Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
1. Seems a little self-serving:
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:02 AM
May 2013

A member of the media claiming that the only real scandal is the one impacting the media.

He may be right, but it comes across as disingenuous.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
3. And WHY would we assume media are the best ones to do the right thing by the info. People
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:24 AM
May 2013

do the wrong thing "for your own good" ALL of the time.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. Do you trust the Government to be the best ones to do the right thing
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:41 AM
May 2013

by the people, though? Doesn't history show that Governments don't always have the common person in mind when big money, powerful interests gain a foothold as they have now with the Military/Industry/and much of "Corporate" Media embedded with them. It's important that the Press be taken back from the influence of the Powerful Interests. And, that's why Freedom of Speech without fear of retribution is important.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
6. Government is at least theoretically accountable and if it isn't there are some things that we
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:51 AM
May 2013

actually have recourse to in order to mitigate their dysfunctions, bureaucratic or otherwise.

NOT so with private entities; we have no right, other than commercial boycott, to require that private entities do or don't do anything with their data-resources.

Private entities also have narrower domains than governments, so their decisions about what to do with information resources can be affected either by their own ignorance or by other, more or less, intentionally latent/covert agendas.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
2. All true, SO, I honestly don't understand what we are to do about leaks that can/do result in CIA
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:16 AM
May 2013

safe-houses being ID'd and there's possibly another problem: what about leaks that amount to "industrial espionage" against other leaks? Is it possible that some leaks, for whatever they accomplish in the immediate proximity of an issue, also amount to a head-ups for bigger game to say or execute prophylactic measures?

Leakage must be chaotic. That means that value CAN be lost.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
4. Very short term others are inportant
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:28 AM
May 2013

See Benghazi scandal and data manipulation and ABC.

As I said the other day, the AP is just the First Amendment and American citizens shoud have head on fire over it...it's not just a free press in it.

I completely lost my hopes that people will comprehend why this one matters...a lot more, at a meta, granular level

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
7. +1 Just finished watching. Great piece! The video rolled over into an...
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:57 AM
May 2013

...excellent piece on a disabled veteran who was robbed out of his home by Wells Fargo and an organization which is combating these kinds of things by buying underwater homeowners' houses and reselling it back to them with affordable financing. Keeping sustainable communities and neighborhoods thriving when banks are trying to destroy them.



PB

patrice

(47,992 posts)
8. Why aren't we talking about how Benghazi could have lead to Shock & Awe 2.0 if some handlers
Sat May 18, 2013, 11:57 AM
May 2013

had had their way with the information?

Sorry! Media and media whores (NOT Chris Hayes, btw) have already proven their trustworthiness with that kind of information.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Hey Liberals, Listen Up!...