Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
Fri May 24, 2013, 10:41 AM May 2013

GMO Labeling Bill Voted Down In Senate

GMO Labeling Bill Voted Down In Senate

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/23/gmo-labeling-bill-genetically-modified-food_n_3325972.html

WASHINGTON -- The United States Senate decided again Thursday that it simply does not want to let states tell people whether or not they are eating genetically modified food.

The Senate voted overwhelmingly -- 71 to 27 -- against an amendment to the sweeping farm bill, squashing a measure that would not have required labeling of genetically modified organisms, but merely would have let states decide if they wanted to require such labeling.

"The concept we're talking about today is a fairly commonsense and non-radical idea," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the sponsor of the amendment, said shortly before the vote. "All over the world, in the European Union, in many other countries around the world, dozens and dozens of countries, people are able to look at the food that they are buying and determine through labeling whether or not that product contains genetically modified organisms."

Sanders has noted that more than 3,000 ingredients are required to be labeled, but genetically modified ingredients are not part of that list. His state and Connecticut have passed laws to require such labeling, but Sanders said local leaders fear that large biotech corporations such as Monsanto could sue the states on the grounds that they are preempting federal authority. He said his bill would make clear that states can do what they want on the issue.

(more at link)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damn.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GMO Labeling Bill Voted Down In Senate (Original Post) abelenkpe May 2013 OP
The United States of Monsanto. n/t L0oniX May 2013 #1
Not just the US laundry_queen May 2013 #17
Roll call ProSense May 2013 #2
Thank you abelenkpe May 2013 #10
Jon Tester - Organic Farmer!!!!!!!!!!!! montanacowboy May 2013 #3
he's a yea vote! handmade34 May 2013 #6
Wow. Senatorial Sellout Berlum May 2013 #4
so we... handmade34 May 2013 #5
Almost every food item would require a label mick063 May 2013 #7
Sadly could not agree more. Nt abelenkpe May 2013 #9
Occultism up the wazoo Berlum May 2013 #8
Owned livestock woo me with science May 2013 #11
Unsurprisingly, bi-partisanship can always be achieved when the profits of huge corporation Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #12
The truth. nt laundry_queen May 2013 #18
If you wanted to know what was in your food, bvar22 May 2013 #13
I would hate to see this thread disappear so quickly. It's nice to know who the abject sellouts are byeya May 2013 #14
K&R! KoKo May 2013 #15
This really is a fight that we can win me b zola May 2013 #16
neither vt or ct have passed laws requiring labeling of GMO foods. what a shit piece of journalism cali May 2013 #19
Kick. I see from the list posted elsewhere in this thread that neither of my MN senators voted yes. scarletwoman May 2013 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #21
Along with GE salmon and processed foods, only these veg, fruits would require labeling. uppityperson Sep 2013 #22

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Roll call
Fri May 24, 2013, 10:48 AM
May 2013
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00135

YEAs ---27
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Hirono (D-HI)
King (I-ME)
Leahy (D-VT)
Manchin (D-WV)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)


Senate rejects GM food labeling amendment to farm bill

Bernie Sanders of Vermont says he will continue to push for declaration on packaging of genetically modified ingredients

The Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly rejected an amendment that would allow states to require labeling of genetically modified foods.

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said his amendment was an attempt to clarify that states can require the labels, as several legislatures have moved toward putting such laws into place. The Vermont house and the Connecticut senate voted this month to make food companies declare genetically modified ingredients on their packages.

The Senate rejected the amendment on a 71-27 vote, during debate on a wide-ranging, five-year farm bill that includes generous supports for crops like corn and soybeans that are often genetically modified varieties. Senators from farm states that use a lot of genetically modified crops strongly opposed the amendment, saying the issue should be left up to the federal government and that labels could raise costs for consumers.

<...>

The Senate may consider more amendments to the farm bill this week, including others dealing with genetically modified foods. The legislation sets policy for farm subsidies, other rural programs and domestic food aid.

- more -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/23/senate-gm-food-labeling-farm-bill

Senator Boxer also has an amendment: http://www.boxer.senate.gov/en/press/releases/042413.cfm

Let see if that passes.

montanacowboy

(6,081 posts)
3. Jon Tester - Organic Farmer!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fri May 24, 2013, 10:59 AM
May 2013

yep he is an "organic" farmer or at least that is what we are supposed to believe.

I am finished - he is owned lock stock and barrel - he is disgusting and he can go to hell.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
7. Almost every food item would require a label
Fri May 24, 2013, 11:23 AM
May 2013

Perhaps they don't want to reveal the magnitude. More likely, they just guaranteed a campaign contribution.

We live in ALEC world. We eat ALEC food. We live ALEC law. Our future is ALEC vision.

We are no longer a Democracy. We are 100% a corporatist state, in the guise of Democracy, that provides just enough guns, nationalism, and religion to keep the populace pacified.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
11. Owned livestock
Fri May 24, 2013, 01:49 PM
May 2013

eat cheap "People Chow."

We are owned by the One Percent, and they will feed us the cheapest and most profitable way they can devise.

This is what happens when corporations own governments and the ethos of "We the People" is replaced by a corporate bottom line.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
12. Unsurprisingly, bi-partisanship can always be achieved when the profits of huge corporation
Fri May 24, 2013, 02:04 PM
May 2013

are at risk.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
13. If you wanted to know what was in your food,
Fri May 24, 2013, 02:42 PM
May 2013

you should have voted for this guy:

&feature=player_embedded

What ever happened to THAT guy?
He would have made a great President.


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their promises.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]


 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
14. I would hate to see this thread disappear so quickly. It's nice to know who the abject sellouts are
Fri May 24, 2013, 04:31 PM
May 2013

and who was willing to vote on the basis of common sense and safe food. Also, who was willing to have informed consumers.

Only 27.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
16. This really is a fight that we can win
Fri May 24, 2013, 05:18 PM
May 2013

My facebook community is a mixture of mostly progressive but some conservatives, because we all share one cause, equal rights for adoptees. Everyone is civil about other matters, but I have been very uplifted to know that some conservatives are very much in the fight against gmo's and Monsanto in particular.

I so wish that people would be more into banding together for causes that they believe in rather than party politics. The GLBT community has been a shining light in this tactic. Lets band together on a specific issue rather than allow the PTB to divide us giving them free reign.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
19. neither vt or ct have passed laws requiring labeling of GMO foods. what a shit piece of journalism
Fri May 24, 2013, 06:22 PM
May 2013

can't even get the basics down correctly.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
20. Kick. I see from the list posted elsewhere in this thread that neither of my MN senators voted yes.
Fri May 24, 2013, 07:42 PM
May 2013

I guess Minnesota is Monsanto-owned as well.

Response to abelenkpe (Original post)

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
22. Along with GE salmon and processed foods, only these veg, fruits would require labeling.
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 08:03 PM
Sep 2013
http://www.pccnaturalmarkets.com/issues/gm/about_522.html
Sweet corn
Zucchini
Yellow crookneck squash
Papaya (from Hawaii)



Let's see more info from another source than a "vote no" site, if you have it.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GMO Labeling Bill Voted D...