Americans and Their Military, Drifting Apart

[Scuba]

Americans and Their Military, Drifting Apart

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/opinion/americans-and-their-military-drifting-apart.html?_r=0

STANFORD, Calif. — AFTER fighting two wars in nearly 12 years, the United States military is at a turning point. So are the American people. The armed forces must rethink their mission. Though the nation has entered an era of fiscal constraint, and though President Obama last week effectively declared an end to the “global war on terror” that began on Sept. 11, 2001, the military remains determined to increase the gap between its war-fighting capabilities and those of any potential enemies. But the greatest challenge to our military is not from a foreign enemy — it’s the widening gap between the American people and their armed forces.

Three developments in recent decades have widened this chasm. First and most basic was the decision in 1973, at the end of combat operations in Vietnam, to depart from the tradition of the citizen-soldier by ending conscription and establishing a large, professional, all-volunteer force to maintain the global commitments we have assumed since World War II. In 1776, Samuel Adams warned of the dangers inherent in such an arrangement: “A standing Army, however necessary it may be at some times, is always dangerous to the Liberties of the People. Soldiers are apt to consider themselves as a Body distinct from the rest of the Citizens.”

For nearly two generations, no American has been obligated to join up, and few do. Less than 0.5 percent of the population serves in the armed forces, compared with more than 12 percent during World War II. Even fewer of the privileged and powerful shoulder arms. In 1975, 70 percent of members of Congress had some military service; today, just 20 percent do, and only a handful of their children are in uniform.

...

Together, these developments present a disturbingly novel spectacle: a maximally powerful force operating with a minimum of citizen engagement and comprehension. Technology and popular culture have intersected to perverse effect. While Vietnam brought home the wrenching realities of war via television, today’s wars make extensive use of computers and robots, giving some civilians the decidedly false impression that the grind and horror of combat are things of the past. The media offer us images of drone pilots, thousands of miles from the fray, coolly and safely dispatching enemies in their electronic cross hairs. Hollywood depicts superhuman teams of Special Operations forces snuffing out their adversaries with clinical precision.

I served during the VietNam era, and the ranks were filled with folks from all walks of American life. I believe bringing back the draft would have a chilling effect on Americans who would again see their sons and daughters used as fodder. And that would be a good thing.

[Geoff R. Casavant]

1. I agree with you about the draft, but would take it a step further.

I say we emulate Israel on this one. Out of high school, and off you go for 2 or 3 years of compulsory service. When you're done you get tuition assistance for college if you need it. No deferments, no exceptions but for serious medical conditions (i.e., no "flat feet" or ass pimple exemptions). Those that are excused for medical conditions get an appropriate public service job instead.

Fail to do this, and say goodbye to student loans, government employment, elected office, driver's licenses, and anything else I can think of.

[leftyohiolib]

2. yes bring back the draft - if a war is so g-damned important then all as in ALL americans should be

sacrificing not just a handful of families

[xchrom]

3. Du rec. Nt

[WinkyDink]

4. "After fighting two wars in nearly 12 years" = WRONG terminology. "After illegally invading......."

[msongs]

5. the military has become just another job with awesome retirement and benefits nt