Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Krugman has discovered, these last few years, is that ideas that should be dead can live on...
Meanwhile, its been fun, over the last decade or two, to watch Paul Krugman be radicalized by his opponents. This is a longtime globalization advocate who was hired, by the Times, presumably to write a column based mainly on economics, along the lines of his old Slate columns where hed explain Japan with ticket scalping analogies and so on. Instead they got this angry fulminating liberal truth-crusader.
And this wonderful new Krugman even occasionally sounds very slightly like Doug Henwood. From his NYRB essay:
Yesterday, he approvingly cited Naomi Klein. The significance of that cant quite be overstated, if you, in the words of BuzzFeed, Remember the 90s. Krugman was (is!) a globalization advocate mainstream economist. Klein is one of the foremost voices of the 90s anti-globalization movement. It turns out they can share a side of the great American political divide without driving each other crazy:
What Krugman has discovered, these last few years, is that ideas that should be dead can live on forever when the right people, like Michael Kinsley, believe in them. And the right people continue to believe in austerity.
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/kinsley_loves_austerity_because_it_is_spinach/
And this wonderful new Krugman even occasionally sounds very slightly like Doug Henwood. From his NYRB essay:
So is the austerian impulse all a matter of psychology? No, theres also a fair bit of self-interest involved. As many observers have noted, the turn away from fiscal and monetary stimulus can be interpreted, if you like, as giving creditors priority over workers.
Yesterday, he approvingly cited Naomi Klein. The significance of that cant quite be overstated, if you, in the words of BuzzFeed, Remember the 90s. Krugman was (is!) a globalization advocate mainstream economist. Klein is one of the foremost voices of the 90s anti-globalization movement. It turns out they can share a side of the great American political divide without driving each other crazy:
What [Noah] Smith didnt note, somewhat surprisingly, is that his argument is very close to Naomi Kleins Shock Doctrine, with its argument that elites systematically exploit disasters to push through neoliberal policies even if these policies are essentially irrelevant to the sources of disaster. I have to admit that I was predisposed to dislike Kleins book when it came out, probably out of professional turf-defending and whatever but her thesis really helps explain a lot about whats going on in Europe in particular.
What Krugman has discovered, these last few years, is that ideas that should be dead can live on forever when the right people, like Michael Kinsley, believe in them. And the right people continue to believe in austerity.
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/kinsley_loves_austerity_because_it_is_spinach/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 886 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Krugman has discovered, these last few years, is that ideas that should be dead can live on... (Original Post)
phantom power
May 2013
OP
Laelth
(32,017 posts)1. k&r for exposure. n/t
-Laelth
CTyankee
(63,900 posts)2. the odd thing is how Kinsley proves Krugman's point. I can't help wondering if Kinsley's
Parkinson disease has affected his thinking. I wonder, because otherwise, why does Kinsley do exactly as Krugman describes?
BootinUp
(47,136 posts)3. Excellent column. nt