Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn May 1, Oklahoma did not love teachers quite so much
http://newsok.com/public-pension-reform-cant-be-ignored-forever-in-oklahoma/article/3804953Public pension reform can't be ignored forever in Oklahoma
The Oklahoman Editorial | Published: May 1, 2013
With one month left in the legislative session, groups opposed to making changes in state pension fund systems are ramping up efforts to see that they succeed.
The Oklahoma Education Association is among those urging members to tell lawmakers to leave pension plans alone. State Rep. Mike Brown, D-Tahlequah, for one, has bought in. Brown says he's gotten several emails from teachers terrified they are going to lose their retirement. In a news release, he acknowledged that Oklahoma's unfunded pension liability merits attention, but jeopardizing the retirement of our teachers and public employees is not the answer.
Of course it's not. Most of the groups covered by state pensions oppose the idea of making any changes to their current plans, which provide a defined benefit. Gov. Mary Fallin and state Treasurer Ken Miller are exploring a switch away from defined benefit plans, as about half the states have done. Why? Because Oklahoma's pension plans are unfunded by about $11 billion. That amount was greater a few years ago, before lawmakers changed the way cost-of-living adjustments are funded. Further pension reform is needed. It's unlikely to happen this session, due to the scope of the issue and the accompanying contention, but it can't be put off forever.
snip
This idea also has been met with opposition, but conservatives who champion smaller, more cost-efficient government should embrace it. And given their concerns about debt, they should be open to exploring further pension reform if not this session, then certainly in 2014.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1227 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On May 1, Oklahoma did not love teachers quite so much (Original Post)
SoCalDem
May 2013
OP
My Gov. Corbett (R--PA) is doing the same thing. But WE are a Blue State when push comes to shove.
WinkyDink
May 2013
#1
In a week or two, they will go right back to bashing those teachers benefits.
liberal N proud
May 2013
#2
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)1. My Gov. Corbett (R--PA) is doing the same thing. But WE are a Blue State when push comes to shove.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)2. In a week or two, they will go right back to bashing those teachers benefits.
Once the cameras are turned off.
gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)3. This country has become intellectually lazy
that is part of the anti education problem we have and it will cost us deeply
byeya
(2,842 posts)4. Most government workers are told a variation of "yes your pay is less than a private sector position
with the same educational requirements and responsibilities, but you will make up for it with vacation and sick days and your pension."