Message auto-removed

[Name removed]

[zappaman]

1. Natural news is the source????

Can you say "bullshit"?

[Tree-Hugger]

2. Natural News?

Any other source than Natural News? They keep the tinfoil companies in business...

[Tree-Hugger]

12. That's not the issue

The issue is this new conspiracy theory that Angelina removed both breasts in order to coincide with the hearing and trump up some PR.

Nice try, though.

[Tree-Hugger]

18. God Bless You

That's all I can say.

Good luck.

[hobbit709]

4. you signed up just to post this caca de vaca?

[hobbit709]

22. Natural News is total taurine metabolic byproducts.

got any more woo you want me to believe?

[cui bono]

5. What's the bombshell? I don't get it. n/t

[zappaman]

8. The bombshell is that someone actually came on DU to cite Natural News.

[cui bono]

15. So you think someone whose looks play a large part in her career

would purposely have a double mastectomy in order to advertise for a company? Don't you think she could have just used her professional abilities and acted in a commercial? How much did she get paid to go through this surgery?

omg.

[cui bono]

25. OMG! You're right! Let's demand a topless nude photo from her IMMEDIATELY!!!

You're scaring me.

[Ptah]

30. Welcome.

plant-eater
19. Um...maybe she never got the surgery!

[MichiganVote]

7. I think that's a pretty sick idea and the item you cite has no evidence

of merit supporting a connection between Ms. Jolie's choice and this form of breast cancer detection.

[villager]

16. Yes they are:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/15/genes-patents-supreme-court-breast-cancer-ovarian/2084335/

[MichiganVote]

28. Only person fishy-ing here is you.

[Warren DeMontague]

13. ZOMG IT'S A MONSANTO-TECTOMY

[Tree-Hugger]

26. I don't want to alarm anyone, but...

Her breasts probably worked for HAARP and spewed chem-trails. And, where were her breasts when Benghazi happened?

[djean111]

20. No matter what the impetus was for her surgery - this gives knowlegeand hope to those

women whose families have a high incidence of breast cancer.
Profits? How much does cancer treatment - chemo, x-rays, wildly expensive drugs - cost? If anything, the test and the double mastectomy may be less expensive, which tells cynical old me that Big Pharma may not be happy about this.

[Robb]

23. I'm willing to bet you'd hoped this would go better.