= new reply since forum marked as read
they have a right to the water in our aquifer, trying to force us to let them expand Poland Springs all they want, wherever they want in exchange for a few low-pay jobs. 
They lost suit after suit. I think they gave up after Christ sold out Florida. Their CEO is on record as saying that water is not a human right and should be sold for corporate profit.
This so-called trade agreement is truly frightening. It is such a total and complete sellout. There would be nothing left.
Hopefully there will be at least one -- it will only take one -- among those 1% elites who is not a sociopath and who will leak what is being hidden from us.
I did when I lived in Mass, but only because the municipal water where I lived was very poor quality. The reports consistently showed that it violated standards.
Now I have my own well, as do most Mainers. Wells and, in the western part of the state, cisterns. There are states that actually make cisterns illegal. Fortunately we are not one of them.
We have one of the best aquifers in the world, and depend on it for our agriculture and to live.
When I moved up here 10 years ago, in part it was because I knew there would be water. At the master gardener program, the director of the local extension office told us point blank that "water will be the oil of the 1st century." There will be wars over water. 
development and part and parcel of the "free" trade agreements.
Obama complied with NAFTA and allowed Mexican trucks and truckdrivers on our roads.
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/life/obama-makes-deal-let-mexican-trucks-us-highways
I don't know what has happened in that program over the couple of years since he did that, but isn't our trade deficit big enough already?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. trade deficit widened in April, as demand for foreign cars, cell phones and other imported goods outpaced growth in U.S. exports.
The Commerce Department said Tuesday that the trade gap rose 8.5% in April from March to $40.3 billion.
Exports increased 1.2% to $187.4 billion, the second-highest level on record. Companies sold more telecommunications equipment, industrial machinery and airplane parts, while U.S.-made autos and auto parts also rose to an all-time high of $12.8 billion.
But imports grew an even faster 2.4% to $227.7 billion. Sales of foreign cars increased to $25.5 billion. Americans also bought more consumer goods, led by big gain in foreign-made cell phones.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/06/04/us-trade-deficit-up/2387697/
The trade agreements are a big cover-up for inflation. The reality is that wages have at best stagnated and probably declined since 1973 or so. We can't on our wages pay ourselves to work for what we need in order to maintain our traditional living standard.
If we could only buy our own, American-made goods, we would be screaming about inflation. And there would be a huge fight over whether wages should go up so that working people could maintain a decent living standard or whether profits (those that go to the 1% as well as to pension funds and the investment "industry"
.
Here is a way-over-simplified explanation, but it gives the basic idea and is the best I can do at the moment:
Remember the inflation during the Carter and Reagan era. It was caused because the prices of raw materials, especially oil, went sky-high in 1973-74
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis
and again in 1979.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_energy_crisis
And of course other raw materials have also become more expensive over time.
After WWII, American industry was developed and intact. Our factories were up and running. European countries had lost a lot of production capacity during the war. They needed time to rebuild. Once their industrial capacity came back on board, fully on board, our labor was not as valuable as it was in the post-war years. There were other contributing factors like paying for the Viet Nam War, one of our worst mistakes ever.
We had inflation. In fact, the inflation caused a lot of people people to criticize Carter and vote for Reagan.
Despite a sluggish economy, inflation reached as high as 14.8%, and interest rates reached as high as 18% during the period 1977-1981. By 1985-1990, this contributed to the failure of Savings and Loan associations which had many bad loans, especially in real estate.
Of course, Carter had inherited the general inflationary trend from the Nixon and Ford adminstrations, which saw the beginnings of double-digit levels. President Ford had instituted the generally-ineffective program called WIN (Whip Inflation Now) in October, 1974. However, by November of 1976 the rate had subsided to 4.9% and was 5.2% when Carter took office. Continuous rises brought it to 14.8% in March, 1980, and 11.8% when Carter left office. Since 1982, general inflation has been suppressed below 6.5% and at times has been much lower.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_the_inflation_rate_under_Jimmy_Carter
So when Reagan came in, he faced both the high prices in an inflated economy and a recession. What did he do? He started trying to persuade Congress to go for free trade.
I distinctly remember a 1985 C-Span broadcast in which two senators were discussing free trade. One, who rejected the idea, said that if we adopted free trade, our economy would turn into just one American selling another American a hamburger. Guess what?
That's just about where we are.
But the low labor costs in foreign countries allow Americans to spend our worthless dollars and still get a decent lifestyle just barely.
This is not going to last. Sooner or later, we will have to pay the piper. The problem with our economy is not the government deficit. It is our trade deficit. It is the fact that American management and the major shareholders in companies make huge amounts of money from free trade, and if they had to pay Americans living wages to make America products, they would lose money.
So we are trapped into looking for ever cheaper labor markets to feed the fat stomachs of the multinationals.
And the real problem is that we have inflation and can't deal with it while sustaining the huge disparity in wealth in our country.
Sorry for the absolutely garbled explanation. Maybe someone else can explain this better.
But, basically, we import so much more than we export because our labor costs are high, and we would notice terrible inflation if we didn't import so much. Sooner or later our money will burst because our trade deficit is too great.
We need to bring about more paycheck equality at home. We don't have to revert to socialism, but we do need to have strong unions and a stronger manufacturing sector along with a weaker financial sector. We are like the person who develops a brilliant mind in a weak body. That person can survive -- but only with a lot of help from other people.
And so our country is overly dependent on the cheap labor and imports from other countries. This will not end well.
The last thing we need is another trade agreement. Instead we need to examine the wealth disparity in our country and the stranglehold that the multinationals have on us. We also need to learn to make better use of raw materials and to protect our environment. Let's take care of ourselves and our country. That's the best thing we can do for the world.
Sorry again for my inability to explain this as well as I would like to.
I wouldn't see them getting involved in a private agreement between consenting nations.
So, I imagine the US would wind up being the enforcer.
But would we be willing to go to war to protect the profits of the 1%?
Damn. I probably just answered my own question, didn't I? 
