Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:21 AM May 2013

Urban Class Warfare: Are Cities Built for the Rich?

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/marxist-and-geographer-david-harvey-on-urban-development-and-power-a-900976.html


According to Gerull, the trend in cities is to increasing commercialization, with the result that market forces determine how they develop.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why should a Marxist be concerned about major cities instead of the working class these days?

Harvey : Traditional Marxists admittedly see the avant-garde of the revolution in the industrial working class. However, since this is disappearing in the wake of Western deindustrialization, people are starting to grasp that urban conflicts will probably be decisive.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Over the course of the debt crisis, wages have decreased and social benefits have been slashed in Greece. Meanwhile, general strikes haven't generated enough pressure to reverse the changes. Can this be viewed as evidence to support your theory that the traditional proletariat can no longer paralyze a state?

Harvey : Yes. Today's working class is part of a wider configuration of classes in which the struggle centers on the city itself. I replace the traditional concept of class struggle with the struggle of all those who produce and reproduce urban life. Unions must look at the urban everyday existence -- a key for the social conflicts to come. In the United States, for example, this has prompted the AFL-CIO federation of labor organizations to start collaborating with domestic workers and migrants.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
1. Yes. New York with the 85 story building for the 1%
Tue May 21, 2013, 10:47 AM
May 2013

Santa Monica California with several huge tower buildings with luxury condos for the 1% in planning stages. Rents show no signs of going down in the big cities.

It's a trend for sure.

gopiscrap

(23,724 posts)
2. It's becoming more and more like that
Tue May 21, 2013, 01:40 PM
May 2013

my family couldn't afford to live in the place I was born downtown Frankfurt, Germany) under today's economic conditions.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
3. This is not a trend it started in the 60s
Tue May 21, 2013, 01:49 PM
May 2013

manufacturing left cities so fast that buildings stood empty till the Trumpudites did their tape worm moves.

Remember that loft was once a place where people worked .

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
8. How do you explain the ability of an equally poor immigrant group to turn around slum neighborhood?
Tue May 21, 2013, 03:39 PM
May 2013
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
9. i explain it by the fact that they are not 'equally poor'. and if you look into the details of
Tue May 21, 2013, 03:57 PM
May 2013

those supposed 'turnarounds,' you'll find that is the case.

behind the little horatio alger stories is *capital*.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
7. +1. It's growing increasingly impossible to live well
Tue May 21, 2013, 03:34 PM
May 2013

on a typical income in every major US city.

Wasn't it just yesterday someone posted the story that suburbs have more poor people as a percentage of population than inner cities today?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Urban Class Warfare: Are ...