Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:28 PM Jul 2013

BWHAHAHAHA: Marijuana Can Cause Violence According To George Zimmerman’s Attorney



Morons still pushing this crap!!



Piers Morgan this past Monday night had as his guest the defense attorney for George Zimmerman, Mark O’Mara, to discuss his client’s case. The discussion went very odd quickly, when the discussion turned to marijuana use. Here’s the video:






Mark O’Mara had these gems to share:

Any level of pot in his system could have some effect. And of course that falls in line with what Zimmerman stated in his first couple of moments with the non-emergency operator when he said that it looks like he’s on drugs or something.

When Piers Morgan pressed for more information, Mr. O’Mara continued:

Well, actually, there are some studies out there — particularly with young males — that suggest that even low levels of cannabis use can lead to aggression. So, the question is not how much, but if in fact there has been some effect and if that effect was noticed by George Zimmerman then I think it is relevant. After all, if we’re going to talk about what George Zimmerman may have read in coursework two, three, four years ago then I think what Trayvon Martin had smoked or had in his system somewhere between two and four hours before the event is certainly something the jury should consider.



And then it was brought up that George Zimmerman himself was not tested, a fact which the lawyer dismissed. This is a highly unorthodox tactic by the legal team, and one which could backfire on them very badly. As found on the Honolulu Civil Beat, while there have been studies which do indicate a link between marijuana and violence, the link is not to the drug itself, but to the illegal trafficking of that drug. Studies on the actual effects of marijuana itself are inconclusive, but trends show a reduced level of violence for marijuana users.


The argument that marijuana leads to violence is not a new one. A famous exploitation movie, Reefer Madness, was even created on this idea. The resulting movie has become a running joke for its campy production values, unrealistic depictions, and has been spoofed on stage and screen since rediscovery in 1971. Unfortunately, a lot of the sensationalized claims it made over marijuana have persisted. You can watch this movie, now in the public domain, for yourself here:






cont'



http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/09/marijuana-can-cause-violence-according-to-george-zimmermans-attorney/
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BWHAHAHAHA: Marijuana Can Cause Violence According To George Zimmerman’s Attorney (Original Post) Segami Jul 2013 OP
Not smoking marijuana can cause violence NoOneMan Jul 2013 #1
LOL! Segami Jul 2013 #2
No shit. Violence can happen without any drugswhatsoever. lumpy Jul 2013 #25
I don't care if Trayvon had angel dust or crack in his system NightWatcher Jul 2013 #3
+1 truebluegreen Jul 2013 #10
Exactly! Stargazer09 Jul 2013 #27
I wouldn't be surprised if that hypocritical douche nozzle goes home after the trial and lights up. Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2013 #4
Of course thats bullshit. HooptieWagon Jul 2013 #5
Zimmerman was on various prescription drugs with known, violent side effects Segami Jul 2013 #14
Hopefully the judge allows that into evidence. HooptieWagon Jul 2013 #15
That argument depends on jurors never having smoked pot BainsBane Jul 2013 #6
It just takes one. dkf Jul 2013 #7
Dude, you're doing it wrong! AtomicKitten Jul 2013 #8
If weed led to violence madamesilverspurs Jul 2013 #9
"Morons still pushing this crap!!" PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #11
If you are a bag of Cheetos....... Motown_Johnny Jul 2013 #12
If anything I'm a real witch CatWoman Jul 2013 #13
I don't think the Judge should have let the defense bring that in, John2 Jul 2013 #16
Zimmerman has a history of violence...why aren't they looking into the policeman he beat up? HipChick Jul 2013 #17
Zimmerman's prior bads would be prejudicial JimDandy Jul 2013 #22
Only if you're a bag of Funyuns. n/t Butterbean Jul 2013 #18
Screaming Yellow Zonkers TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #34
Funyuns are fake fried onion rings. Kurovski Jul 2013 #36
oooo! Thanks for that! TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #37
If by violence you mean ... Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #19
I think you mean Honeybuns. Lots and lots of honeybuns. That's my recollection, anyway. nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #29
Don't forget the Funyuns. Yeah, Funyuns. nt Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #38
Seems To Me When You Mix Weed & Cops... KharmaTrain Jul 2013 #20
"..The request lines are now open..." Segami Jul 2013 #21
So will Zimmy be facing drug charges? Seeing as he SHOT AND KILLED someone? Scootaloo Jul 2013 #23
This is not about marijuana causing a person to be aggressive customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #24
Yes indeed. A try to influence the jury that Martin was a baddy. Dirty politics in court. lumpy Jul 2013 #28
GZ is probably going to skate customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #32
I don't think so. It supports GZ's report to 911 that the guy looked like he was on drugs or Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #30
We'll see what six Florida women feel about that customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #31
I don't think of FL as the south. (I'm from the deep south...it's very different from Florida). Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #44
Well, I have been briefly to a few places in Florida customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #48
You're right. I don't know what it is. nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #49
how do you suppose someone who smoked weed would look or behave to elicit such a conclusion? frylock Jul 2013 #33
You see, this is the problem with some people who are trying to parse evidence. Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #45
It looked like he was on drugs burnodo Jul 2013 #39
The jury, as fact finder, may decide just that, and disregard the toxicology report. nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #46
How does someone look high because they're walking slowly? Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #40
GZ didn't kill TM because he thought he was on drugs. Honeycombe8 Jul 2013 #47
except Martin had no idea whether he was an authority figure TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #35
To Martin customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #41
why do you think the jurors are dumb as a box of rocks? TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #42
I think that O'Mara customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #43
Exhibit B.S. Blue Owl Jul 2013 #26

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
25. No shit. Violence can happen without any drugswhatsoever.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:17 PM
Jul 2013

Wonder what kind of drugs was Zimmerman was using when he threw that woman across the room...

NightWatcher

(39,382 posts)
3. I don't care if Trayvon had angel dust or crack in his system
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:31 PM
Jul 2013

Zim started it by stalking and placing hands on him.

Zimmerman is not a cop, no matter how bad he wanted to be one. He had no authority to stop Martin and start the whole sad episode.

 

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)
4. I wouldn't be surprised if that hypocritical douche nozzle goes home after the trial and lights up.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:32 PM
Jul 2013
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
5. Of course thats bullshit.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:38 PM
Jul 2013

It remains to be seen if the jury buys it. Too bad that Trayvon involuntarily gave up a blood sample, yet Zimmerman was never tested. I wonder what the jury would think if Zim had cocaine in his system, or bath salts, syhthetic mj, etc.

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
14. Zimmerman was on various prescription drugs with known, violent side effects
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:54 PM
Jul 2013
Many who have been following the Trayvon Martin case are aware that marijuana was found in Trayvon Martin‘s system on the night that he was killed. It is not common knowledge, however, that the level was well below what medical studies show cause “performance impairment.” The same can not be said for George Zimmerman, the man who shot the teenager. Zimmerman was on various prescription drugs with known, violent side effects while acting as the neighborhood watch captain and on the night Martin died.


MSNBC.com reports that, according to the paramedic incident report, Trayvon Martin's shooter was on the prescription drug Temazepam which is known to cause insomnia and anxiety. Other side effects not mentioned in the MSNBC.com report are “aggressiveness,” “hallucinations,” and other serious symptoms. The U.S. National Library of Medicine cautions that, after taking Temazepam, patients should not be walking around trying to watch anything or anyone and that, if they do not sleep for at least 7-8 hours after taking the drug, they may experience memory loss.


Zimmerman was also on the commonly prescribed drug Adderall, which is known to cause “worsening mental or mood problems (eg, aggression, anxiety, delusions, depression, hallucination, hostility),” according to Drugs.com. Adderall is prescribed for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or narcolepsy. Both Temazepam and Adderall are medications that can cause problematic side effects including agitation and mood swings.



http://www.examiner.com/article/the-prescription-drugs-george-zimmerman-was-taking-when-he-killed-trayvon-martin
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
15. Hopefully the judge allows that into evidence.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:57 PM
Jul 2013

Seems more relevent than mj in Martin's blood. First I'd heard of that detail.

BainsBane

(57,779 posts)
6. That argument depends on jurors never having smoked pot
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:40 PM
Jul 2013

and you know out of 6 people at least a couple have smoked before.

madamesilverspurs

(16,534 posts)
9. If weed led to violence
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:44 PM
Jul 2013

Woodstock would be remembered as a bloodbath.

Instead, it's remembered. Sort of. Party. Mud.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
11. "Morons still pushing this crap!!"
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:45 PM
Jul 2013

You don't have to go back to 'Reefer Madness', you can find it from the current US Justice Department

https://www.ncjrs.gov/ondcppubs/publications/pdf/marijuana_myths_facts.pdf

Not always.Research shows that kids who use marijuana weekly are
nearly four times more likely than non­users to report they engage in
violent behavior. One study found that young people who had used
marijuana in the past year were more likely than non­users to report
aggressive behavior. According to that study, incidences of physically
attacking people, stealing,and destroying property increased in
proportion to the number of days marijuana was smoked in the past
year. Users were also twice as likely as non­users to report they disobey
at school and destroy their own things. In another study, researchers
looking into the relationship between ten illicit drugs and eight criminal
offenses found that a greater frequency of marijuana use was associated
with a greater likelihood to commit weapons offenses; except for alcohol,
none of the other drugs showed such a connection.
That study, published in the Journal of Addictive Diseases in 2001,
also found a link between marijuana use and the commission of
attempted homicide and reckless endangerment offenses.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
16. I don't think the Judge should have let the defense bring that in,
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:04 PM
Jul 2013

and I would have challenged the medical examiner for changing his opinion, right at the point of the prosecution resting their case. It gave the prosecution no opportunity to bring in a different expert witness to challenge the state examiner. You have to call the whole prosecution's efforts suspect to try this case.

And another thing, marijuana has just been legalized in some states. Is it the testimony also, that medical marijuana can cause patients to show aggression? If I was Martin's family and their lawyers, I would be filing a suit right now against the state of Florida. That goes to jury selection and everything about this case so far.

HipChick

(25,615 posts)
17. Zimmerman has a history of violence...why aren't they looking into the policeman he beat up?
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:06 PM
Jul 2013

or the girlfriend he assaulted?

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
22. Zimmerman's prior bads would be prejudicial
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:53 PM
Jul 2013

in this trial. I don't know why his job as a bouncer wasn't brought up, though. Seems that would be relevant.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
34. Screaming Yellow Zonkers
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:35 AM
Jul 2013

Since they stopped making them I just don't see a point to smoking dope anymore.

What are Funyuns?

 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
21. "..The request lines are now open..."
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:42 PM
Jul 2013

Lard-ass....

I never get tired of this gem!

Thanks!

customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
24. This is not about marijuana causing a person to be aggressive
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 09:40 PM
Jul 2013

No matter what O'Mara tells Piers Morgan. It's about creating the picture of TM being a social misfit, who would strike out against an authority figure such as a neighborhood watch person. It plays into the "scary black teenager" profile that O'Mara wants to create in the minds of six women.

It may well be working.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
28. Yes indeed. A try to influence the jury that Martin was a baddy. Dirty politics in court.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:23 PM
Jul 2013

I have 2 hopes now- that Zimmerman is put away and that O'Mara pays the price for his dirty tactics in court.

customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
32. GZ is probably going to skate
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:17 AM
Jul 2013

And his attorney certainly will, no matter what. The only thing at stake for O'Mara is the tens of millions of dollars he can rake in if he gets GZ an acquittal, no matter who guns him down in the street after the trial.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
30. I don't think so. It supports GZ's report to 911 that the guy looked like he was on drugs or
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:34 PM
Jul 2013

something.

Accusations have been made that there was no good reason for GZ to call 911. GZ gave reasons to 911 on tape. One of those reasons was that the guy he saw was walking real slowly, even though it was pouring rain, and it looked like he was on drugs or something, he said. So this might support those reasons.

That's the only reason. It was pot. It doesn't paint TM as a social misfit. Little old ladies are "taking" pot for glaucoma these days, and lots of people with cancer. It's in the process of becoming legal. It's not like we're talking about crack or heroin.

I can understand it being admitted or not. Personally, while I think it does give credence to GZ's reasons for calling 911 to check TM out, I think it goes against GZ in that most people (myself included) think of pot as slowing a person down and making him more passive and mellow. I've never known anyone to get into a fight at the end of a pot high.

customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
31. We'll see what six Florida women feel about that
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:14 AM
Jul 2013

Yes, I'm completely happy that pot is going mainstream, but I have to believe that it will happen last of all in the Old Confederacy.

Your point about TM looking like he was on drugs is interesting, but I think that it's still a negative rather than a neutral when you're down South. Who knows what this case will turn on, the prosecution has done a poor job in my estimation, anybody's speculation as to why they lose is valid.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
44. I don't think of FL as the south. (I'm from the deep south...it's very different from Florida).
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:16 PM
Jul 2013

Yeah, I think the last place pot is legalized will be the south. Sad to say. But I live in TX now, which is not quite the south, so maybe....just maybe....

customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
48. Well, I have been briefly to a few places in Florida
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:57 PM
Jul 2013

and I know that it's not Kentucky or Tennessee, but outside of a few comfortable suburbs filled with migratory old folks, it's not NY or NJ, either.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
33. how do you suppose someone who smoked weed would look or behave to elicit such a conclusion?
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:34 AM
Jul 2013

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
45. You see, this is the problem with some people who are trying to parse evidence.
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:23 PM
Jul 2013

I reported to you what GZ said. Nothing more. We are talking about a toxicology report that shows that GZ's report was correct.

None of my statements involves my opinion at all. It's merely objective support of a statement that was made. You and the jury and anyone else is free to determine, as fact finder, that it cannot be determined when someone is on drugs. But that has nothing to do with the fact that the report supports GZ's statement.

1. GZ says guy looks like he's on drugs or something.
2. Toxicology report shows guy was on drugs.

It's that simple. But like I said, jury may find that GZ wasn't able to determine if TM was on drugs, and then they can disregard the toxicology report.

(But my opinion is this....I smoked a lot of pot in my younger days and was around a lot of people...a lot...who also smoked pot, and did other drugs. I couldn't always tell if someone had been smoking pot, unless I had a conversation with them or got close enough to see their bloodshot eyes. Sometimes I could, though, by body movements or the way they were driving. Pot seemed to really sloooooow people down.)

 

burnodo

(2,017 posts)
39. It looked like he was on drugs
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 06:55 AM
Jul 2013

Horsehockey! And GZ was in no way qualified to make such a determination.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
46. The jury, as fact finder, may decide just that, and disregard the toxicology report. nt
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:24 PM
Jul 2013

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
40. How does someone look high because they're walking slowly?
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 06:56 AM
Jul 2013

I walk with a casual stroll sometimes. Maybe he was tired? Zimmerman does not have the expertise to determine if someone is high based on visual cues. And punishment does not warrent death, assuming Zimmerman had the authority to punish a fellow citizen in the first place.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
47. GZ didn't kill TM because he thought he was on drugs.
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jul 2013

And he didn't "punish" him. That's not even something the jury is allowed to find.

The question boils down to....did GZ shoot TM because he was in fear of his life, and was that the appropriate defense?

The report of him looking like he was on drugs really has nothing to do with the shooting. It's being allowed in as evidence only because it is proof (altho weak proof) that what GZ thought and reported was in fact correct. That he wasn't making it up. That's all. It goes to credibility, I think.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
35. except Martin had no idea whether he was an authority figure
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:43 AM
Jul 2013

Actually, it makes it worse for Zimmerman since he WASN'T an authority figure but acted like one without rules and never told Martin he was the neighborhood watch dude.

Had Zimmerman actually followed his training by staying in his car and not think he was an authority figure when he wasn't by pursuing Martin or even at least told him that he was neighborhood watch when he had the chance none of this would have happened.


customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
41. To Martin
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 07:17 AM
Jul 2013

he was "the man", and was eyeballing the teen as he walked through the neighborhood. The jury's already heard positive testimony from witnesses (including prosecution ones) about GZ's neighborhood watch service.

It's not about what happened that night, it's how O'Mara and his team can spin it for the jury.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
42. why do you think the jurors are dumb as a box of rocks?
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 08:18 AM
Jul 2013

You must if you think that this defense spin trying to portray Zimmerman as behaving correctly in violating the rules he was supposed to follow concerning his neighborhood watching and just discount what he said on his call to dispatch. What happened that night is the whole reason the jurors are there, and you think they're just going to discount everything about what happened that night in favor of defense spin on character?

customerserviceguy

(25,406 posts)
43. I think that O'Mara
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 09:51 PM
Jul 2013

did a good job of lining up witnesses to make GZ look as good as possible. As for the jury being dumb as a box of rocks, that's going to be one of the kindliest things said about them at this forum should they return a total not guilty verdict.

It's Florida, member of the Old Confederacy, in a small town. Small town folks see things way differently from big city people.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BWHAHAHAHA: Marijuana Can...