Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:47 AM Feb 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Are_grits_groceries) on Thu Feb 9, 2012, 06:33 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 OP
nobody ever throw a snowball ever again eShirl Feb 2012 #1
People have been convicted of throwing deadly missiles at cars, which were snowballs jberryhill Feb 2012 #22
I can't believe people think thrown snowballs deserve prison time Occulus Feb 2012 #29
So, if you hit someone's windshield with a snowball.. jberryhill Feb 2012 #32
Thanks to the new NDAA and the Government's ability to define things. Confetti would be consider Justice wanted Feb 2012 #2
Oh, that's not a problem! stillwaiting Feb 2012 #7
Your right. Perfectly same to call something that when it is thrown FLOATS and not slams into Justice wanted Feb 2012 #9
Better reconsider throwing that rice at your next wedding... hlthe2b Feb 2012 #3
Hmmmm.... call me crazy soc7 Feb 2012 #4
I didn't say he shouldn't be punished. Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 #5
"faces" six months. Broderick Feb 2012 #6
Glitter being equated with a missile won't stand up to court scrutiny. no_hypocrisy Feb 2012 #8
Try reading the statute and a dictionary jberryhill Feb 2012 #13
On its face, the definition may in fact be applicable, but no_hypocrisy Feb 2012 #15
It is ancient, and from common law battery jberryhill Feb 2012 #18
A missile is not synonymous with an object. The purpose of the object makes it a missile. no_hypocrisy Feb 2012 #24
A burrito is a "deadly missile" jberryhill Feb 2012 #25
Understood and appreciated. no_hypocrisy Feb 2012 #27
One consents to the throwing of confetti at parties and rice at weddings jberryhill Feb 2012 #28
"education is limited"???? So right to the personal insults. Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 #16
Throwing things at people is juvenile jberryhill Feb 2012 #17
Hope you enjoy the low road! Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 #19
Oooohhh... I have "fellow travelers" jberryhill Feb 2012 #23
Never said that. Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 #26
You have a right to think that, and that's OK by me... Capitalocracy Feb 2012 #20
Just popped into my head: IF we had this happening when Bush was President...I wonder what they Justice wanted Feb 2012 #10
The guy who threw the shoe got three years jberryhill Feb 2012 #14
In an Iraqi prison! Hawkowl Feb 2012 #31
You understand that the point of "civil disobedience" is to get arrested, right? jberryhill Feb 2012 #33
Sort of... Hawkowl Feb 2012 #34
Romney laughed if off afterward. Obviously, this was a real act of terror. n/t Ian David Feb 2012 #11
I think his punishment should be to face a firing squad... of GLITTER! n/t Ian David Feb 2012 #12
He and Romney should settle it mano a mano in the Glitterdome. Capitalocracy Feb 2012 #21
Next time use a real missile fired from a UAV gratuitous Feb 2012 #30
"If a commoner called the cops on me for throwing glitter at them, the pigs would laugh Jon Ace Feb 2012 #35

eShirl

(20,259 posts)
1. nobody ever throw a snowball ever again
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:21 AM
Feb 2012
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
22. People have been convicted of throwing deadly missiles at cars, which were snowballs
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:29 AM
Feb 2012

I can't fucking believe that people can't wrap their heads around the notion that it is not okay to throw things at others who have not consented to it.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/college/felony-snowball-tossing-busts
Felony Snowball Tossing Busts

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
29. I can't believe people think thrown snowballs deserve prison time
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:22 PM
Feb 2012
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
32. So, if you hit someone's windshield with a snowball..
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 04:01 PM
Feb 2012

...they lose visibility, crash the car and die, then it's all good.

Likewise permanently damaging someone's vision by getting glitter in their eye and scratching a cornea.

Or do you think it only counts if that actually happens?

RFK was shot to death in a crowded hotel convention facility. Distracting security assigned to a presidential candidate provides an opportunity for the candidate to get shot by someone else while security is going after someone who thinks throwing things at people is some kind of political discourse.

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)
2. Thanks to the new NDAA and the Government's ability to define things. Confetti would be consider
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:31 AM
Feb 2012

carpet bombing if Glitter is now considered a missle. BUT what the EFFIN hell are they going to do when it comes to the conventions and all those balloons and confetti start dropping.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
7. Oh, that's not a problem!
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:40 AM
Feb 2012

The government can drop missiles and carpet bombs whenever they feel like it and on whoever they feel like it without any ramifications.

It is us, we the people, that can't drop missiles (glitter - ) and carpet bombs (confetti - ) without going to jail.

That is perfectly sane. Perfectly sane.

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)
9. Your right. Perfectly same to call something that when it is thrown FLOATS and not slams into
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:43 AM
Feb 2012

another body as a missle.


hlthe2b

(113,973 posts)
3. Better reconsider throwing that rice at your next wedding...
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:42 AM
Feb 2012
This is ridiculous.
 

soc7

(53 posts)
4. Hmmmm.... call me crazy
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 07:50 AM
Feb 2012

But, I'm thinking that heaving something at any presidential candidate is probably not such a great idea....

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)
5. I didn't say he shouldn't be punished.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:32 AM
Feb 2012

I do believe that finding the harshest punishment and making the crime fit it perverts justice.

Broderick

(4,578 posts)
6. "faces" six months.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:39 AM
Feb 2012

Doubt he will get that much time.

no_hypocrisy

(54,908 posts)
8. Glitter being equated with a missile won't stand up to court scrutiny.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:42 AM
Feb 2012

The physical qualities and effects of the impact of a missile aren't there.

Let me put it this way: if it were a civil lawsuit instead of a criminal prosecution, the glitter would be a technical "battery" where something made contact with a person. The "impact" would be negligilble like blowing cigar or cigarette smoke at someone, save for a possible complication of the glitter getting in an eye and causing discomfort or infection at the worst.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
13. Try reading the statute and a dictionary
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 09:10 AM
Feb 2012

A "missile" is any thrown object.

Simply because your education is limited does not change the fact that it is illegal to throw things at people.

no_hypocrisy

(54,908 posts)
15. On its face, the definition may in fact be applicable, but
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 09:28 AM
Feb 2012

I'd want to see how prior courts have interpreted what a "missile" is. That's the definition that carries.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
18. It is ancient, and from common law battery
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:14 AM
Feb 2012

Ask any first year torts student.

no_hypocrisy

(54,908 posts)
24. A missile is not synonymous with an object. The purpose of the object makes it a missile.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:36 AM
Feb 2012

The Macmillan Dicitionary defines a missile as a weapon.

The definition of a weapon is "an object that can be used to hurt people or damage property, for example a gun, knife, or bomb."
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/weapon

I maintain that glitter is not a missile as it can't injure or kill like a true weapon can.

A court can do one of two things when deciding whether glitter is a missile or not: Either adopt the strict meaning that it's an object thrown or projected or parse the definition to exclude objects that are practically harmless notwithstanding they can be thrown at a person.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
25. A burrito is a "deadly missile"
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:41 AM
Feb 2012
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/armed-deadly-burrito
Armed With A Deadly Burrito
Felony charge for teen who tossed Mexican "missile" at car

----

You want to believe throwing shit at people is okay, you go right on believing.

By all means, act like a fucking child.

no_hypocrisy

(54,908 posts)
27. Understood and appreciated.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:07 PM
Feb 2012

And that's one court's interpretation of the definition of the word "missile". It isn't ubiquitous for all courts. My contention is to see how the court in this particular case will interpret glitter.

And yes, conceded that stuff shouldn't be thrown at people in general, save for traditions of confetti, rice at a wedding, etc.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
28. One consents to the throwing of confetti at parties and rice at weddings
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:16 PM
Feb 2012

I sincerely doubt that any court is going to see the act of throwing something, anything, at another person who cannot be understood to have given any consent - particularly when the point of the act is based upon such non-consent - as anything other than some form of assault (or the relevant statutory category of the state in question).

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)
16. "education is limited"???? So right to the personal insults.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 09:48 AM
Feb 2012

That was unnecessary and did nothing to add to the discussion. From previous posts I have read, I believe you are quite capable of disagreeing in a manner that doesn't resort to this kind of attack.

Of course, if you choose to scuttle along the low road, that is your prerogative. It does not reflect well on you.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
17. Throwing things at people is juvenile
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:10 AM
Feb 2012

I have no problem whatsoever insulting the intelligence, education and character of people who think throwing things at people is an acceptable way to make a point.

Period.

I honestly don't give a shit how it reflects on me.

You want to support assault as a form of political discourse, that's fine.

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)
19. Hope you enjoy the low road!
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:15 AM
Feb 2012

Not a very good view from there, and your fellow travelers are a suspect bunch. In addition, you will have to throw your vitriol upwards which guantees some will land back on you.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
23. Oooohhh... I have "fellow travelers"
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:32 AM
Feb 2012

Well you just go on thinking you can throw things at people.

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)
26. Never said that.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:47 AM
Feb 2012

Never said there should be no punishment.
I'm out. Argue with yourself.

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
20. You have a right to think that, and that's OK by me...
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:19 AM
Feb 2012

but regardless of how juvenile or stupid or ineffective or counterproductive you might think it is, it still doesn't make sense to sentence a person who threw glitter as if they threw a rock.

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)
10. Just popped into my head: IF we had this happening when Bush was President...I wonder what they
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:45 AM
Feb 2012

would have called the shoes that where thrown at W?


After all Glitter is a missle and Confetti is a carpet bombing....Just saying...

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
14. The guy who threw the shoe got three years
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 09:11 AM
Feb 2012
 

Hawkowl

(5,213 posts)
31. In an Iraqi prison!
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:27 PM
Feb 2012

Quite a price to pay for an act of civil disobedience. He is a national hero, as he should be.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
33. You understand that the point of "civil disobedience" is to get arrested, right?
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 04:02 PM
Feb 2012
 

Hawkowl

(5,213 posts)
34. Sort of...
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 04:23 PM
Feb 2012

The point of civil disobedience is to effect change. The getting arrested is the means to an end.

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
11. Romney laughed if off afterward. Obviously, this was a real act of terror. n/t
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:53 AM
Feb 2012

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
12. I think his punishment should be to face a firing squad... of GLITTER! n/t
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 08:54 AM
Feb 2012

Capitalocracy

(4,307 posts)
21. He and Romney should settle it mano a mano in the Glitterdome.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 10:21 AM
Feb 2012

Two men enter, one man leaves! And then the other man leaves. Covered in glitter.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
30. Next time use a real missile fired from a UAV
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 01:26 PM
Feb 2012

They'll pin a medal on your chest for that. Just be sure to say afterwards that the decedent was some kind of "militant" or "terrorist," which is as good as "He's comin' right at us!" for conferring legal immunity.

Jon Ace

(255 posts)
35. "If a commoner called the cops on me for throwing glitter at them, the pigs would laugh
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 04:37 PM
Feb 2012

and probably not even show up.

But if you throw glitter at Mr. $200 Million, well, that's just terrorism."


- sickpharaoh, reddit.com

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...