General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow do I know Zimmerman's a liar? Stating Trayvon said, "You got me!"
Straight out of some old black and white western or low budget crime movie where the "bad guy" issues forth with some cheap line like that.
That was clearly pulled out of his ass when being interviewed by police.
PDJane
(10,103 posts)Seems a bit overdone.
Hooray for Pepe
(30 posts)How long does it take to say "you got me"?
HipChick
(25,612 posts)H
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Hooray for Pepe
(30 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Trayvon may have been ALIVE for up to a couple of minutes. Then the doc mouths off with total speculation that he may have been conscious for a little bit anyway.
What does that mean? 5 seconds? 1 second? 30 seconds?
He didn't say the evidence clearly shows the guy was engaged in a 1 minute soliloquy. (look it up).
Hooray for Pepe
(30 posts)Your last post was proof that you did not visit that link at all.
Read: "The two doctors agreed that Trayvon remained conscious for a time. Anderson suggested the teenager may have been conscious for several minutes. Manion estimated it at just 20 to 30 seconds."
So despite the article mentioning 20 seconds as the minimum amount of time, you play dumb and ask if it was 1 second or 5 or 30. Where did you get the 1 and 5 from?
Then you say "Doc" instead of "Docs" (more than 1 doctor is plural), because you want people to think that only one doctor is being quoted.
Previously, someone made up that it was Zimmerman's friend saying that he was conscious for a while, without even waiting for the link. That one got egg on her face too.
Now relax, put on your reading glasses, and read.
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)in how long he was conscious. One says 20-30 sec, the other says maybe several minutes. Your use of "experts" is because you want people to think that both agreed it was 20 sec to several minutes but they disagreed on how long. It would be more accurate and less misleading to say experts DIFFER on how long he was conscious.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)you don't know. those doctors don't even know. what? is the point of you bringing this up, anyway? To defend this racist, lying killer? Just curious.
My original post wasn't even questioning whether he could have talked after being shot. Just saying that those words came from the barely functioning brain cells of an accused murderer trying to get away with it--not from Trayvon himself.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)no one. certainly not a black teenager. Nice that experts know he was conscious that long. How can they possibly know that? Oh, they can't.
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)Yup. Perfectly logical there. And about "nope". Those experts differed, did not say "20 sec to several minutes".
1 expert said 20-30 seconds, one said "several minutes". What you write implies they agreed "20 sec to several minutes" and they didn't.
Hooray for Pepe
(30 posts)?
2) were his vocal cords hit?
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)They need to be able to pass air through their vocal cords and mouth to talk. Having 1 lung collapsed and the other filled with blood does not give much if any time to talk. Try talking without passing any air out of your lungs. Say "oh gosh, you got me, you got it, you got me". Doesn't work, does it.
I notice you did not address my point about "experts say" vs "experts differ" on how long he MAY have been conscious for but instead ask about vocal chords. Odd, that.
edited for typo
Hooray for Pepe
(30 posts)2) At which point in time did the other lung fill with blood)
3) Do you feel the prosecution dropped the ball by not even suggesting your he-couldn't-speak theory made Zimmerman's claim unlikely?
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)will help the jury see that point. That this guy is living in a fantasy and virtually everything he said was either later contradicted by his own later words or by physical evidence.
Maybe that's how they'll nail this racist murderer to the wall.
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)anneboleyn
(5,626 posts)and then come back and tell us about how Trayvon was reciting Shakespeare, Lone Ranger dialogue, etc. as he died. Zimmerman's story, given the effects of that type of deadly, massive-trauma chest wound, are unlikely at best. The problem is that "you got me" makes it sound as though Trayvon was a cops-n-robbers "bad guy" who confessed while dying.
CatWoman
(80,290 posts)to posting pro zimmerman defense rebuttals in other threads.
busy little bee.
bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.............
FarPoint
(14,765 posts)so I seriously doubt he spoke a full sentence as stupid as that one.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Sure like..someone is going to sit up after being shot in the heart point blank and make dramatic 'old schools movie' statements of surrender. After the fearful and deadly experience of fear and dying that Martin had just gone through, I don't think so. Zimmermans has tried to use every trick in the book to shift the blame for his killing onto the victim and onto God himself.... Zimmerman's biggest fear,most likely, was that Martin might get the upper hand if he got ahold of Zimmerman's partner in crime, the gun.
JI7
(93,617 posts)or some other stupid line which seemed out of a lame action movie.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)unless it's for Lifetime or FX. They'll take any dialogue.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)From before he spoke to a lawyer. Originally Trayvon was an insane, motiveless killer who was hiding in the bushes (bushes which were later removed from the story because they didn't exist), who leapt out wordlessly and sucker punched him.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)His "story" of a random black man just lurking in the bushes, waiting to pounce on him, intent on murder just because?
That's textbook "black brute" right there. It ties in with the "criminal black man" as well.
Even if (and i think it's a very big if) Zimmerman had no preconceptions when he chased Trayvon, he was clearly more than willing to dig up Birth of a nation and gangsta Rap bullshit to build his version of the story. And since we heard more about Trayvon's grades and possible marijuana use, and not so much about Zimmerman's assault of cops and his girlfriend, it seems to have been a successful tactic... the media just loves the "evil black thug."
malaise
(296,114 posts):fisttbump:
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)As well as a former coworker.
No one in my family would ever call me a racist, not if you held a gun to their heads.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)The "you got me" moment is used in movies because it shows the bad guy's dying thoughts is the realization that the good guy bested him. But movies aren't reality.
It does go to show Zimmerman's belief that he was the "good guy," a crime-fighter protecting his neighbors from "fucking punk assholes." His words, not mine.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Zimmerman's voice while he was talking to a dispatcher and he was muttering to himself in an audible whispery voice "f##king coon". I don't believe my ears decieved me.
kittykitty
(1,091 posts)and "you're gonna die tonight", are right out of a B movie. Not something a black teenager from the 'hood would say!
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 3, 2013, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)
was learning that there was blood in his skittles -- so he had to have been holding them when he was shot. So we're supposed to believe he was fighting Martin and bashing his head while hanging on to his bag of Skittles?
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)They were in the front pocket of his sweatshirt with the iced tea. Showed that in the forensic photos. If blood got on them it was from the gunshot wound. If they had been in his hand they would have been on the ground where his phone and headset were. That blonde forensic tech person testified she took them and the can of iced tea out of that pocket. For some reason seeing her hold up the bag with the Skittles in it in court bothered me more than looking at his bloody sweatshirt or anything else.
rainy
(6,321 posts)clear that Travon had no intentions of attacking first. Obviously he would have put that stuff down if he was hiding and waiting to attack.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)The big pocket on the front of his sweatshirt. One of the officers that started CPR said he could feel the can of tea in his pocket, and the forensic tech woman who testified said she took both items out of that pocket.
However, both his cellphone and headset was found on the ground near his body separated from each other (they weren't still connected by the cord). That tells me that he was still on the phone with Rachel as she testified and that he was holding his phone in his hand while his headset was on his head. Nobody ambushes a person while holding their phone, wearing their headset and talking to someone on that phone. The headset and phone being found in the grass corroborates Rachel's testimony as well.
I absolutely believe that it was Zimmerman who put hands on Martin in some way first. I also absolutely believe that the moment Zimmerman thought he was in any danger of any kind from this kid he would have whipped out his gun. That's why people carry guns in the first place - to stop an attack from even happening. It was Zimmerman's gun that gave his the courage to get out of his car and chase Martin in the first place, and I'll never believe that he didn't draw it at the very first inkling that he was in any kind of danger from Martin. I also absolutely believe that Martin fought with him because he was already afraid of this creepy guy that was following him and that Zimmerman pulling a gun on him induced him to fight for his life with every belief that he was about to be shot by this nut.
I'm watching yesterday's testimony right now on YouTube, and O'Mara just confirmed that Martin was sitting on Zimmerman so high up that his knees nearly reached Zimmerman's armpits. How on earth could Zimmerman have gotten his gun out of his holster THEN with Martin's leg in the way? He would have had to go under Martin's leg that was pressed against his body and even Zimmerman said that he thought Martin felt the gun's presence against his thigh, or get his arm up an over Martin's thigh in order to whip out his holstered gun from his pants? He has normal length arms and would not have been able to reach his gun going over Martin's thigh. I absolutely believe that Zimmerman already had his gun in his hand and that was the whole reason for the physical altercation with Martin in terror trying to get that gun away from him. Which also makes me believe that the reason Zimmerman shot him was that he was afraid that Martin WOULD get it away from him.
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Jesus F. Christ, that's heartbreaking. Damn it. Damn it. Damn it.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)guys are way into corny 50s type dialog.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)I would imagine if he did say anything it would have been more along the lines of, "you f**king shot me", "OMG!", or something along those lines.
You got me? Get real.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Zimmerman lies. IF Trayvon was able to say anything at all after being shot, I'd imagine it would be begging for his life or crying in pain. Just thinking about that is horribly sad though, I hope it was so instant he didn't say anything at all.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)n
Rex
(65,616 posts)he buried himself with the jury imo, as soon as he opened his mouth and started lying his ass off.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)that some of the people commenting on this thread have no idea that their stereo typing of black teenagers is coming across as very racist.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Not something a youth, of any color, these days, would say.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I thought it was his father who said that. Either way, its pretty corny fake dialog. Sounds like an old gangster movie. But yea, it was pretty much the tipping point when we knew th Zimmermans were liars.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)a dirty rotten punk who wanted to kill with that replacement cock he had in the holster.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/01/jury-hears-zimmerman-claim-trayvon-said-you-got-me-after-being-shot-in-lung/
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...where that shit was flung against the wall.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)for up to several minutes (and likely in considerable pain) the autopsy also states that:
. the bullet perforated the right lung on entry
. one of the three bullet fragments further damaged the right lung.
. Both lungs were collapsed; it doesn't state partially collapsed with a percentage, so I'm guessing fully collapsed.
. 1300 mL of periocardial fluid filled the right lung and 1000 mL of periocardial fluid filled the left lung.
. While his heart continued beating, it forced his blood into the periocardial cavity
Based on my quick research at work yesterday, were he still able to breath at all, he would have been gasping for air. You can speak with one collapsed lung, but I couldn't find anything on both collapsed, and with the additional trauma, it would surprise me if he was able to vocalize at all.
I'll leave it to any doctors in here to comment on that.
Cause of death was that bled out into the periocardial cavity. Once he was shot it was unlikely he could be saved. CPR would simply have forced more blood out of his circulatory system.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Just my own personal opinion from calls for pts. with Cardiac tamponade or any kind of serious chest injury/condition. For a wound as critical as Trayvon's, I just can't imagine it ... thanks for this part of the autopsy report, I hadn't seen it.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)where conjured up by Zimmerman on the way to the police station.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)n
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)collapsed. At most, he would have had 1 breath to say "oh gosh, you got me, you got it, you got me". More likely he was able to make 1 "ahhhh" sort of noise and that was all.
Movies with heads not attached to bodies are wrong in that the head can not talk unless they are hooked up to something pumping air through their trachea, vocal cords, mouth. Same with lungs that are collapsed.
For those who wonder, breath out all the air in your lungs. At this point you still have air in your lungs but they won't compress further to push air out. Can you talk or make a noise except by clicking your tongue? Having collapsed lungs is the same. No air to push out. No talking, words, noise.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)The autopsy didn't indicate partial or full, so I'm speculating it was full. Especially given the amount of fluid inside his lungs.
You are correct, however, that it is air passing over the vocal cords that enables us to vocalize. No air movement means no voice.
The normal, resting volume of air capacity is approximately 500 mLs, with variations based on age and size. That is, a normal inspiration and normal expiration will inhale and exhale 500 mLs. During a forced inspiration, you can force up to 1600 mL total into your lungs. The periocardial fluid in Martin's lungs totaled 2300 mL. It seems unlikely with that much fluid forced into his lungs that he would have been able to vocalize.
Hooray for Pepe
(30 posts)More or less than what's needed for someone to vocalize "you got me"?
I estimate that "You got me takes about 1 second or half a second. Assuming Trayvon waited 5 seconds to say it, that's 6 seconds or so.
Hey, we're all guessing.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)why did you shoot me, you racist little cunt?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)the impact of the bullet from such a short distance would likely have been enough to force the air from his lungs for a full collapse.
My personal experience with being "winded," that is, all air pushed out of my lungs, vacuum lost and unable to inhale, was due to a double barreled kick to the chest by a horse at point blank range. I expect the impact of a bullet shot from a gun pressed to your sweatshirt is greater than a horse's kick. Just speculation here, on my part.
p.s. Enjoy your visit. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Around the 1:05 mark ...
Tanuki
(16,448 posts)and he had probably played out the whole scenario many times, cheesy dialogue and all, in his vigilante fantasies.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)in the position he was in despite his statements about what transpired. These experts should have done a much better job, in my opinion, in bringing home what an avoidable kill this was and that this guy has a history of resentment toward others not like him, and that he was somewhat of a nuisance to the local police with his vigilante bull calling in all kinds of nothing such as a little 8 year old black kid walking around the community.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)yet another reason to despise the murderous liar. why would anyone say "you got me?" the bastard is implying that Trayvon was indeed up to no good. zimmerman is complete scum.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)To paraphrase..."God made me kill Trayvon and Trayvon confessed to me that he was up to no good, and I was justified, so therefore I feel no remorse or regret ".
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)I hope he rots in jail. And that a few brothers in his cell block choose to acquaint him with what a REALLY BAD DUDE looks like and does--as opposed to the innocent teen, Trayvon.
raccoon
(32,390 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)for instance, what is ITA?
billh58
(6,655 posts)ITA means: I totally agree.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)but ITA escaped me.
raccoon
(32,390 posts)"They wouldn't do that," meaning that the character(s) wouldn't do/say what they did in the movie.
For instance, when the burglars in HOME ALONE kept on and on trying to get in the house after the little boy sets all sorts of booby traps on them--"They wouldn't do that."
Edited to add: Trayvon wouldn't have said that, is what I meant.
tavernier
(14,443 posts)The only thing I'm convinced of is that he did NOT say, "You got me".
That and forty other things.