General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, just to sum up, Assange is a rapist, Snowden's a narcissist and nut job, Greenwald's a pervert,
Last edited Sun Jul 14, 2013, 04:34 PM - Edit history (36)
and a liar AND a sociopath AND a pretentious little drama queen http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1002&pid=3256762 , Carter is past his time, Gore is irrelevant, the three NSA whistleblowers who tried to do it by the book and got nowhere are....EDIT: ....AND.
"Latin America is but a cyst on the anus of the world."
...apparently: http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10023172626#post29
pant, pant, pant.
WHAT a LOT of personality flaws.
Have I missed anyone or anything out? I'm sure I have.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Have I missed anyone or anything out? I'm sure I have."
...you missed Obama is a "douche."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023172329#post9
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023172329#post15
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)I never understood a single word he said
But I helped him drink his wine.
MsPithy
(809 posts)This was a belly-jiggling guffaw!
I, of course, do not have a belly that jiggles. She said, while drinking her beer.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)not the nozzle or the bag? just the douche?
unblock
(52,116 posts)but given that you probably have a personality flaw of some sort as well (hey, we all do), i guess we should all just dismiss your point out of hand and focus on that.
so what *is* your personality flaw?
huh?
huh?
ON PURPOSE.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)AmBlue
(3,103 posts)Ya think?
treestar
(82,383 posts)who apparently think the only "transparency" is to have no national security or state secrets whatsoever, a standard they apply only to the United States of America - other countries are always led by heroes who would never do anything to protect their countries from outsiders and are in USA complete control anyway.
They are willing to see evil in our every doing and also all three have a penchant for demanding the world give them attention.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)"While the form of treachery varies slightly from case to case, liberals always manage to take the position that most undermines American security."
The convergence of the third way and the neocon is nearly complete.
Why pal? Just a reminder.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3177407
treestar
(82,383 posts)You're like right wing parodies of the left. So deranged about the US having any security at all that it makes right wingers look right when they claimed we hated America.
You and she could argue all day and maybe agree on some things - extremists usually do.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)The equivalency that makes your position extremely questionable is:
"the US having any security at all" being represented by applying a Hoover (both machine and tactic) to everything electronic you can lay your hands on on a legal basis which must remain secret.
You show zero sense of proportion in any of our exchanges today. Calling out one secret is hating the concept that a state might have one. Calling out one questionable tactic is leaving us defenseless.
Calm down before you have a heart attack!
Furthermore, you already made it clear that you feel some kinship for Ann -- certainly you are excited by the same displays of power as she is. Too late to try to spin it around.
And trust me, during Bush I FORCED myself to read her crappy books to learn the mindset of the last set of authoritarian thugs. You want to echo her? Awesome, cause I can point that out. In that way, I am just like an NSA database....
cali
(114,904 posts)so bent out of any form of reasonable thinking about any criticism of the president that you actually reference Ann Coulter approvingly.
(you can call other duers deranged and get away with it. I can't)
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts). . . it's just pining for the Snowden.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)THANKS.
EDITING.
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)Franklin.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)All these awful people.
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)I am reading his autobiography and the guy was a habitual line stepper
dionysus
(26,467 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)"he was always stepping over the line... he was a habitual line stepper"
Aerows
(39,961 posts)to those people that can't be objective about the information they released.
Oh wait, this is about their personalities, then yes, they are horrible people if one chooses to see them that way subjectively.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It is about whether the US should be sucking up all our electronic data.
That is the problem.
Clearly, it should not.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Another tidbit ignored by the authoritarians is that the government is doing this on the sly
This should rile up the natives of constant poutrage.
lately seems to be "anything that make the President look bad". Mind you, none of them cared about it under Bush, but now we have a D and suddenly that makes all the difference.
Holy hannah, someone said something bad about the US that means they are attacking President Obama!
Good Lord, the man runs the free world, I think he can handle criticism.
Rex
(65,616 posts)and could handle such feedback (since we all know he spends 24/7 reading DU).
But some have heart failure at the thought that he might hear any criticism in this tiny little fishbowl.
Though I will say that this tiny little fishbowl means something since many choose to both fight in and belittle it.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)So did Obama. And then somebody got to him. Maybe Obama has a character fault that he doesn't want the world to know about. Anyway, somebody turned him, changed his mind about the wiretapping.
I oppose it regardless of the party.
Wiretapping and obtaining pen registers ---- all of it should be limited to specific instances, specific criminal investigations of people believed based on probable cause to be possible suspects in an existing criminal case.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)A decent psy-op tactic when you think about it.
You can deflect the actual rational discussion of an issue if you can replace all references to that issue by an emotional image.
That image can be created by associating the issue with a person and then destroying the person with personality foibles.
This tactic works work GREAT if you had a large, perhaps "electronic," repository of things that the person has done or said in their past that can be mined.
chrislindsay23
(10 posts)As these programs wear on in years(Psy-ops, Cointelpro, yes, even MKULTRA),the combat of dissent becomes itself complacent, grows heavy under its own weight. It becomes this machine that gobbles up everything in sight, but yields little in terms of results in real time. These are antiquated ideas.
Good police work foils terrorism. Not systems of intended, pre-cognitive control. One can aid the other, but these two things are not mutually exclusive. One does not, and can not replace the other.
What I mean is that the destruction of an assailant's character is to be expected. This is automatic... Old school.
The purpose of one who pits himself against something this big... Well, there have got to be a lot of emotional reasons that drives him, or her. They are neither traitors, nor heroes. They decide in a moment their course.
The important thing is the impact they provide. They crash the gates and lay themselves bare.
Who among us, put under a microscope, can be all things(flaws not included).
No one can. No one performs well under a microscope.
I tend to defer to Valerie Plame's perspective on Snowden's character, and the absolute irrelevancy of it all.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)be somewhere in that mix.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Not to mention his confusion about his sexual orientation!
Cheers!
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)And didn't you know, because he's mentally unstable, he deserved to be supermaxed and suicide-watched and stripped naked and prohibited from exercising and so on and so on and so on because MURICA! FUCK YEAH!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Because strip searching is a fabulous way to deal with mentally unstable people! SUPER DUPER!
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Are you an American living overseas, or a Scotsman?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I am a Scotsman.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Are we avoiding the subject of Salmond or are you a YES man, like me?
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)A SNP and a YES voter. But DU gives me a wee welcome break.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Freedom from Westminster and the whole snivelling pile of corporate crotch-sniffers! Good riddance to the whole craven lot of them!
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 6, 2013, 08:52 AM - Edit history (1)
In saying that their so used to the troughs and benefits there they will want to stay.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)lol! How British is he about to get?
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... Scott Ritter likes affairs with fake minors on the internet, etc., etc.
Yes, we all like to be distracted with the "messenger" instead of focusing on the problems they try to tell us about or guide us away from.
Yes, some of them were "bad" people, and as if that suddenly makes everything else they say or do "wrong". That's the way the PTB like to manipulate us! Works to well with too many people! And Snowden is the big target because he's going after and zeroing in on the very tools that the PTB uses to do all of these "distractions".
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)got my work cut out for me here, haven't I...
typetypetype
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)good point. the folks here are willing to defend this el gordo
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3172698
cali
(114,904 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)allin99
(894 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)The fact that the same group of people can post this demonizing, character-assassinating shit over, and over, and over, speaks very poorly for Democratic Underground.
More and more, I come to the conclusion that DU is no longer Democratic, and not Underground.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I've never seen so many people expend so much effort on such flimsy excuses for bad policy.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)ProSense, for example has over a hundred OPs bashing Snowden.
That isn't mere OCD.
That's a sign that he may be doing this for a living.
China's not the only nation out there with a Fifty Cent Party.
I'll bet good money that the Koch Brothers, or one of their many political front groups, are paying people to post shit like that.
Go to any major newspaper web site, and go to their comment sections (which are almost always poorly moderated, especially when the paper is run by hardcore conservatives) and you'll see gangs of teabagger sockpuppets bullying and attacking anyone disagreeing with them.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)the problem with paid internet commentators, the problem that somehow the people hiring them never seem to understand, is that all that happens is that their message is delivered plus counterargument. It's a disastrous strategy.
Also, working from a script when your opponent doesn't have to just makes you look increasingly ridiculous.
QC
(26,371 posts)Yes, someone here said that not long ago.
olddots
(10,237 posts)and Mona Lisa was a man .........mid tempo shuffle with stop times -key of G
we aren't our brother's keeper but jeez 7 billion brothers ?
malaise
(268,693 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)I didn't see that one...
malaise
(268,693 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font]
[hr]
sibelian
(7,804 posts)OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)the other 2 you got right, tho.
Sid
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)... typetypetype
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)triune godhead, infallible in all things.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)status pulled - (I'm not kidding you - that pearl of wisdom was stated right here on DU by one of the more prolific defenders of enhanced surveillance):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023092493#post131
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Forgot to say thanks! And what a consternation it caused me when I found that out about Amnesty! I'm so glad all these well-informed people are here to keep us straight...
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Her opinion means jackshit, she's a corporate shill, she makes America suck, she's an apparatchik, a hypocrite, and her opinion that Snowden is no hero is as funny as shit on a popsicle.
They're all in here somewhere:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023135753
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is more evidence that you do.
QC
(26,371 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)I'd be curious where you get owned by Rupert Murdoch
As to your assertion that the Guardian is right wing, they have been the biggest media critic of Murdoch in Britain.
They are the biggest critic of the present Prime Minister and his party.
They regularly criticized Bushco when he was president.
The had round the clock coverage of the phone hacking scandal
They've run at least twenty stories on Murdoch's secretly taped apology at the Sun
They opposed Murdoch purchasing Sky Cable
They have questioned for over ten years the relationship between UK politicians and Murdoch
They're hardly conservative and as far as I can find they're not owned by Murdoch
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)rpannier
(24,328 posts)my apologies
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Have a look at the link in post #40. It's Comedy Gold.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)In keeping with the theme of the thread.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)102. Good Bye and Good Riddance.
With all the "moral outrage" going on...WHY would Americans be supporting this guy and
the MURDOCH owned Guardian?
I could give a crap about this...if the NSA wanted the records I simply do not care...I call Mom's Cardiologist and check in at my work...analysis and listen away...I've NOTHING to hide.
What do all you "moral outrage" folks have to hide?
This whole thing is such bullshit, in a day and age of TERRORISTS that would love another 9/11.
I hope somebody kicks this worm's ass.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=504813
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Director of the Foundation for Information Policy Research (C Bowden) describes how blanket data retention is unlikely to be effective. I know hes talking with the (RIP) Act 2000 in mind. I wonder how far removed it is?
"surveillance via ISP and telephone traffic data can easily be evaded by using pre-paid (or stolen) mobile phones and web-based e-mail from public terminals to avoid identification. Organized criminals already routinely use the former, and reports of the modus operandi of the 9/11 terrorists indicate they used the latter. Web-based e-mail services can be provided via any website and will leave no trace with the ISP. They can be set-up on any computer with an always-on connection (domestic broadband is ideal), and there are thousands of examples large and small."
Even with:
"compel logging and retention extends beyond ISPs and telephone companies"
However
"Even such drastic measures would not eliminate possibilities for undetectable communication. The stealthy techniques of steganography (information hiding) allow messages to be camouflaged in sound, pictures, or other routine content in ways analogous to hiding a pebble on a shingle beach."
Brings up the question if these types of blanket data retention is next to useless against terrorism what is it for?
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=dltr
rpannier
(24,328 posts)my apologies
deurbano
(2,894 posts)by those who want to discredit and dismiss the Snowden revelations that have been published in the paper. (These posters are agreeing with your point that these are smears, not facts.)
DinahMoeHum
(21,774 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)It's difficult keeping track of who to hate. Thanks, sibelian!
Rex
(65,616 posts)Although I did love watching people flop all over themselves when Dennis HAD THE GALL to admit he believes in ETs. That one caused the Flat worlders to go flying off the handle!
Since we all KNOW that the Universe revolves around our solar system and no other!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Whom I adore in every good sense of the word.
As for UFOs, LongTomH brought up this big convention this weekend:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11355408
Me? They can call me crazy or a conspiracy theorist or anything else, I like to learn new stuff:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1135262
bvar22
(39,909 posts)believe the politicians who tell them that a benevolent Giant Invisible Hand of the Marketplace will reach down from the heavens and "Correct Mistakes in the Free Market"
....but ONLY if we take ALL the regulations off of the corporations.
(Those regulations your fathers and grandfathers shed BLOOD to put in place).
Unidentified Flying Objects actually exist.
There is absolutely no proof of the existence of a giant Invisible Hand of the Marketplace.
In fact, all available evidence suggests that the Invisible Hand is nothing more than a giant fraud.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)So many appalling America haters. What's to be done?
I have, with great sorrow, added your observation to my list.
SHAME ON YOU, DENNIS. SHAME.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)My guess, it's something to do with Craft International. The mercenaries for hire were started by a famous sniper and evidently had a presence in Boston that horrible day.
Perhaps you remember, arely staircase, DU had a thread on it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023119333
Marr
(20,317 posts)Apparently everyone else is just some brand of lunatic or hater.
magellan
(13,257 posts)It's INCREDIBLE how much cleaner the place is without their pom-pom litter everywhere.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I think there are a few left who seem to be at least trying to make sense.
magellan
(13,257 posts)I see them in all their high kick glory again. Rah, team!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I'm too old for this crap!
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)tsuki
(11,994 posts)obxhead
(8,434 posts)Then they will all be quoted and loved by all on DU again.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)through the power of HEALTHY ROBUST DEBATE.
They tell the truth.
The reality is they are saying the same things today they said in the last decade.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)but some people prefer to see things differently, until it's expedient not to.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)The kind that are grateful for your service.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)we must add that to Greenwald's fast-growing list of "major character flaws"
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Please click here.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)And anyone else that has something inconvenient to say that doesn't fit the approved national dialog.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Until we quit shooting the messenger, we have problems...
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Perhaps I should start a seperate thread detailing Hilary's personality flaws?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)More like:
Welcome & Help
Latest Breaking News
Good Reads
Video & Multimedia
Politics 2013
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
Ask the Administrators
Hillary The Neocon
It MIGHT fit everyone's opinion.
mettamega
(81 posts)Carter is the only one talking sense about Fundamental Religions, sadly Gore and our planet well-being has become irrelevant - and the rest is beyond commenting on as it is senseless mind melt
sibelian
(7,804 posts)do you see this thing here --->
I HATE IT.
Hate. HATE. With a fanatical loathing bordering on the obsessive.
PLEASE don't make me use it...
annabanana
(52,791 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Poor America.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Members of Du have predicted the demise of America for a long time. Predictions here are not worth much.
DADT was never going to end.
Iraq was never going to end.
The stock market was going to crash.
The double dip recession was predicted every summer since Obama took office (until this year).
Social Security has been killed (almost) 10 or 15 times.
America is going to be just fine. DU outrage tends to be a contra-indicator.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Oh.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
You know, I have this sneaky feeling that that sentence has a strange, counterintuitive relation to my OP.
I'm kind of mentally feeling my way through this idea at the moment and I can't quite put my finger on it.
Hmmmmm.
I'l get back to you.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)observation relative to your response to my prior post as to the state of America.
But feel free to get back to me.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Are you quite sure?
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)But not for the families of those who lost their loved ones there; or for the service people who have life long injuries.
And it will be a hell of a long time before the matter ends for the Iraqis.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Obama did not start the Iraq war, but he did end it on the same timeline that he ran on, even though many here on DU said he would never end it.
Many of the folks who are the most outraged here on DU now, made those predictions.
TheKentuckian
(25,020 posts)We still maintain a substantial footprint.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Thanks.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)more of a bulge, or a lump.
johnnyreb
(915 posts)And the colonists, too.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)No, even worse than that, HIPSTERS!!!
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,284 posts)Thanks for the thread, sibelian.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)I'm disappointed in him.
typetypetype
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...because what else could it be?
probably narcissism. It's almost always narcissism.
I mean I'm a narcissist. I think. That last sentence began with "I". How narcissistic is that?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)despite spending time, money, and my vote on a black man for president. Twice. I suppose I am also a sexist because I'm pissed that HRC is trying to get the TPP passed. Meh. I am lucky to have lived long enough to set my own standards and live by my own principles that stay the same through different presidents.
For you BOGers: I hate George W Bush. I am disappointed in the current president.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... "Constitutional Fundamentalist."
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Defend the Constitution and you're some sort of fanatic.
What do we need laws for anyway? We have Obama! And we'll always have him!...oh, wait...
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)typetypetype
QC
(26,371 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)If that had been said about Africa the jury would have seen it for what it is.
Well.
I didn't know that...
typetypetype
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)This saga reveals the true colors for the members of DU.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)This site has always had more than it's fair share of contributors who are here primarily to stir shit up and cause crap. The loathing for for the left is getting clearer and clearer by the day.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)Isn't Alan Grayson a drunk?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)typetypetype
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Right? Amiright? Right?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Thanks ever so!
typetypetype
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)but we need an entire new fricken INTERNET to deal with how folk communicate about homosexuality, particularly on the left.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)Add all this up and it gives one a feeling of Déjà vu. Let's see... Oh yeah. Back in the 90s and 2000s when I was posting to a Usenet forum with liberals and conservatives posting to it.
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. could add to the list.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I was playing around with buttons on the Internet and POP.... gone she was, never to be seen again.
I do hope I haven't made some awful mistake.
QC
(26,371 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)How dare he pretend to care about the downtrodden!
QC
(26,371 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Obviously a liar for cash.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I totally forgot!
thaaaaank YOU
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Karl Rove said so.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)plutocratic slave-owners whose Constitution isn't worth the paper it's printed on
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)You forgot that.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)My poor fingers are being typed off to the knuckle as it is!
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Blanks
(4,835 posts)I want to be clear on my position on Snowden. This kind of behavior should not be viewed as heroic.
It is something completely different to reveal secret information to the press and insist on anonymity than it is to reveal secrets and be viewed as a hero.
Young people who commit suicide receive a lot of attention after the act and sometimes spur 'copy cats'. Its dangerous to give someone a lot of positive attention for doing something illegal.
If people are willing to commit suicide because they see how much attention it gets - revealing government secrets for attention seems a much less permanent way to get a lot of positive attention.
Not everyone who thinks Snowden shouldn't be getting a lot of positive attention is a troll. As far as using Manning as an example for why Snowden did it the way he did, we shouldn't know who he is either.
People should watch 'All the Presidents Men' (or read the book). I remember when some old guy died (and I'd never heard of him). The only reason it was in the news was because he was suspected of being 'deep throat'. That's how one effectively stops corruption - anonymously.
Anyone saying that Snowden should be seen as a hero isn't thinking it through. I don't care if it is Jimmy Carter (a man that I have a lot of respect for), wrong is wrong.
As far as the secrets he revealed, I wasn't surprised or appalled by them. Oddly, I thought everyone knew that this kind of thing was going on. That doesn't mean I like it, but we could have just as easily gotten the information from an anonymous source.
I wouldn't expect it to stop either, people will modify their behavior now that they know, but there is no constitutional guarantee of privacy (according to my attorney). I guess we could start a petition, but I wouldn't count on that stopping it either.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)>>>Its dangerous to give someone a lot of positive attention for doing something illegal. >>>>
Dangerous for whom and what? Depends on the stakes and circumstances, seems to me. Rosa Parks' illegal acts were dangerous to the established order of Montgomery and of the old south. Now most people ...even there... recognize the imperative of that "illegal" behavior.
And of the attention paid to it.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)No, I don't think he's a hero. Someone used him as an example for how whistle blowers are treated as a justification for the inappropriate behavior of Snowden. I can see; based on my last post, how you might come to that conclusion, but that is not my opinion.
I believe that heroes are an invention of the media to manipulate people into a certain behavior. To get us to feel a certain way about things.
Rosa Parks simply refused to move to the back of the bus. She didn't choose to be a hero, she was just tired. She was chosen as a symbol for the movement because her character was above reproach.
I expect she would have been content to remain anonymous similar to the guy who brought the 'watergate scandal' to the forefront (one of the reasons why she was such a good symbol).
As far as the pentagon papers, it was leaked to the press, and the press sought legal advice - choosing to publish because they felt that they were protected under the first amendment 'freedom of the press' protection.
There is a difference between believing that something was handled correctly and believing that the person who handled it is a hero. Some things should be revealed to citizens - I'd rather they were revealed by people who have met with others and decided the merits and evaluated the downside. This is how it was handled in the pentagon papers and the watergate scandal, and by the people who selected Rosa Parks as their symbol for the injustices created by hatred based solely on race.
A lone cowboy trying to single-handedly right the wrongs of the world is the model I disapprove of. I suppose it gets all the libertarian's blood to pumping, but as a method of problem solving (see Ron Paul's accomplishments in congress for an example), it is completely ineffective.
That's my beef about the whole Snowden thing, revealing the secrets (to the press) is ok, revealing the secrets in the manner that he did is not ok. Since I don't believe in heroes at all; the entire debate about whether Snowden is a hero or not - is a complete waste of time.
If we treat him like a hero; how many other dumb asses can we expect to step forward with government secrets and expect a ticker tape parade?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Oops, thought I was on jury duty, sorry!
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)... and was probably some kind of pinko, commie or commie symp.
(This sort of thing has a long tradition.)
K and R
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Here in this thread, we've identified their talking points.
It's a recurrent pattern.
Don't forget.
"Occupy is filled with dirty commie hippies who are raping people and doing drugs!"
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Thanks for that.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Yesterday, they've been calling him "GeeGee" and the like.
They let their masks slip.
Yeah, I have a question for Skinner: What the fuck are they still doing here? I thought the rule on DU was "No trolling" and "No right-wingers."
sibelian
(7,804 posts)didn't see...
I don't think Skinner's in a position to just dump them all but there's probably a case to be made for banning at least one of them...
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Looks like this happened last week, rather than yesterday. But yeah. For a while the McCarthyists were calling Greenwald "GG", "GeeGee" or "GiGi" - clear homophobia.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)gay myself, from UK.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)You missed that part.
Nicely done!
allin99
(894 posts)can't find the post to link, but others saw it as well.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)It never ends!
what have I done???
typetypetype
QC
(26,371 posts)unlike The Guardian and the ACLU.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Blah blah blah.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)typetypetype
Autumn
(44,980 posts)... what if it lasts FOREVER?
EEEEEEK.
Maybe they'll make a movie out of it and I'll be rich and famous...
Autumn
(44,980 posts)Who do you want to play your part? I know you are a Scotsman but I kind of have a thing for Johnny Depp. Do you mind?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)But as it's your imagination, cast who you like!
Anyway, it'll be a crazy 1970s science fiction dystopia with the final shot tracking back slowly and shakily with sinister beepy electronic music and me screaming "WHAT HAVE I UNLEASHED???" surrounded by crowds of lefties with lists of every single criticism ever levelled at the left...
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Gotta be careful - saying things means you end up with people's valuable ATTENTION, which is the same as STEALING.
It's important.
typetypetype
QC
(26,371 posts)Then she suddenly became a horrible person.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)There's loads of people on this site that think the NSA's surveillance programme is a bad thing, and I just thought that, you know, by now, SOMEONE in the public eye would have stepped forward to criticise it, like we're all doing, and that that person would NOT have some awful, neurotic, glaringly hideous twist of the soul that completely and incontrovertibly devalues everything they say. and there's NO-ONE. There must be someone SOMEWHERE. It's just such a weird coincidence that in every single instance of public criticism of such things the critic is some kind of WEIRDO.
What's a lefty to do, huh? What's a lefty to do?
DESPAIR.
SIGH.
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)I'm not 100% sure I've seen that here on DU. Maybe someone else will remember.
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)typetypetype
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)okay. That makes no sense.
typetypetype
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)(Something upbeat!)
sibelian
(7,804 posts)It's impossible to debate with someone who just repeatedly tells flat out porkies.
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Foreigners are stealing American jobs!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Scotland...
UTUSN
(70,645 posts)Since I'm not clear from the Urban Dictionary definition below and from the way it was used on one of my (anti-)SNOWDEN posts whether it was being addressed to MY post itself or to my take-down of the poster I was addressing. Was it approving of MY post (since I'm not a newbie and my take-down was of a newbie), but if so why was it Replying to MY post instead of "plonking" at the newbie? However, given this O.P., I'm fairly sure it was disapproving of MY post. **plonk" on me!1
**********QUOTE********
1. plonk
Cheap wine
2. plonk
from: the on-line hacker Jargon File, version 4.2.3:
plonk excl.,vt. Usenet: possibly influenced by British slang
`plonk' for cheap booze, or `plonker' for someone behaving stupidly
(latter is lit. equivalent to Yiddish `schmuck') The sound a (newbie)
makes as he falls to the bottom of a (kill file). While it originated
in the {newsgroup} talk.bizarre, this term (usually written "*plonk*"
is now (1994) widespread on Usenet as a form of public ridicule.
St00oid is as st00pid oes. *PLONK*
3. plonk
The sound a user makes as it hits the bottom of another user's killfile bin
Some AOL user wrote:
> (snipped pointless drivel)
*PLONK*
*************UNQUOTE******
Kurovski
(34,655 posts)(I just wish to point out to Anonymous that I hold no such belief and further, that I love cats and they love me.)
Thank you for you contributions...
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)when will we see your like again?
Thanks for this post! Bestest ever.
sibelian
(7,804 posts).... heeeelp....
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)will give you carpal tunnel...made me LMAO though. Thank you! After the last few weeks it was much needed relief and perspective.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)mental health problems *here*, narcissists and related variants *here*, sexual deviants *here*...
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Clearly we both have excellent taste in video. Between the dogs and the lighting-geniuses-with-a-lot-of-time-on-their-hands (I won't say "too much" given the results) it is a masterpiece. The sheep walking, and the fireworks are my favs...
QC
(26,371 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Won't be long before they just come straight out and call him a "degenerate" or a "subversive"...
QC
(26,371 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)And Billy Bragg lives in a big house. Fucker.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Who has made this observation, and where....?
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Hedges, Greenwald and Benjamin, too:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3043387
The Billy Bragg slams took place around when Thatcher kicked the bucket.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)And look who it's from, no surprises there...
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)you got that right. No surprises at all...
sibelian
(7,804 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Naughty old Ellsberg is a career activist! Dearie tut!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3219756
Silly old Daniel. Still reaching for a bite at that sweet, sweet relevance.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Kickarooni.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Like an Arp galaxy, that collision.