Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun May 19, 2013, 03:35 PM May 2013

AP CEO: Sources Are Reluctant To Talk After Phone Records Probe

By Daniel Politi | Posted Sunday, May 19, 2013, at 2:25 PM

The President and CEO of the Associated Press told CBS News that the Justice Department’s seizure of phone records was “unconstitutional” and has hurt the agency’s ability to report on the news. It’s not that the government doesn’t have the right to seize phone records, Gary Pruitt said, but the methodology was “so sweeping, so secretively, so abusively and harassingly overbroad" that it violated the Constitution.

While investigating the source of a leak that led to a story about a failed terror plot in Yemen, the Justice Department "issued a secret subpoena for the phone toll records for 21 AP phone lines and these were phones lines for reporters, direct lines, cell phones, home phones but also the office numbers," Pruitt said. The Justice Department is required to make its request as narrowly as possible. Plus, it should have informed the AP first, although it claimed an exception to that rule saying it would threaten the investigation. “But they have not explained why it would and we can't understand why it would."

Now AP reporters are having trouble getting sources to talk. "Officials that would normally talk to us, and people we talk to in the normal course of news gathering, are already saying they're a little reluctant to talk to us,” Pruitt said. “They fear that they will be monitored by the government."

###

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/05/19/gary_pruitt_ap_ceo_calls_phone_records_probe_unconstitutional.html?wpisrc=newsletter_jcr:content

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
4. I'd care if I thought they, the AP & media in general were effective.
Sun May 19, 2013, 04:00 PM
May 2013

Does this mean those poor babies like John Karl might have to actually go work on a story now? That is, rather than just waiting for a GOP staffer to call them with BS.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
5. AP is nothing but tabloid junk now.
Sun May 19, 2013, 04:03 PM
May 2013

Who would talk to them except people who've been abducted by aliens? Unless they fire Karl. As long as they stand by him they're gambling their reputation on his. That's not only a bad bet, it's a stupid one since everybody already knows he didn't actually see the original emails even though he said he did. That's what's called a lie.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
6. There is plenty of interesting information out there that isn't classified.
Sun May 19, 2013, 04:05 PM
May 2013

It doesn't all have to be scoops, leaks, gossip, rumors and speculation from anonymous sources.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AP CEO: Sources Are Reluc...