Sun May 26, 2013, 06:52 AM
Ichingcarpenter (36,988 posts)
State forces fracking on some owners
A little-used state law that can force unwilling landowners to allow fracking on their property is growing more popular among drilling companies.
Since August, drilling companies have filed 11 so-called “unitization” requests with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Each request sought access to Utica shale oil and gas buried beneath the unwilling property owners’ land. The new requests, three of which have been approved, involve 38 landowners, businesses and public agencies that did not sign mineral-rights leases with drilling companies. The law allows companies to add unwilling properties to large drilling units to maximize access to oil and gas as long as at least 65 percent of the acres in a unit have been leased.In July 2012, the state had approved one such request. The properties in these newest requests cover more than 674 acres in Carroll, Columbiana, Harrison, Jefferson and Trumbull counties. Critics of shale drilling and fracking say unitization violates basic property rights. “This is yet another example of the deep, dark, black underside of this industry that they don’t want to talk about,” said Jack Shaner, a lobbyist with the Ohio Environmental Council. State oil and gas officials say the law guarantees fair compensation, and that the properties of unwilling landowners won’t be damaged by drilling rigs, pipelines, trucks or other equipment.Natural Resources officials said drilling companies cannot drill, lay pipelines or otherwise damage the surface of an unwilling landowner’s property. Unitization does allow the company to drill horizontally through the shale beneath that landowner’s property. More:http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/05/25/state-forces-fracking-on-some-owners.html ![]()
|
4 replies, 864 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Ichingcarpenter | May 2013 | OP |
annabanana | May 2013 | #1 | |
Ichingcarpenter | May 2013 | #2 | |
FreeJoe | May 2013 | #3 | |
byeya | May 2013 | #4 |
Response to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)
Sun May 26, 2013, 07:11 AM
annabanana (52,791 posts)
1. How the HELL can they guarantee that "properties of unwilling landowners won’t be damaged
by drilling rigs, pipelines, trucks or other equipment" . .??
And exactly what is the compensation when these things inevitably come to pass? Disgusting big-footing by our corporate masters..... |
Response to annabanana (Reply #1)
Sun May 26, 2013, 09:42 AM
Ichingcarpenter (36,988 posts)
2. Corporations are people too my friend
and your land and water rights mean nothing to our inalienable right to have it all.
|
Response to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)
Sun May 26, 2013, 09:48 AM
FreeJoe (1,036 posts)
3. I'm confused
Let's take an example where you and I have adjoining property and you lease your mineral rights and I don't. If you drill for oil on your property, there is no way for you to avoid taking oil from my property. It would be like us co-owning a lake and you taking out "your water" and leaving mine.
Are they saying that someone not leasing their mineral rights is being forced to allow drilling activity on their property? |
Response to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)
Sun May 26, 2013, 09:57 AM
byeya (2,842 posts)
4. "They hate us for our freedoms"...You got your freedoms until the Corpacracy wants them and then
you lose your freedoms. Never really had them at all did you?
"A man's home is his castle" is another oldie but goodie |