I have a big problem with some of you and ProSense.

[babylonsister]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by uppityperson (a host of the General Discussion forum).

This person posts stuff, as do I. Love it or leave it, but get over it! We are allowed on DU to share info; I thought that was what this place was about?

Don't like it? Move on. Don't disparage good people. Karma...

And thank you, Pro, for being such a smart advocate!

[Luminous Animal]

1. LET PROSENSE POST HER STUFF!!!!

Oh that's right. No one is challenging her right to post stuff.

[Electric Monk]

17. funny memories

[Kolesar]

20. Whatever that means

You have the skill to link a photo. How impressive

[reformist2]

27. I have a problem with the QUANTITY of posts. It's too much.

[sheshe2]

53. Your reason being? nt

[reformist2]

62. My reason being that a few posters can totally dominate the front page with their ideas.

Part of free speech is letting everyone have a chance to have their say. And that doesn't happen if some people are talking non-stop, all-day-long, 24/7.

[sheshe2]

101. "My reason being that a few posters can totally dominate the front page with their ideas."

reformist2, I could not agree with you more!

You really do not need me to link the posts 24/7 on Snowden hero of the people....Obama worse than Bush...and Greenwald Greenwald our savior.

Do I?! Dozens day and night over and over. Are those Okay with you?

[HangOnKids]

128. Wow What A Hyperbolic Hissy Fit

Greenwald has been proclaimed "our savior?" Really?

[MADem]

60. HIDE THREAD will turn your "too much" into "just enough" or even "None at all." You have the power.

Maybe you should use it?

[reformist2]

63. No, I choose to recommend a thread limit of 5 new threads per day per person.

[MADem]

68. Well, if you insist, I urge you to scoot on over to ATA and ask for that, if you

really mean it and aren't just spitting into the wind.

Let me make a prediction--your recommendation will not be adopted. Imagine what such an awful rule would have done to gone-but-not-forgotten gems like Kephra?

But off you go, make your case, and here's a link to make your path smoother: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1259

[dlwickham]

89. when you get your own website you can make all the rules you want

you're a guest on DU just like the rest of us

if you don't like the way the admins run the site, you can always find another one more to your liking

[alittlelark]

123. ??? WTF ....

Are u for real?

[pscot]

37. Cheap shot

[MADem]

56. No, they are merely making personal disparagements towards her in response to her posts.

Which isn't a very civil way to behave.

If this were elementary school, that sort of thing would be called "bullying."

[Luminous Animal]

67. I try not to. I prefer to argue with her head on but I refuse to argue with her blue links.

They are a waste of my time. I am not going to chase one blue link after another to suss out what she is trying to say. She either puts up without the self-referential posts or I am out of engaging with her.

[MADem]

73. If you don't like her methods, there are ways to avoid them. Trying to control how she creates her

arguments is a bit hyper-controlling, IMO.

You can either jump in and participate, or eschew.

I don't think it's appropriate for people to toss insults, as I said, but I also don't think it's appropriate to tell people how they are allowed to make their case. It's just not valid to say "I don't like your use of citations to make a point" when way too many people here don't offer any links at all.

I happen to like links, I click, I learn.

To each his own--or her own, for that matter. There's always HIDE THREAD if you aren't feeling it, and IGNORE if you just can't deal at all.

[Luminous Animal]

79. I have zero power to control what she does but I tell her flat out that I won't

click on her blue links and to present her argument in the "here and now." If she is unwilling to do that, then I leave it alone.

And yes. I am aware of the HIDE THREAD and the IGNORE feature. If you are lucky, there a some DUers reading your post who were ignorant of such and are rushing to employ those features, of which they were previously clueless, tout suite.

[MADem]

91. One can only hope. nt

[Mojorabbit]

127. I have three people on ignore

I only use it when I just can't take it anymore and then capitulate. . She is one. It makes the experience here so much more pleasurable. Life is too short to waste time following blue links that lead nowhere in the end.

[Moosepoop]

137. So, what color are the links in your world?

The major problem you and some others I have seen is that ProSense's links are blue.

Would her links be OK if they were, say, red? How about green? Orange? Plaid??

I've seen you post links, as well -- and perhaps I shouldn't tell you this, for fear of causing you some sort of mental anguish -- but... your links are blue, too...

I hope your head didn't just explode...

[Luminous Animal]

139. It is a DU2 reference where links to ones own threads appeared blue.

Thanks for playing.

[Moosepoop]

147. I was here for DU2. We've been on DU3 for quite some time now.

Try to keep up.

[sheshe2]

143. It is elementary school

They have nothing!

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10022757642#post104

For a laugh check out post # 60/71 and 74~

[PufPuf23]

65. Considered suggesting a self-imposed year of silence for reflection to Prosense at 100,000 posts...

admittedly part in sarcasm.

DU does not suppress a wide and reasonable range of opinion.

Some of us oldsters are canaries in the coal mine.

[JackRiddler]

105. "Post stuff," sure. Flooding, however, is a well known bullying tactic.

Could I throw out 12 or 20 nearly identical talking points a day and pretend it's not a campaign to dominate GD in the face of my opinions not actually being the majority's? Sure! Why wouldn't I be allowed to get away with that? Why doesn't it interest me?

[Union Scribe]

2. Festivus already?

This airing of grievances seems a bit early.

[Union Scribe]

7. It's a joke. Lighten up angrypants. nt

[Kolesar]

15. I don't have to lighten anything, you phony eom

[Union Scribe]

38. Lol.

I assure you I'm not worth blowing a blood vessel over.

[babylonsister]

6. Pardon me? I voiced my opinion. You got a problem with that? nt

[Union Scribe]

40. No.

I take it you aren't a Seinfeld fan. It was just the wording you used was very similar to the character Frank Costanza, whose made-up holiday Festiuvs had an "airing of grievances" segment that he began "I got a lot of problems with you people!" It was offered in a light-hearted manner I promise.

[babylonsister]

58. So sorry!

I didn't understand.

[Union Scribe]

66. No, my bad.

I shouldn't drop a joke in right away when someone's trying to make a point. That's how misunderstandings usually happen with me. Have a good night.

[treestar]

9. Not whatever manner they see fit

The personal attacks are unwarranted. And it is true she can take care of herself.

[one_voice]

13. Welcome to DU...

again.

[Kolesar]

16. Clown's been on here all of three hours and comes out swinging

"again" ... well said

[sheshe2]

46. Interesting!

I have a secret admirer, that came out swinging after 5 days.

Wham bam and proceeded to tell me what I thought, then on a repost told me to leave this site.

Hmm someone said the same about them. Welcome again!

I smell something.

Well said Kolesar!

[zeemike]

111. Gee...that sounds lie a personal attack

And this thread seems to invite it....I wonder why that is.

Seems like some are angry because of the NSA thing and the others are angry at them for being angry at the NSA thing....so we have a crack and a wedge and now to drive it home.

[Cha]

23. Not quite as they see fit. Some are ugly ass personal attacks

and they've been hidden by more than one jury.

[SidDithers]

24. Braaaaaaaains!!!

Come back again soon.

Sid

[pnwmom]

96. "in whatever manner they see fit" that isn't abusive or hurtful. n/t

[rhett o rick]

109. The fact is she gets away with what others cant. Juries lover her. I ignore her. nm

[treestar]

5. Agreed there are too many personal attacks

And yet Prosense never gets mad and rarely if ever insults the posters who are always making fun of her and complaining about her "blue links" as if it is wrong to at least try to back up what you are saying. It's that they are so annoyed that the President they hate has any defense at all.

[babylonsister]

11. Heh. Bye sooner or later. nt

[treestar]

12. Is this all you have?

Personal attacks aren't convincing.

[sheshe2]

49. Facts are your friend! nt!

[Luminous Animal]

26. Backing up what you are saying is not linking to your own posts.

I'll refute Prosense original OPs all day long if I had the time. But I will not fall into the trap of arguing with her "blue link" spin from thread to thread. One DUer characterized it as playing with those increasingly smaller Russian dolls and I agree.

[one_voice]

31. She links to her own posts...

because often times that's where the outside sources (links) are. It's probably easier to link to her DU posts than to search for all the other links. It's not that difficult to figure out. It's not like she links to a self written OP--there are always links to outside sources.

[Luminous Animal]

39. Easier translates to me as lazy. Easier translates to unwilling to engage the topic at hand

with original content. Easier is a distraction. Make your case without leading your "opponent" to slog through an into an entirely old discussion.

[one_voice]

41. Why does it mean lazier? You click a link and everything...

you need is there. Sounds like your complaining just to complain. What difference does it make if you click one link and see everything or she posts 5 links for you to see. You don't have to slog through anything.

You click a link and her post are always laid out nicely.

Sounds like you want to catered to....suck it up. If you're too lazy to click a link then you really don't want to debate, you're looking for a way out.

[stevenleser]

61. They don't like it because they have nothing in response. It's easy to spout all kinds of crap if

you don't have to back it up with links to facts. When the other person does it and you can't, well, they know what that means and it infuriates them.

[sheshe2]

69. An old discussion?

Do you mean to say that when she posts a recant to~

Snowden snowden snowden....hero hero hero

and

Obama obama obama fail fail fail...worse than bush

that ProSense is linking to an entirely old discussion!

Seriously............

They are running up and down GD on a daily basis!

One after another, on and on and on!

IMHO, WOW!

[pscot]

55. I really wish people would lay off

that hate the Prez meme. I'm sure there are DUers who hate Obama, but the number is vanishingly small. It is possible to have a political disagreement without hating someone. You can't simply dismiss all criticsm as mere personal antipathy. It's dismissive and it angers people. And when this kind of stuff gets personalized, any hope of understanding one another goes out the window. In the words of a great American, can't we all just get along?

[BlueStreak]

106. Thank you for stating it clearly.

Many of us do get the feeling that a certain element on this board imposes a "purity test" that amounts to supporting unconditionally everything Obama does and says. And these same people seem to be the ones who recently have bombarded this place with hundreds of threads that were nothing but ad hominem attacks on Snowden.

While I don't believe ad hominem attacks on third parties violate the DU TOU, I find it offensive, and a shallow attempt to distract from the core issues Snowden raised. And why come with those red herrings? Apparently because there is no real defense for the positions this President is taking on this issue.

I can still love Obama for some other things, but I will not stand with him where he is right now.

[treestar]

141. The same people over and over again blaming Obama for the latest outrage

Starts to stink to high heaven after a while.

[okaawhatever]

10. Go ProSense, go babylonsister!! nt

[NYC_SKP]

14. You can tell a person who has no argument by the way they reply to her posts.

Making fun of blue links, calling her a shill.

The truth is that her posts are among the most well written and well-sourced posts one can find on DU.

So good are they that arguments fall flat, very few can respond in kind, so many respond with insults.

It's just another one of those things that makes DU suck.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8319664

[babylonsister]

18. I know. She is a star, and when

people argue about she/he v. what she posts, I am shocked. DU needs to come to grips and get off the outrage mobile.

[Scurrilous]

28. Her detractors have taken to alerting on her threads over nothing..

At Mon Jun 17, 2013, 04:54 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

NYT editor's blog: Snowden’s Questionable New Turn
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023034825

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

75th post about the same topic today. For the jury this is "otherwise inappropriate" because this paid shill has been spamming DU all day with this nonsense...

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 17, 2013, 05:07 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.


Pathetic.

[Tarheel_Dem]

33. She is definitely a target, but she's resilient, and they hate her for it. Go Pro!!!!!

[babylonsister]

34. Screw 'em. She's/he's been here longer than me, and

has educated me. I love this person, and the people who don't read what ProSense offers are the poorer for it.

Some of us try to educate. Is that so difficult to swallow?

[malaise]

45. 0-6 to leave it

Great

[Number23]

83. Wonder if the 75 posts from 2-3 other posters riding the pro-Snowden wagon got alerted on too?

There was a point over the last few days that I saw one person's name I think as the OP of five different threads on the front page of GD. And it wasn't Prosense.

[sheshe2]

72. +1000!

Well said SKP!

[Number23]

87. + a thousand

[siligut]

90. Yes, I agree and have to wonder about DUers who don't recognize what an asset she is

I tend to wonder where the contempt stems from. Is it because she is so articulate and informed that she somehow threatens them? Usually if a poster isn't to ones liking, one just ignores them. But I have seen posts lately that seek to discredit and curtail her posts.

[BlueJazz]

19. Damn..I must be really out of the loop. I thought you were talking about some new drug.

"ProSense..when walking through reality is becoming a drag"

[babylonsister]

22. Hahaha! nt

[Hydra]

21. It wouldn't be a problem, except...

[babylonsister]

25. Bwhaha, dammit! nt

[Agnosticsherbet]

29. This is so meta... n/y

[progressoid]

35. Yup

[graham4anything]

30. yeah, facts, calmly and stated are a terrible inconvient truth

it is so highly ironic too.

Wish I myself could write as concise.

[Tarheel_Dem]

32. Thanks to you babylonsis & ProSense!

[Cha]

36. I have that same problem with those who get on her

threads just to act like a grade school bully boy clique, babylonsistah.

mahalo for letting them know their posts say everything about them and nothing about ProSense. They have nothing to refute her message with so they attempt to slur. It makes them look

ProSense

Same for you after all these years, babylonsistah ~

[graham4anything]

81. +1000.

[sheshe2]

82. Correct!

The neener neener posts about your boyfriend! These were a while ago.

Really grade school or what!

Facts hurt them, Cha!

You know what, They can't handle the truth!

you are right the do look silly!

[malaise]

42. +1,000

Rec

[Buzz Clik]

43. I'm a fan, sister, of yours and ProSense.

You guys are consistent and passionate about your issues. Sometimes I agree, sometimes I disagree. Strongly. But, I am with you -- everyone gets to post and air their opinions.

[jazzimov]

44. I love that she actually posts LINKS!

Whether you agree with her or not, at least she posts links that backs her up!

If you disagree with Pro, then you should back it up, Too!

(thank you babylonsis for posting this!)

[demmiblue]

47. My problem is that the hosts don't shut down these types of posts. n/t

[demmiblue]

70. Transparency: I did alert on this post.

Enough whining about other DUers!

If you want to do so, perhaps you should ask the admins to reinstate META. Otherwise, stick to the issues.

[babylonsister]

77. ProSense STICKS TO ISSUES. Other people

around here don't like the issues she/he sticks to. Tough.

And you alerted on this?

[demmiblue]

94. Yes, I alerted on this.

You are clearly not sticking to the issues. The sole purpose of your OP is WHINING about other DU members.

I am sure that many of us here are sick and tired of this type of OP.

Like I said, if you want to go about it this way, petition the admins to reinstate META. I know they won't, though, because they are also pretty sick and tired of this same type of bullshit.

[WillyT]

48. I Agree... WE, May Disagree... She May Be Exasperating At Times, But She's One Of The Hardest...

Working Posters On DU, A Longtime Loyal Member, And An All 'Round Good Egg!

She deserves better than she's been getting lately.



& Rec !!!

[Bobbie Jo]

50. Recommended!

Love ya, Pro!


....and babylonsister,

[DesMoinesDem]

51. I have a big problem with some of you and ProSense too.

[babylonsister]

64. Put us on ignore. Your pov would get magnificent! nt

[DesMoinesDem]

93. No, I prefer to call apologists out.

[Demo_Chris]

52. I disagree with virtually everything she posts but I admire her for doing so. nt

[babylonsister]

54. When I first found DU, I got a good learnin'.

Don't EVER post something from someone else without a link, and don't EVER link to certain sites. Well, through trial and error, I 'get' it. I remember one of my first attempts at sharing was a Krauthammer article. Oye, did I ever get lambasted! And learned. Pro has been here for many years. Stop trying to make this person less than she is, and less than what she contributes. Thanks.

[Corruption Inc]

142. Stop trying to tell people how to think, thanks.

People can make up their own minds, post without posting a link to something, discuss things rationally and can read the terms of service to understand what's expected on DU.

My observation of the poster mentioned in your OP is not favorable at all, regardless of how long they've posted here and regardless of your allegiance to them. None of what you posted changes the content of what that poster posts.

[HangOnKids]

148. Though I abhor religion I say AMEN

Rock on brother.

[quinnox]

57. So is general discussion the new Meta forum?

Awesome. Let the games begin!

[Life Long Dem]

59. Thanks, ProSense.

[CakeGrrl]

71. K/R for ProSense

You'd think people could "Hide Thread" if something isn't to their liking - that's its purpose.

[Safetykitten]

74. I get disparaged all the time by ProSense, and I find it calming, and like a shining light...

in the dark. Comforting and always there.

[stevenleser]

76. Whatever floats your boat. I would feel uncomfortable if someone with facts and links disagreed with

me all the time.

Fortunately I am not in that position.

[stevenleser]

75. The rule should be, if you are going to accuse someone of being a paid shill, back it up with proof.

Be able to prove who this person is in real life and that they are taking money from someone to post.

[Safetykitten]

86. I never presumed this person was a paid shill.

[Number23]

78. Thank You! And to all of the "jurists" that have allowed the nastiest, most blatant personal attacks

against Prosense to stand just because you "don't like her," GROW THE HELL UP.

Sid Dithers is another one. People post shit about Sid in threads he's NOT EVEN PARTICIPATING IN. And jurors let them stand. This kind of behavior is just completely immature and unnecessary.

[morningfog]

102. To be fair, sid rarely ever "participates" at all.

[Safetykitten]

115. True, he posts some "fail" type thing and laughs and laughs, he's so talented at that stuff...

you know the hilarious stuff.

[frylock]

134. well played

[Number23]

145. So all these people hate him for absolutely no reason at all? Good to know. Says good things about

the quality of their lives.

[rhett o rick]

112. I believe the opposite to be true. Juries love Pro. nm

[Marrah_G]

80. If I have a big problem with people I ignore them

I've had Prosense on ignore for years so it's no longer a problem for me. We all have people who we just can't stand. Ignoring is easier then constant bickering with people you will never agree with.

[akbacchus_BC]

84. babylonsister, Pro only copy and paste, I have yet to see

her personal opinions! Correct me if am wrong!

This is DU, is it owned by someone else or by you?

Please clarify!

[Safetykitten]

92. They are mostly party line missives, other than the wild "coward" throw at a person that risks all

to shine light in some cracks.

[Cha]

131. I've seen plenty of ProSense's opinions.. and, what

is wrong with bringing good interesting political articles to DU? That highlight what's actually going on in D.C?

I would not be seeing any of these articles if she hadn't posted them.. I have been educated politically over the years, thanks to ProSense, babylonsistah, and others who are dedicated posters.

[tandot]

85. Thanks, Babylonsister!

Love it ... or leave it ... why is that so hard for some people.

[sheshe2]

88. I will Kick and Damn well

Recommend!

Thank you, babylonsister.

This has been pissing me off, big time.

Well said!

[Tx4obama]

95. Thank you ProSense for all the time and work you put into your posts :)

It is much appreciated by me.

[R. Daneel Olivaw]

97. All I can say is if you don't like it then you should take to your own advce.

Love it or leave it, but get over it!

Don't like it? Move on.


It ain't gonna change, sister.

I mean this in the most amicable way possible.

[cheapdate]

98. Big love for babylonsister and prosense!

It's why I come here -- to hear an intelligent exchange of ideas, arguments, and counter arguments.

[longship]

99. Yup! I have to support this sentiment.

I too have noticed the childish responses in ProSense threads. I have on occasion taken some of them on for personal attacks.

My question is why such personal attacks pass DU standards. They really do make DU suck sometimes.

And those blue links are what makes a well resourced post. I appreciate them because they take some effort and make things easier for me. They are well appreciated.

[alcibiades_mystery]

100. They can't argue with ProSense, so they accuse her of being a "plant." Pathetic beyond description

This type of shit never used to fly when there was solid moderation, rather than a frothing lynch mob, looking out for basic civility on DU. Now the Reccing Crew know that they can probably land three of their ilk on a jury, so they say whatever. Some huge percentage of responses to ProSense's posts are now "this person is being paid" or some similar nonsense. As soon as I see somebody say that, I know I'm dealing with somebody who ProSense has absolutely destroyed in an argument, because only a pathetic loser would resort to such responses.

[Safetykitten]

107. So everyone that disagrees with this person lacks "civility?" I am having the vapors.

[alcibiades_mystery]

114. Huh?

I said "Anyone who disagrees with ProSense lacks civility?" Where'd I say that? Only in your imagination. Plenty of people disagree with ProSense in perfectly civil ways. Indeed, many of them are commenting on this very thread.

However, I did say that anyone who accuses her of being a paid plant is pathetic loser, and I stand by that description 100%. Why, are you in the habit of accusing her of being a paid plant? Or worse, is that your definition of disagreement?

[Safetykitten]

116. I never said this person was a paid plant or shill...where did I say this person was one?

[madrchsod]

103. ? i finally started agreeing with her....

throughout the years i have had issues with what she posted. most of the time i just did`t respond. in the last year or so i`ve agreed with what she has posted most of the time and actually told her so.

as for posting links to back up what she posts...try doing that sometime.

[DevonRex]

104. I love you both. Thanks for being such a nice person.

[Prism]

108. I keep thinking ProSense is a toothpaste.

And figured DU was just passionate about oral hygiene.

[quinnox]

113. lol

Here is all you need to know - prosense was once referred to as "the linkosaurus" and it caused much widespread amusement, because it basically summed it up rather wittily.

[nadinbrzezinski]

110. I solved the problem

She can post all she wants...I just don't have to see it.

It works well for both of us. In fact, using that list has been a god send.

[BlueStreak]

117. A philosophical dilemma

Certainly "ignore" is an option. But I really don't like to ignore people. I only ignore those who I think:

a) are here just to make noise about a single issue (women's rights, gay rights, criticizing solar power, or what have you). I may support most of those positions, but I just don't have time for small-minded one-issue zealots from the right or from the left.

b) people who only seem to be interested in stirring up shit and never want to consider another point of view

I really don't like to ignore any others, and the people discussed above don't pass my "ignore test". It is a dilemma. How does one balance the desire to be open to others' viewpoints versus the feeling that a particular poster is consistently a waste of time?

[nadinbrzezinski]

119. We all solve the problems in different ways.

It took me years to finally do it...and it worked well for both of us.

I admit I will use it more than some, but in some cases it is best.

[Sognefjord]

118. This whole thread is largely a list of apologists.

Yes, it will serve well to avert gnat bites from them and also lower one's blood pressure.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

120. Have I missed something?

What are you talking about?

[demmiblue]

125. PUI

[Rosa Luxemburg]

130. ?

[demmiblue]

132. A wee bit tipsy (IMO) n/t

[LibDemAlways]

121. I have always assumed that ProSense is connected

in some way with the Obama administration. She is a tireless advocate for the President -- as is her right. I have an equal right to disagree with or ignore her posts when I think she's wrong. No one here should have to "move on" simply because they disagree with a particular poster. I hope that's not really what you meant.

[OnyxCollie]

122. Shill all you want.

But don't expect respect.

That comes from principles, not servitude.

[quinnox]

126. + 1000

[Mojorabbit]

133. + a gazillion. nt

[Corruption Inc]

136. Excellent point

The principles at the core of all the issues is what used to identify people as democratic voters. It seems many people here (the shills) could care less about any issue other than blind loyalty, which is historically a republican principle. The "shills" are too blind to even see that and will never get any respect because of it.

[DeSwiss]

144. But with ''principles'' you have to look backwards to the past and your foundation......

...and we're only allowed to look forward. Forward to SS cuts. Forward to Medicare cuts.

- And best of all, tax cuts for rich corporations to fill their Cayman accounts with!

[Enrique]

124. DU isn't generally about spin

most of us just say what we think, we're not trying to spin each other.

[quinnox]

129. I think so as well

When I see a pro-sense thread, I usually just consider it like a white house press release. Something to look at and quickly move on...

[frylock]

135. copy+paste

<a href="whitehouse.gov">"Facts"</a>

[whatchamacallit]

150. +1

[JimDandy]

138. META META META META META META META!

A Pro-post for ProSense, which is really data for Meta. Apropo for someone who is proficient in posting pro-metadata threads.

[SidDithers]

140. DU rec...

Inb4 the completely inconsistent GD Hosts shut this thread down for being meta, while leaving other meta threads alone.

Sid

[HiPointDem]

146. no one is preventing her from posting her stuff.

[Puzzledtraveller]

149. I love pot roast but it never fails

I always get a strand of meat stuck in my teeth. Eventually it works itself out if I'm unable to get it out with a toothpick. Sometimes I get carried away and so annoyed at it that I pick at it more often making it hurt worse and causing the gum to bleed when I should just take a breather and let it work itself out on it's own. Even though this is almost guaranteed to happen every time I eat pot roast I still eat it, despite the occasional irritant it is still worth it.

[uppityperson]

151. Locking as most of GD Hosts weighing in and numerous alerts consider this META.