General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSan Onofre nuclear plant can restart before safety and criminal investigations are complete
The restart of the San Onofre nuclear plant could be authorized before the conclusion of investigations into the conduct of the plant operator, the chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission told a Senate committee on Thursday.
At a re-confirmation hearing in Washington, Allison Macfarlane said she expected her agencys evaluation of a restart proposal to conclude at about the same time as an investigation into whether plant operator Southern California Edison provided accurate and complete information to federal nuclear safety regulators.
But if the investigation lasts longer, nuclear commission staff would consult with their agencys Office of Investigations on any safety issues that may have emerged from the Edison probe. No specific time frames were discussed.
The technical staff will follow their procedures and will talk to the office of Investigations staff and ask, Are their any safety issues? Macfarlane said.
The comments were a response to Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), chairman of the environment and public works committee that provides oversight of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, who sought assurances that the investigations will be completed before any restart decision.
Lets just say if SoCal Edison wasnt honest with what they said to the commission and you allowed them to restart -- lets just say we have a problem, Boxer said.
A separate investigation into allegations of possible willful wrongdoing by nuclear commission personnel is being conducted by the agencys Office of the Inspector General.
The investigations are just one potential regulatory hurdle as Edison seeks permission to restart one of two reactors that have been sidelined since a radiation leak occurred on January 2012.
. . .
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/may/23/nuclear-restart-awaiting/
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Safety is the criterion on which a decision to restart should be based. If there are unresolved questions that could affect safety, the plant should not restart. If the unresolved questions don't affect safety, the plant should restart as soon as it's safe. San Onofre's power is needed.
Addison
(299 posts)I'm sure they can be trusted to keep things safe.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Addison
(299 posts)"Allison Macfarlane said she expected her agencys evaluation of a restart proposal to conclude at about the same time as an investigation into whether plant operator Southern California Edison provided accurate and complete information to federal nuclear safety regulators."
I don't know about you, but I'd be a little uncomfortable if the cops pulled someone over for a possible DUI and then let them drive home pending the lab tests. And a nuclear plant is a hell of a lot more dangerous than an automobile.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I said I would not restart under those circumstances.
Addison
(299 posts)Sen. Boxer gets it: you can't distinguish a criminal investigation from a safety investigation. If criminals and liars are running the place, that's a safety problem, regardless of whether the science has been proven to be safe. The plant should not restart until ALL investigations are complete and all issues rectified.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)It;s entirely possible that the safety matters could be identified and corrected before a criminal investigation concludes. The people at the NRC aren't stupid and they know a lot more than Boxer does about nuclear safety and how to run a power plant. I'll take the NRC over Boxer anyday.
Addison
(299 posts)over erring on the side of alleged criminals, any day. Especially when the stakes are so high.