Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 03:11 PM Feb 2012

So looks like the Dems caved to the GOP, cutting long term unemployment benefits

Unbelievable, after all the talk about "99ers" and how they still desperately needed help in todays economy, now the Democrats caved to the republicans in cutting down even more long term unemployment benefits from 99 weeks to 73 weeks. Way to go! (sarcasm) How could they give in to these slime dwellers, especially on this important issue of help to the long term unemployed. Very sad that even controlling the presidency and the Senate, which is more than half the power, the Democrats can't muster enough to draw a line in the sand and tell the GOP to go to hell instead of bending once again.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So looks like the Dems caved to the GOP, cutting long term unemployment benefits (Original Post) quinnox Feb 2012 OP
link please uponit7771 Feb 2012 #1
link - quinnox Feb 2012 #4
How ProSense Feb 2012 #6
All deals are "caving." Robb Feb 2012 #7
It's ProSense Feb 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Feb 2012 #2
Link? n/t FSogol Feb 2012 #3
Just because they have a (D) by their names does not mean they are Democrats. RC Feb 2012 #5
I need to start doing that, quoting myself with a link. Robb Feb 2012 #8
Harry, Nancy, Barack, and I assume Kent should be smacked for not indexing benefits to the UI rate TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #9
Extended ProSense Feb 2012 #11
In order to actually be indexed to the UI rate, it would also need to extend based on the rate TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #21
There's a new one every day, woo me with science Feb 2012 #10
How they propose to pay for it will just pit another group of people against each other. sad sally Feb 2012 #13
Kick woo me with science Feb 2012 #14
Is 73 weeks go past the next Presidential Inaguration? Rosco T. Feb 2012 #15
It's still well over a year... JSnuffy Feb 2012 #16
Kick. nt woo me with science Feb 2012 #17
Editorial: GOP caves on payroll tax cut ProSense Feb 2012 #18
When President Obama extended the Bush Tax Cuts for TWO additional years, bvar22 Feb 2012 #19
I'm lucky.....I have had a job the entire time we've had economic disaster hit the USA Sheepshank Feb 2012 #20
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
4. link -
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 03:23 PM
Feb 2012
http://news.yahoo.com/negotiators-reach-tentative-payroll-tax-cut-pact-000507483.html

the part I'm talking about: Negotiators agreed to reduce the number of weeks of benefits that workers would be eligible to receive if they lose their jobs. The maximum number of weeks of benefits in states with the highest jobless rates would be cut from 99 weeks to 73 weeks by the end of the year, said Josh Drobnyk, an aide to Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. How
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:28 PM
Feb 2012

"The maximum number of weeks of benefits in states with the highest jobless rates would be cut from 99 weeks to 73 weeks by the end of the year"

...is that a "cave"? Republicans wanted to cut it immediately to something like 63 weeks and drug test recipients.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. It's
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:53 PM
Feb 2012

"All deals are 'caving.'"

...a strange phenomenon. Everything is a win for the GOP.

Boehner has a bunch of unhappy caucus members at this point.

Response to quinnox (Original post)

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
5. Just because they have a (D) by their names does not mean they are Democrats.
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:16 PM
Feb 2012
We do need a second party.
A Liberal and Progressive Democratic Party. A real Democratic Party, representative of the people. Not the party of DINO's we have now.
With the DLC takeover of the Democratic party complete, moving to the Right far enough to Replace the Sane part of the Republican party (hence the Clown Car of Presidential candidates that is left of the Republican Party).
The DLC was dissolved last year because its job was done.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=13683

Robb

(39,665 posts)
8. I need to start doing that, quoting myself with a link.
Reply to RC (Reply #5)
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:32 PM
Feb 2012

I like the way that works. I've essentially read what you posted twice.

 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
9. Harry, Nancy, Barack, and I assume Kent should be smacked for not indexing benefits to the UI rate
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:39 PM
Feb 2012

rather than whatever lame game they were playing.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
11. Extended
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:50 PM
Feb 2012

"Harry, Nancy, Barack, and I assume Kent should be smacked for not indexing benefits to the UI rate

rather than whatever lame game they were playing."

...benefits are already indexed to high unemployment. If the rate drops below a certain point, it ends.

The fact that this doesn't kick in until the end of the year is a loss for Republicans. It's after the election and at the end of the current Congress. The issue is now moot.

 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
21. In order to actually be indexed to the UI rate, it would also need to extend based on the rate
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:07 AM
Feb 2012

Not just term if the rate falls below a certain level.

If you need extended benefits at 7.1% then it can never make sense to reduce or end the extension at any level above the initial redline.

I can't grasp at how the issue is moot to the millions of people out of work and that will be.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
10. There's a new one every day,
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:43 PM
Feb 2012

and there will continue to be a new one every day until we get the money out of our political system.

Occupy.

K&R

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
13. How they propose to pay for it will just pit another group of people against each other.
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 07:13 PM
Feb 2012

At a cost of $20-25 billion, extension of unemployment compensation is likely to be paid for in part with cuts to federal employee retirement benefits.

The "doc fix," the roughly $35 billion is expected to be offset with health spending cuts elsewhere in the budget, is an even dumber pay-for idea - take the money away from prevention (in the ACA) and Medicare payments to hospitals and nursing homes (kick those old sick and disabled people out!) and give it to doctors.

Rosco T.

(6,496 posts)
15. Is 73 weeks go past the next Presidential Inaguration?
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 10:06 PM
Feb 2012

if so, then it's subject to change right after the new congress/president.

that could go either way.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
19. When President Obama extended the Bush Tax Cuts for TWO additional years,
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 12:09 PM
Feb 2012

...the "compromise" was marketed and sold as:
It is absolutely critical that we get help to the Unemployed by extending these benefits,
even if it means giving MORE BILLIONS to the already very rich.


I guess helping the Unemployed is not so "critical" anymore.






You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
20. I'm lucky.....I have had a job the entire time we've had economic disaster hit the USA
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 12:14 PM
Feb 2012

and should have followed the UI issue closer, so please, someone fill me it a little and clear up any misconception.

My vague recollection is that UI was previously 73 weeks, and was extended to 99 weeks because to the extemely high unemployment and the dire immediate economic issues facing the country. Both situations are now trending more positive....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So looks like the Dems ca...