Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Tue May 21, 2013, 12:55 PM May 2013

WIKILEAKS PROSECUTOR ACCEPTS Manning's PLEA TO 1 COUNT

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) -- Prosecutors say they will accept an Army private's guilty plea to a lesser version of one of the 22 counts he faces.

Maj. Ashden Fein said Tuesday that prosecutors had changed their minds about trying to convict Pfc. Bradley Manning with violating the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in connection with the release of a cable known as Reykjavik-13.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MANNING_WIKILEAKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-05-21-12-11-02

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
1. Sloppy AP reporting--is the prosecution taking the naked plea, or is this a negotiated plea?
Tue May 21, 2013, 12:58 PM
May 2013

Either way, it clears the decks for the bigger charges.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
2. 1100 days of captivity and NOW the pros. gives up?
Tue May 21, 2013, 12:58 PM
May 2013

The only reason they are keeping that one count is so he can't sue, methinks.
And he pled guilty to that 'lesser charge" back in Feb.

Hope Manning will write an expose'.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
3. They are keeping 21 counts. The prosecution is not giving up--the most serious charges remain.
Tue May 21, 2013, 01:00 PM
May 2013

On edit---the plea was accepted on Specification 14 of the updated charge sheet...

Spec. 14: 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(1): The State Dept cable named "Reykjavik-13"

21 counts remain, although it's possible the prosecution agrees to shave off a few more.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
4. Ohhhhh....that AP story was not at all clear.
Tue May 21, 2013, 01:06 PM
May 2013

I just read it again and it sill can be taken 2 ways, IMO.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
5. Well, it's the AP!! I'm betting the prosecutors shave off another few charges
Tue May 21, 2013, 01:10 PM
May 2013

and trial goes ahead on the most serious ones---he offered a naked plea on 10 charges, and I wouldn't be surprised if the government accepts all or most of them. That leaves about a dozen that can give him up to life in prison.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
6. Seal Team Six member is testifying against Manning---
Tue May 21, 2013, 04:17 PM
May 2013
The most unusual stipulations apply to a member of the team that raided al-Qaida's compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011 and killed Osama bin Laden. The squad member will testify that he removed digital material from the compound that was later found to have contained WikiLeaks documents apparently requested personally by Bin Laden.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/10/bradley-manning-bin-laden-raid-testify


Stipulations that Manning has accepted--


In Tuesday's proceedings, Manning accepted through what is known as a "stipulation of fact" that the government had evidence that Bin Laden had taken a close personal interest in the material published by WikiLeaks. Manning has agreed not to contest the fact that when the Navy Seals left the compound they took with them several items of digital media that included a letter from Bin Laden to a member of al-Qaida, requesting that the member gather Department of Defense material posted to WikiLeaks.

The stipulation that Manning has accepted says that the digital items also contained a letter to Bin Laden from the same al-Qaida member to which the Afghanistan "war logs" – one of the most famous products of the WikiLeaks disclosures – were attached. Department of State information released by WikiLeaks was also among the Abbottabad discoveries.

The judge presiding over the court martial, Colonel Denise Lind, issued a ruling in which she outlined how classified information could be used during the trial. She said that within limits the prosecution could use classified documents to show that the material Manning transmitted to WikiLeaks could potentially be damaging to US interests.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/21/bradley-manning-wikileaks-suspect-aided-enemy
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WIKILEAKS PROSECUTOR ACCE...