Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,358 posts)
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:19 PM May 2013

Republican Drive to Block Cabinet Picks May Spur Change to Senate Rules

NY Times:

The escalating Senate fight over President Obama’s cabinet appointments moved closer to a showdown on Thursday as two nominees headed to their confirmation votes without a single Republican’s support.

Gina McCarthy, Mr. Obama’s choice to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, and Thomas E. Perez, the nominee to be secretary of labor, were approved in committee with only Democratic votes. Their nominations now go before the full Senate, where they face likely Republican filibusters.

The threat of further Republican attempts to thwart the president’s ability to assemble his second-term cabinet has increased the likelihood of a fight over the Senate’s rules, which allow the minority party to insist on a 60-vote threshold for almost every Senate action.

Democrats say that Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, in recent days has been trying to gauge whether there is sufficient support among Democrats to force a rule change that would limit the filibuster on presidential nominees. He could conceivably try to enact a rule change with a simple majority — a tactic known as “the nuclear option.” Any revisions to Senate rules usually require 67 votes, a threshold that is impossible to obtain without significant Republican support.


I was in a meeting this week with someone in a position to know, and this is definitely in play.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
4. I realize this could be a problem should the Democrats lose the majority in the Senate but
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:50 PM
May 2013

Currently nothing is happening in Congress. For a group of people who are supposed to govern it seems like this is the last thing on their minds. They only work 1/3 of the year and some even miss some of those days. How many more delaying tactics do they want to create. They complain a budget hasn't been passed, well, who should we look to see why not.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
11. No. This time he really, really means it.
Fri May 17, 2013, 08:15 PM
May 2013

The asshole. Is there any wonder why we are in trouble with DINO's like dipshit Harry Reid. I bet he polishes McConnell's shoes.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. I'll believe it when I see it
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:58 PM
May 2013

Reid had every chance to change the filibuster rules, and we see where that went.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
8. Sick of hearing the MSM daily recite right-wing talking points trashing the Administration
Fri May 17, 2013, 05:31 PM
May 2013

over frivolous or trumped up charges while ignoring right-wing obstruction of governmental operations.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
9. Surrrre this time Lucy (Harry) wont pull the football (filibuster reform) out when poor
Fri May 17, 2013, 08:12 PM
May 2013

ole Charlie Brown (the 99%) go to kick it.

Harry Reid is a dirty rotten liar. He and his Democratic Senator accomplices are complicit with the Rethugs.

Keeping the filibuster lets them off the hook. They can vote Democratic and blame the Rethugs for the failures.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
12. Milquetoast Mumblemouth, Esq. will huff & puff and then do nothing
Fri May 17, 2013, 08:19 PM
May 2013

as per usual..

This should have been the order of the day on the FIRST DAY of Obama's first "congress".. Who knows? we might have gotten single payer, true election reform, closure of Guantanamo, and so much more..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republican Drive to Block...