A thought for Friday(even though it's Tuesday)-Will Mitt Romney go for it again?

[graham4anything]

I had thought he would have disappeared back into the biz world, make billions more and forget about politics.

But like a true egotist who has blamed everyone but himself, I think he might attempt another go round

And would in an instant take the VP if it were offered with Jeb(or vice versa would give Jeb the VP)

whatcha think?

This is normally a weekend type thread, but well, thought of it today so that is why I titled it as did.

[The Link]

1. Sounds like some alt media flim flam.

Romney is dead and buried.

[graham4anything]

4. So was the Bush name after w, yet Jeb is now #1 in the polls (by margin of error).

[Bluenorthwest]

7. Jeb is NOT leading the GOP polls...Rubio is. Read the polling at this link...

This is a list of nation-wide public opinion polls that have been conducted relating to the Republican primaries for the 2016 United States presidential election. The persons named in the polls are either declared candidates, former candidates or have received media speculation about their possible candidacy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_Republican_Party_2016_presidential_primaries


Jeb does not lead in even one nationwide poll thus far....

[graham4anything]

11. Yes, he is AS I SAID within the margin of error. Rubio is not going to run and can't be VP for Jeb

unless one of them moves as both live in Florida at this juncture in time.

[Bluenorthwest]

13. Most of those are not within the margin of error either, dude. In some, Jeb is beating by more than

just Rubio, also Christie. You claim he is 'leading in the polls' when he does not lead in even one single poll. That is dishonest. At that link you and anyone else can see the margin of error, the percentage for all candidates, etc. What you are saying is simply not correct.

[graham4anything]

14. This thread is about Mitt. Please don't divert it to a circular argument.

[Bluenorthwest]

15. Thread about 2016, you introduced Jeb as subject claiming he leads the polls and that is not the

case, it is something you promote here regularly, so I posted the actual polling results, which do not show Jeb leading, margin or no margin in most cases, Rubio in fact leads in all but one, Christie leads in that one. Jeb gets lower numbers than Rubio in all polls, lower than the margin of error in several.
Jeb Bush leads in no national poll, not one. This is statement of fact. The circular reasoning is your own, you make a false statement, repeat it, and when it is shown to be false you want the subject changed.
Jeb does not lead in the polls. None of them. Not 80, not 20. Zero.

[graham4anything]

18. since you are hounding me here is the poll I saw- 4 way tie with Jeb plus 3 from last one, as said

Rubio dropping Jeb gaining and Paul isn't going to be the nominee. Not with his racial John Birch society views.
They won't let Rand or Ron anywhere near. Rand isn't fooling anyone.


http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/05/4-way-tie-for-republicans-clinton-leads-dems.html#more

4 way tie for Republicans, Clinton leads Dems



PPP's monthly look at the 2016 Republican field for President finds essentially a 4 way tie at the top- Marco Rubio has 16%, Jeb Bush and Chris Christie 15% each, and Rand Paul 14%. Paul Ryan at 9%, Ted Cruz at 7%, Rick Santorum at 5%, Bobby Jindal at 3%, and Susana Martinez at 1% round out the potential candidates we tested.

It's now been almost 6 months since we started doing regular polling of the 2016 race. The only candidate who's shown any real momentum over that period of time is Paul, whose support has doubled from 7% to 14%. Rubio's shift from 18% to 16%, Bush's from 12% to 15%, and Christie's from 14 to 15% are all within the margin of error. It is worth noting though that this is the first time Rubio hasn't held at least a 4 point lead over the other Republican contenders.

[asjr]

2. Since his ego is bigger than his

brain he just might do it.

[el_bryanto]

3. Unlikely

I think he'll go back to the private sector. I think his ego will tell him "They don't deserve you anyway" rather than "You should run again."

Bryant

[Puzzledtraveller]

5. I see one of three options for them

Do they stick with a loser, and not just Romney but others like him or do they veer hard right? I think they will veer hard right and take a gamble. Look for Rand Paul, Rubio, perhaps Cruz. Of course there is a chance they play a soft middle and you may get Christie with a conservative VP pick.

[Bluenorthwest]

6. What the fuck is a 'weekend type thread'? You have 'types' of threads for certain days?

What are the metrics you use to determine such things?

[pinboy3niner]

17. Underwear says 'Friday' on the front and 'Weekend Thread Time' on the back

[Dpm12]

8. I sure hope not

I's a hates Mitt-suh Romney

[Aristus]

9. I don't think Queen Anne will let him.

She clearly disliked the rough-and-tumble sphere of national campaigning.

[nolabear]

10. Not unless he pays for it himself.

There comes a point where mass delusion collapses, and he reached that one.

[ChoppinBroccoli]

12. Flashback 4 Years

At this time 4 years ago, everyone said Sarah Palin was a lock to win the Republican nomination.

I say if the Republicans want to keep looking backward and selecting losers from the past.............LET THEM.

[Fumesucker]

16. Mitt wants to kill Big Bird

He will never recover from that, Big Bird is beloved by several generations of Americans.

Letting Rmoney be Rmoney in the first debate was a brilliant move on Obama's part, Napoleon said never to interrupt the enemy while he is destroying himself.