wanted to congratulate the crew.
Also, in the interest of preserving things from the memory hole, Bush's "mission accomplished" speech was several months later; on the aircraft carrier he didn't use those words and in fact talked about the need to do more in Iraq.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)lump them in on an equal basis with the Republicans when it comes to war mongering seems totally without any objective basis. (From the Bush administrations forward.)
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Although the Democrats were cowed because of 9/11/2001, it was launched and lobbied exclusively by Republicans and the idiots who continue to vote for them as well as the enablers who have allowed it to happen because they believe that "there's no difference between Al Gore and Bush".
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)40% of House Democrats voted for it; 60% of Senate Democrats voted for it. An "aye" was whipped (albeit mildly) by the leadership in both chambers.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)roody
(10,849 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)True.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)to change and shape the middle east into something that could be profited from. There was even a conservative group that had mapped this all out long before it happened. I forget the name.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)GOP initiated, Democratic enabled.