General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPBS Killed WISCONSIN UPRISING Documentary "CITIZEN KOCH" To Appease Koch Brothers

"Citizen Koch," a documentary about money in politics focused on the Wisconsin uprising, was shunned by PBS for fear of offending billionaire industrialist David Koch, who has given $23 million to public television, according to Jane Mayer of the New Yorker. The dispute highlights the increasing role of private money in "public" television and raises even further concerns about the Kochs potentially purchasing eight major daily newspapers. The film from Academy Award-nominated filmmakers Carl Deal and Tia Lessin documents how the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision helped pave the way for secret political spending by players like the Kochs, who contributed directly and indirectly to the election of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in 2010 and came to his aid again when the battle broke out over his effort to limit collective bargaining.
Originally slated to appear on PBS stations nationwide as part of the "Independent Lens" series, "Citizen Koch" had its funding pulled after David Koch was offended by another PBS documentary critical of the billionaire industrialists. "People like the Kochs have worked for decades to undermine public funding for institutions like PBS," Deal told the Center for Media and Democracy. "When public dollars dry up, private dollars come in to make up for the shortfall." And that private funding can conflict with PBS' "public" mission and its editorial integrity. The PBS distributor "backed out of the partnership because they came to fear the reaction our film would provoke," Deal and Lessin said in a statement. "David Koch, whose political activities are featured in the film, happens to be a public-television funder and a trustee of both [New York PBS member station] WNET and [Boston member station] WGBH. This wasnt a failed negotiation or a divergence of visions; it was censorship, pure and simple.
"Park Avenue" Documentary Raised Koch Hackles
In November of last year, the New York PBS affiliate WNET aired a documentary by Oscar-winning filmmaker Alex Gibney, "Park Avenue," that explored growing income inequality by contrasting the lives of residents in a luxury apartment building in Manhattan with individuals living on the other end of Park Avenue, in the Bronx. The film focuses on one of the apartment's wealthiest residents, David Koch, and does not paint a particularly positive image of the billionaire industrialist and his brother, Charles. Koch is also a board trustee and major donor to WNET. And WNET's president called him before the documentary aired to alert Koch to the critical content -- and took the nearly unprecedented step of airing a disclaimer from Koch following the film calling it "disappointing and divisive." WNET also replaced the original introduction to the film, which had been narrated by actor Stanley Tucci, with one calling the film "controversial" and "provocative."
They tried to undercut the credibility of the film, and I had no opportunity to defend it, the film's director Gibney told Mayer. "Why is WNET offering Mr. Koch special favors?" Independent Television Service (ITVS), an arm of PBS that funds and distributes independent films, had funded "Park Avenue," and aired it as part of ITVS' popular "Independent Lens" series that runs on dozens of PBS member stations. ITVS also funded "Citizen Koch" and it was also slated to be aired on the Independent Lens series. But "Citizen Koch" got caught in the blowback.
cont'
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/16494-pbs-killed-wisconsin-uprising-documentary-citizen-koch-to-appease-koch-brothers
LeftInTX
(34,286 posts)Maybe it will show up on Netflix and YouTube
Indyfan53
(529 posts)It makes me glad I boycott the products of these robber barons.
Chef Eric
(1,024 posts)The one on Netflix is called 'Koch Brothers Exposed.' It was directed by Robert Greenwald.
'Citizen Koch' was directed by Carl Deal and Tia Lessin.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Charles and David Koch given credit for funding on a lot of PBS specials. Might that have something to do with it?
lunasun
(21,646 posts)IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,307 posts)... and former Senator Larry Pressler, R-SD, once wanted all public funding for PBS pulled, he basically said, "let the corporations become donors and put in a few commercials". You may recall, he once told his chamber members, "goodbye", opened the door to a Senate chamber closet and walked right in.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)pscot
(21,044 posts)lastlib
(28,260 posts)I know, it's tough to do when they've bought off all the politicians.
Embarrass them. Force them to disclose transactions, donations, business deals, financial holdings. Cockroaches (or, in this case, Koch-roaches) hate the light of day. Make them spend their miserable existence scurrying for the dark corners, then shine light on 'em there........Stalk them to the ends of the earth.
pscot
(21,044 posts)The mice all knew if they could just bell the cat thier quality of life would improve a lot. Are we men, or mice.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)And they worry about the government's "chilling affect" on the media. i venture to say that the media worries less about the Obama WH than they do about the Koch Bros. house of cards. And whereas the media would protest loudly about the government tracking down potential security risk whistleblowers, they won't even peep about the affect of the Koch brothers' control of journalists.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)However they do donate lots of money to PBS for programming. I contend that the money they do give to PBS is entirely for self serving purposes, specifically to have a financial hold over them that chills any programming that doesn't align with their interests. With those donations, they don't have to say a word. Their money does the talking and the decision makers within PBS who value those dollars over their own integrity and the reputation of the network do the dirty work for them.
corkhead
(6,119 posts)While we were so busy defending public broadcasting from public threats to shut them down over the past 2 or 3 decades, the right wingers quietly slipped around the flank, infiltrated them, and rotted them out from the inside. I have gone from finding them truly indispensable to now almost wishing Grover Norquist would drown them in a bathtub and put them out of our misery.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Cha
(319,067 posts)open. this will get Viewed. Kochs are Dangerous. PBS should know that. Didn't Kochhead mittload threathen to Close Them Down?
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)I'd hate the thought of ANOTHER generation of Koch trying to take over what's left of the country when these 2 ever finally piss off.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)The brothers Koch do not give anyone anything. I suspect they bill the people they sneeze on, for the multiple packets of Koch DNA.
Their contributions to PBS served many purposes. They were tax deductible, on corporate and personal levels. They paid off as good publicity within PBS and to the general public. They put in the executives of PBS a sense of obligation, a favor done is a favor owed; even though the Kochs apparently lack a sense of honor (at least as it is commonly defined). And if they can make PBS dependant on their money, they can exert a huge amount of pressure on the programming.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)A well diversified exploitation portfolio.
Any *good* Evil Financial Institution can help you work one out.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)then the Koch Bros. wouldn't be able to have this hold on them. Just sayin'...
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)The Kochs fund NOVA, at least in part. I watch and enjoy NOVA, but wish it would be done without Koch money. Most of those shows are quite good. There was one on the proliferation of drones that was way too drone friendly, its perspective was largely that of the people working on and piloting the drones, like isn't it amazing technology has evolved to the point we can do such things?
Kochs out of PBS, please.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)want to be the first to welcome our Dynasty Lords as they claim what is rightfully theirs: us and everything we have, (had).
Choose your dynasty wisely Serfs... wisely! You may be with them a long, long time.

East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Initech
(108,777 posts)Either these wannabe dictators declare themselves Caesar and stop buying the dumbest politicians on the planet and get it over with, or we rise up as one and arrest them and try them for treason.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)mojowork_n
(2,354 posts)Alfred Hitchcock knew what to do with sponsors.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/05/27/130527fa_fact_mayer
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Talking about never getting a smile or a tip from David Koch.
Cheap bastards. Destroying public discourse ever since the days of the John Birch Society.
mojowork_n
(2,354 posts)...in "Trading Places."
However accurate that comparison might be, we can only hope that somewhere,
someday, some of their tools -- like Scott Walker, who could be "Clarence Beeks" --
will get a similar comeuppance behind bars in a cage.
Unfortunately, I couldn't find a good Scott Walker graphic, only this one with
Herman Cain. (And sorry, I don't have time to photoshop up a new version.)

Up2Late
(17,797 posts)...I cringe every time I see and hear the program was "made possible" by David Koch.
marmar
(79,739 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Astazia
(262 posts)We need to fund independent filmmakers. The Koch's are trying buy Tribune Publications which have the Chicago Tribune, & the LA Times among them. This is going the way of state legislatures. They figure, hey while no ones looking, let's f*ck the 99% Statewide.
Michael Moore did interview with filmmakers who were supposed to air "Park Ave" from the richest to the Bronx showing the vast difference on the same exact street. Posh to impoverished. Koch stopped it after being a "board" member...of course like it was said earlier...investment to silence the rest of us who are in the way. This just keeps getting worse!
dsharp88
(526 posts)randr
(12,648 posts)if they will no longer be asking the public for support now that they have the Koch family supporting them.
Waiting for reply.
Botany
(77,323 posts)Koch Brothers money and money from McDonalds come w/ stribgs attached
Botany
(77,323 posts)... responsibility for the IRS "scandal." The liberal media of NPR and PBS
is now owned by the right.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)If the K bros can buy off PBS??? who do we have left??? I do check Democracy Now every day.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I believe it started with the administration of Shrub, but it might have been sooner.
As Marmar posted, I believe that Bill Moyers has retained his integrity. Other than that, I don't know.
I do enjoy Washington Week, for example, but I keep in mind that the RW National Journal calls some of the shots there.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Week
Whisp
(24,096 posts)In a week-long series, Heather Goldstone, reporter for the blog Climatide, and Sean Corcoran of WCAI on Cape Cod, Mass., look at the debate in one Massachusetts community where a 400-foot tall turbine has been turning for less than a year. While little scientific research has been completed to substantiate the claims)(it doesn't stop the store bought PBS from releasing this crap)), many residents living near the turbine are complaining of sleep deprivation, headaches, and tinnitus, or ringing of the ears. And they explore tricky questions such as: Is annoyance a health impact?
I gave up on PBS a long time ago when I kept seeing the Koch Bros as sponsors for many of their shows/propaganda.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Initech
(108,777 posts)Oh wait - in this country you don't have to with Citizens United in place.
savannah43
(575 posts)donate to it any longer.
Blue Owl
(59,095 posts)n/t
gopiscrap
(24,733 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)Initech
(108,777 posts)Cha
(319,067 posts)prevent their money from buying up paper for propaganda but isn't paper a dying breed? Dinosaurs in a Digital world?
Koch overkill.. wannabe murdoch so bad. What if we didn't have our networking.. If this were really 1984?! 
4dsc
(5,787 posts)So I have to wonder what the sheeple will do next? Boycott? Petition the power that be at PBS to have a change of heart perhaps?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)was now running PBS.
-p
DissidentVoice
(813 posts)I worked at a PBS TV station during the Newt Gingrich years, when he tried to kill off public television entirely.
The funding was so drastically cut that PBS stations have had to beg, borrow and fundraise (I spent many a night working auctions into the small hours) wherever they can.
It sucks that the Kochheads can exert so much influence over PBS, which is really the only sane, rational voice on U.S. TV today (John McLaughlin aside...OK, he could be worse, and he has Eleanor Clift as a panellist..."Bye BYE!"
. That, of course, makes it "Marxist-Leninist" to the Fux Noise crowd (when I worked there, my colleagues at the TV station were all over the spectrum politically, so that accusation is bullshit anyway).
However, looking at it the way our Station Manager had to look at it...again, PBS needs every cent it can get, even down to making deals with the Devil like the Koch Brothers.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts).