Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe complicit media: still trying to push Republican scamdals.
Putting 'IRS higher-ups' and 'conservative groups' in a headline doesn't make it news
by Jed Lewison
NBC appears to believe that this is some kind of scoop, but it actually isn't news:
Here's two reasons this isn't news. First, The Washington Post already reported this information two weeks ago, albeit with a report that didn't read like a press release from Jay Sekulow.
Second, and more importantly, it's not a "scandal" if the IRS asks groups applying for special tax status to verify their eligibility. If you want special privileges, you're going to have to be willing to substantiate your claims. When the IRS asks a group applying for 501(c)(4) status to prove that it is entitled to that status, that's the IRS doing its job.
The problem comes if some groups are treated differently than other groups because of their political belief. But that doesn't mean the IRS should rubber-stamp the applications of political groupsit just means that left or right, all political groups should be on a level playing field.
There's no question that the laws here are a mess, and the regulations surrounding them aren't any better. But those laws and regulations require the IRS to ask these kinds of questions. As long as they are on the books, political groups that seek non-profit status are going to have to be prepared to provide answers. It's not surprising that lawyers like Jay Sekulow would try to blur the line between the IRS doing its job and its unacceptable targeting practices, but NBC really should know better than to be his stenographer.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/29/1212198/-Putting-IRS-higher-ups-and-conservative-groups-in-a-headline-doesn-t-make-it-news
by Jed Lewison
NBC appears to believe that this is some kind of scoop, but it actually isn't news:
Additional scrutiny of conservative organizations activities by the IRS did not solely originate in the agencys Cincinnati office, with requests for information coming from other offices and often bearing the signatures of higher-ups at the agency, according to attorneys representing some of the targeted groups. At least one letter requesting information about one of the groups bears the signature of Lois Lerner, the suspended director of the IRS Exempt Organizations department in Washington.
Jay Sekulow, an attorney representing 27 conservative political advocacy organizations that applied to the Internal Revenue Service for tax-exempt status, provided some of the letters to NBC News. He said the groups contacts with the IRS prove that the practices went beyond a few front line employees in the Cincinnati office, as the IRS has maintained.
Here's two reasons this isn't news. First, The Washington Post already reported this information two weeks ago, albeit with a report that didn't read like a press release from Jay Sekulow.
Second, and more importantly, it's not a "scandal" if the IRS asks groups applying for special tax status to verify their eligibility. If you want special privileges, you're going to have to be willing to substantiate your claims. When the IRS asks a group applying for 501(c)(4) status to prove that it is entitled to that status, that's the IRS doing its job.
The problem comes if some groups are treated differently than other groups because of their political belief. But that doesn't mean the IRS should rubber-stamp the applications of political groupsit just means that left or right, all political groups should be on a level playing field.
There's no question that the laws here are a mess, and the regulations surrounding them aren't any better. But those laws and regulations require the IRS to ask these kinds of questions. As long as they are on the books, political groups that seek non-profit status are going to have to be prepared to provide answers. It's not surprising that lawyers like Jay Sekulow would try to blur the line between the IRS doing its job and its unacceptable targeting practices, but NBC really should know better than to be his stenographer.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/29/1212198/-Putting-IRS-higher-ups-and-conservative-groups-in-a-headline-doesn-t-make-it-news
There is a reason Republicans don't want a real investigation of Benghazi or the IRS incidents: They want to keep using their scamdals to score political points.
No IRS Special Prosecutor
Indictments are less important than political accountability.
Like dumber follows dumb, the scandal of politicized IRS tax enforcement has been followed by calls for a "special prosecutor." Republicans are predictably leading this call against a Democratic Administration, but this is one case in which the GOP should hope it doesn't get its way.
The case for a special counsel is that Attorney General Eric Holder can't be trusted to investigate his Administration, and that the Administration will stonewall Congress. We don't trust Mr. Holder either, but letting him pass the buck to a special prosecutor is doing him a favor. This scandal is best handled in Congressional hearings that educate the public in the next year rather than wait two or three years for potential indictments.
- more -
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323855804578511441999295924.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Indictments are less important than political accountability.
Like dumber follows dumb, the scandal of politicized IRS tax enforcement has been followed by calls for a "special prosecutor." Republicans are predictably leading this call against a Democratic Administration, but this is one case in which the GOP should hope it doesn't get its way.
The case for a special counsel is that Attorney General Eric Holder can't be trusted to investigate his Administration, and that the Administration will stonewall Congress. We don't trust Mr. Holder either, but letting him pass the buck to a special prosecutor is doing him a favor. This scandal is best handled in Congressional hearings that educate the public in the next year rather than wait two or three years for potential indictments.
- more -
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323855804578511441999295924.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Boehner Still Opposes Special Committee To Investigate Benghazi
By Ben Armbruster
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said on Wednesday that he does not think there needs to be a special select committee to investigate the Obama administrations handing of the terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya last year.
Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) is leading the House Republican effort for a select committee and Boehner has said in the past that the lower chambers established committees can handle Benghazi oversight. On Fox News Wednesday night, the Ohio Republican, despite pressure from his own caucus, said he continues to stand by that position:
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/24/2059331/boehner-committee-benghazi/
By Ben Armbruster
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said on Wednesday that he does not think there needs to be a special select committee to investigate the Obama administrations handing of the terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya last year.
Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) is leading the House Republican effort for a select committee and Boehner has said in the past that the lower chambers established committees can handle Benghazi oversight. On Fox News Wednesday night, the Ohio Republican, despite pressure from his own caucus, said he continues to stand by that position:
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/05/24/2059331/boehner-committee-benghazi/
Issa Serves Kerry With Subpoena For Benghazi Docs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014494378
The media/GOP went quiet for several days after it was revealed that the GOP manufactured evidence, now Issa is back to trying to hype Benghazi and the media goes back to pushing Republicans talking points on the IRS
The Lie Matters: What Did Sen Coburn Know about the Edited Benghazi Email and How Did He Know It
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022868542
WaPo fact checker gives WH claim that Repubs doctored email to smear the President three Pinocchios
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022877163
GOP Aides Mock House Republicans Crazy Benghazi Witch-Hunt
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022878290
Looks like they found the source of the IRS cover-up: Darrell Issa
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022878900
What Boehner considers 'inconceivable'
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022889651
Internal Emails Indicate IRS Targeting Designed By Low-Level Staffers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022889923
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 769 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The complicit media: still trying to push Republican scamdals. (Original Post)
ProSense
May 2013
OP
clarice
(5,504 posts)1. I find all of this very worrisome. nt