Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 04:31 AM Jun 2013

Vows To Rebuild Million Dollar Homes in Burnt Forest

Untold thousands of homes in Colorado's heavily populated Front Range are at risk for fires, said Gregory Simon, an assistant professor of geography who studies urban wildfires at the University of Colorado-Denver. Many are built on windy mountain roads or cul-de-sacs — appealing to home buyers seeking privacy but often hampering efforts to stamp out fire. Residents in the outdoor-loving state are also attracted by the ability to hike from their backyards and have horses.

"Unfortunately, these environments give the appearance of being peaceful, tranquil and bucolic and natural. But they believe the reality that they are combustible, volatile and at times dangerous," Simon said.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/trio-blazes-burn-control-colorado-19386203#.Ub1ysZwmbIA

Isn't it time stop building mega mansions in known danger zones?



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Pelican

(1,156 posts)
1. As long as they can get their own insurance...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 06:21 AM
Jun 2013

I'm not sure there is anywhere in America that is completely out of the danger zone for some sort of disaster.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
2. They probably don't. Insurance companies don't like that kind of environment and when they do sell
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:15 AM
Jun 2013

policies in the exurbs, usually have requirements like 30' fire breaks around the property. So if the owners didn't keep it cleared, they won't pay.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. I think they could build homes to codes that reduced the fire risk.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:31 AM
Jun 2013

And have local ordinances regarding residential set backs/ zones cleared of trees, brush, and duff.

But of course, then you'd have that nasty nanny government involved in your life, watching over you, catching you in your fire risk mistakes.

Archae

(46,301 posts)
5. Many of these people will demand government help...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:47 AM
Jun 2013

But yell and scream at Teabagger meetings about "too much government."

(Beautiful example: John Stossel. A storm destroyed his beachfront vacation home, and Mr "Government Is Too Big" got government help to rebuild.)

 

bike man

(620 posts)
6. If they can afford to build them and accept the potential hazards, why not? People build
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:51 AM
Jun 2013

houses where there are mud slides, tornadoes, hurricanes, alongside levees in flood zones.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vows To Rebuild Million D...