Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:36 PM Jun 2013

The Private-Intelligence Boom, By The Numbers - MoJo

The Private-Intelligence Boom, by the Numbers
By Tim Murphy| MoJo
Thu Jun. 13, 2013 3:40 AM PDT

<snip>

Edward Snowden revealed to the world the startling breadth of the National Security Agency's surveillance efforts, but his story also highlighted another facet of today's intelligence world: the increasingly privatized national security sector, in which a high school dropout could bring in six figures while gaining access to state secrets. Over the last decade, firms like Booz Allen Hamilton, where Snowden worked for three months, have gobbled up nearly 60 cents out of every dollar the government spends on intelligence. A majority of top-secret security clearances now go to private contractors who provide services to the government at stepped up rates.

"I like to call Booz Allen the shadow <intelligence community>," Joan Dempsey, a vice president at the firm, said in 2004, as captured in Tim Shorrock's book, Spies for Hire. No kidding. Here's a look at our mushrooming intelligence contracting sector:







<snip>

More: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/national-security-inc-our-private-intelligence-apparatus-numbers


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Private-Intelligence Boom, By The Numbers - MoJo (Original Post) WillyT Jun 2013 OP
Yep. Profit, not protection. And we're all paying. DirkGently Jun 2013 #1
Privatization is really a code word for looting Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #2
+1000 forestpath Jun 2013 #12
Of Course we need contractors, how else can we pay those salaries. bahrbearian Jun 2013 #3
k and r nashville_brook Jun 2013 #4
K&R G_j Jun 2013 #5
Kick !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #6
kick nt Hissyspit Jun 2013 #7
hire me hire me flamingdem Jun 2013 #8
k/r marmar Jun 2013 #9
Thanks, WillyT MrScorpio Jun 2013 #10
Kick. scarletwoman Jun 2013 #11

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
1. Yep. Profit, not protection. And we're all paying.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:38 PM
Jun 2013

And of course, private enterprise would neeeeeever abuse access to vast swaths of private information.

You can trust them. They're from Capitalism, and they're here to help you.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
2. Privatization is really a code word for looting
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:45 PM
Jun 2013

From public utilities to prisons and now to surveillance.

MrScorpio

(73,778 posts)
10. Thanks, WillyT
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 04:57 PM
Jun 2013

You've given us more exposure about this issue than Greenwald and Snowden ever has.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Private-Intelligence ...