Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Fri May 17, 2013, 09:53 AM May 2013

Understanding Poe's Law 4 you alll

Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the idea that without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.


Poe's law, in broader form, is:

Without a blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of extremism or fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing



Another precedent posted on Usenet dates to 2001. Following the well-known schema of Arthur Clarke's Third law,




Alan Morgan wrote:

"Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine kook."

Some on DU are aware of this law, some are masters of the law and some illustrate Poe's Law.


OK...... continue your postings and searches on the Web.... This class is over.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Understanding Poe's Law 4 you alll (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter May 2013 OP
Is it The Onion, or is it Louie Gohmert? Buns_of_Fire May 2013 #1
Ok, now you've got me confused. A lettle help please........ wandy May 2013 #2

wandy

(3,539 posts)
2. Ok, now you've got me confused. A lettle help please........
Fri May 17, 2013, 10:56 AM
May 2013

Is Rush Limbaugh a blow hard or is he the head of the republican party?
Does The Onion produce comedy or do they document the planks of the republican platform?
Does Andy Borowitz write satire or the congressional record?
The republican party shows no intentional blatant display of humor, so are they an extremist group or a parody of a governing body?
I ask this in light of the republican Houses 37 attempt to repeal ACA. I'm not sure if should laugh or get out the torches and pitchforks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Understanding Poe's Law 4...