Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Thu May 30, 2013, 02:51 PM May 2013

Fox’s Erick Erickson: It’s ‘Anti-Science’ To Not Believe Men Should ‘Dominate’ Women


by Andrew Kirell | 10:47 am, May 30th, 2013

Appearing on a Fox Business panel Wednesday evening, Fox contributor Erick Erickson suggested it is “anti-science” to reject the biological claim that men should be in the “dominant” role in the nuclear family.

This particular panel segment of Lou Dobbs Tonight took on a recent Pew study claiming that mothers are now the primary source of income in 40 percent of American households. Dobbs characterized the findings as “troubling” while panelist Juan Williams asserted that it indicates “something going terribly wrong in American society.”

Erickson added to that by suggesting female breadwinners are antithetical to biology:

“I’m so used to liberals telling conservatives that they’re anti-science. But liberals who defend this and say it is not a bad thing are very anti-science. When you look at biology — when you look at the natural world — the roles of a male and a female in society and in other animals, the male typically is the dominant role. The female, it’s not antithesis, or it’s not competing, it’s a complementary role.”


http://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-erick-erickson-its-anti-science-to-not-believe-men-should-dominate-women/
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox’s Erick Erickson: It’s ‘Anti-Science’ To Not Believe Men Should ‘Dominate’ Women (Original Post) Cali_Democrat May 2013 OP
He's just running from reality Kurovski May 2013 #1
Oh Erick Does Not Run! He Is Carried By His Harem HangOnKids May 2013 #7
I know it's awful to say... Kurovski May 2013 #11
Amanda Marcotte is Slate cali May 2013 #2
Dobbs and Juan Williams couldn't pass up an opportunity to make MattBaggins May 2013 #3
it was an all male panel on an issue about women being the cali May 2013 #5
Not one of them realizes how stupid they sounded either MattBaggins May 2013 #6
That pig Erickson wouldn't know science Zoeisright May 2013 #4
And yet the King of Beasts is rules by the females Occulus May 2013 #8
Well said! silverweb May 2013 #10
and let's not mention ants, bees or spiders... 0rganism May 2013 #12
This guy is full of shit. Dash87 May 2013 #9
someone must have beat this mofo with a dominating ugly stick. n/t Whisp May 2013 #13
He needs to be introduced to this lady...... LongTomH May 2013 #14

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
1. He's just running from reality
Thu May 30, 2013, 02:55 PM
May 2013

intelligent people naturally dominate fatheaded dumb-fucks with redundant names.

Isn't there a fund I can contribute to for his affliction?

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
7. Oh Erick Does Not Run! He Is Carried By His Harem
Thu May 30, 2013, 03:46 PM
May 2013

Just another LAME-O loser making excuses why he can't get laid.

MattBaggins

(7,904 posts)
3. Dobbs and Juan Williams couldn't pass up an opportunity to make
Thu May 30, 2013, 02:58 PM
May 2013

asses of themselves either I see.

OMG women becoming successful is the end of the world.

Stupid dumb @#$%S

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. it was an all male panel on an issue about women being the
Thu May 30, 2013, 03:08 PM
May 2013

primary wage earners in 40% of the country. And all of them said it was a harbinger of the end of the world.

really.

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
4. That pig Erickson wouldn't know science
Thu May 30, 2013, 02:59 PM
May 2013

if it bit him in his pasty white butt. He's the very definition of scientifically illiterate.

0rganism

(23,953 posts)
12. and let's not mention ants, bees or spiders...
Thu May 30, 2013, 11:34 PM
May 2013

oh wait, guess i just did. But those are just the super-obvious ones.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
9. This guy is full of shit.
Thu May 30, 2013, 04:26 PM
May 2013

First off, the male is not always the dominant of a given species - it's actually not very common. This is also not entirely true of humans throughout history either.

This dork is just making shit up like usual on Fox News.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fox’s Erick Erickson: It’...