General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWikileaks is mad! Calls Obama an authoritarian!
Last edited Fri Jul 12, 2013, 11:27 AM - Edit history (1)
WikiLeaks @wikileaks 5h
Obama's mask continues to slip in this affair. Under all the acting, and reading of teleprompters, a vindictive, petty, authoritarian.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks

grrr (ps remember dylan ratigan)

grrrr

grrrr


struggle4progress
(125,309 posts)Mr Greenwald is on record in 2010 laying out a strategy for increasing libertarian turn-out by stripping progressives away from the Dems
Mr Assange obviously doesn't want to go face sexual allegations in Sweden
And Mr Snowden, along predictable rightwing lines, seems to have grown ever more angry at the President since he originally voting third party in 2008
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)
Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)Huh.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)Vindictive, petty, needs teleprompter 'cause he stupid. This is straight Birth of a Nation dogwhistle stuff that the Repubs tried to use against Obama in the beginning but then moved on when it didn't stick. Unfortunately Wikileaks and Greenwald haven't evolved their attacks.
The more they use hat language the less credible they become - there are a lot of negative descriptors one can come up with for Obama (I think the more effective one would be 'detached' and 'unaware', 'cold' to the work the NSA has been doing for instance). But petty and vindictive? Clinton yes, Obama? No way.
handmade34
(23,811 posts)BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)Like how traditional American celeb rivalries play out.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)Because "We open governments" seems a bit broad for their usual M.O.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)We open our arms to the Russian government
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Wow. Really? Teleprompter?
Wikileaks racist is showing.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)Talk about a dog whistle, it can't be more obvious
Generic Other
(29,070 posts)I remember making fun of how Bush used them, completely unable to view a whole sentence without moving his head from left to right and sounding out the big words. It wasn't the teleprompter we found ridiculous in this case, it was the grade school like use of it!!
Obama has never done that; however some seem to think any use of the teleprompter is somehow suspect. That's stupid. People used to refer to notes to give speeches. Lincoln wrote the Gettysburg Address on an envelope. No one would have criticized him for referring to his notes. Even reading off them verbatim. Or using cue cards. No one expects a politician to memorize every word of a speech or deliver an extemporaneous speech every time he opens his mouth. They are not actors. So why criticize teleprompters? It makes no sense. When Obama reads off a teleprompter, he clearly takes in whole sentences and delivers them without the gaffes Bush used to entertain us making. There's a reason we laughingly refer to Bush as the "misunderstimator" or the "edjumacation" president.
Do we expect presidents to give speeches like they were delivering lines in plays? Can't we just accept that these are their official words written after thought and revision and delivered live? Honestly. It is a stupid thing to criticize.
BeyondGeography
(40,791 posts)Waiting...waiting...
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)party. All eyes are off his abuses with Snowden spouting off from Russia
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)UTUSN
(76,686 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)flamingdem
(40,779 posts)about to "leak" that!
ananda
(34,299 posts)
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)than it is to think rationally.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)eh, wikileaks?
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)teleprompter smears? WTF?
Sid
Blackford
(289 posts)Using a teleprompter was never an issue for any president before Obama.
I wonder what has changed?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)and targets peaceful protesters, whistleblowers, and journalists is authoritarian.
When Obama stands up for the First and Fourth Amendments instead of seeking to entrench, legalize, and expand the assaults on them, all the guffawing will make some sense.
Until then, this looks like more propaganda to defend the indefensible.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)flamingdem
(40,779 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)G_j
(40,556 posts)when it was revealed.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)G_j
(40,556 posts)FBI Documents Reveal Secret Nationwide Occupy Monitoring
See the released documents here
http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/fbi-files-ows.html
Homeland Security Tracked Occupy Wall Street 'Peaceful Activist Demonstrations'
Matt SledgeApr 02, 2013
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3002445
How the Government Targeted Occupy
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/05/12120/how-government-targeted-occupy
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)visited the OWS Facebook and Twitter pages?
That was not an issue of national significance.
G_j
(40,556 posts)when you've read the links, or done some research..
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bottom line is that there's no beef to the story. A few memos got drafted, and then it was pointed out that yeah you really shouldn't be monitoring people for engaging in first amendment activity. Snooze.
If this was a real thing, Glenn Greenwald, the CATO institute, and a whole host of others would be breathing fire about it.
There is no evidence that the DHS violated anyone's rights w/r/t the OWS protests.
G_j
(40,556 posts)Homeland Security Documents Show Massive Nationwide Monitoring of Occupy Movement
Documents just obtained by the PCJF from its FOIA request show massive nationwide monitoring, surveillance and information sharing between the Department of Homeland Security and local authorities in response to Occupy. The PCJF, also on behalf of author/filmmaker Michael Moore and the National Lawyers Guild Mass Defense Committee, has made a series of FOIA demands regarding law enforcement involvement in the Occupy Crackdown. ...
This set of released materials reveals intense involvement by the DHS' National Operations Center (NOC) in these activities. The DHS describes the NOC as, "the primary national-level hub for domestic situational awareness, common operational picture, information fusion, information sharing, communications, and coordination pertaining to the prevention of terrorist attacks and domestic incident management. The NOC is the primary conduit for the White House Situation Room and DHS Leadership for domestic situational awareness and facilitates information sharing and operational coordination with other federal, state, local, tribal, non-governmental operation centers and the private sector."
Documents are available in 3 pdfs
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)But, just because some blogger or Kos diarist or random advocacy group say something doesn't mean it's true.
I actually looked at the documents they base their claims on, and whaddya know the claims are exaggerated to high heaven.
People who are prone to believe everything they read on the Internet, of course, accept the characterizations and spin regarding these documents without bothering to read them.
G_j
(40,556 posts)my original statement was that Obama said nothing. I suppose the misleading allegations against the IRS were worth his apologies though.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Also, the IRS inspector general was playing his own game, so there was really no telling what was lurking in the weeds there.
G_j
(40,556 posts)that says it all!!!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)damage control mode rather than defiance mode.
G_j
(40,556 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)He probably could have guessed. But he's not much of a guesser.
Had the IRS IG been candid and upfront, he may have had a better idea what was going on.
Part of not being part of a 'scandal' is not knowing what actually happened.
Response to G_j (Reply #38)
G_j This message was self-deleted by its author.
boilerbabe
(2,214 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I'm also aware of a bunch of unsubstantiated bullcrap claiming that the federal gubmint must have told those PDs to kick the protestors out, because there's no way that Mike Bloomberg would make that decision on his own.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)I thought these guys were supposed to be visionaries and heroes. And they regurgitate the same wheeze the Freepers have been hacking up for the past six years.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)Wonder if they have cable tv at the Ecuadoran Embassy.
Assange may not be up on US right wing dogwhistles
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Those things are addicting.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Deep13
(39,157 posts)railsback
(1,881 posts).. because they're nothing more than Republicans in sheep's clothing.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)How original.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)that just tells you they got nothing - except the outrage.
How very disappointing, I thought Assange was a kind of an intellectual type. Borrowing word salads from Palin... wtf.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)And I don't believe for a second that Wikileaks is not the creation of a foreign government's intelligence agency.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)but if so it's biting Putin in the rear right now.
Or not..
Hard to say.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)Me thinks Snowden's days in Moscow are numbered.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)because Putin shouldn't give asylum after it was rejected.
He'll look like he was played by Assange and Co.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)flamingdem
(40,779 posts)unless of course Greenwald dictated that tweet! Sure sounds like he could have.
They're appealing to adolescents or adults who act like them.
polichick
(37,626 posts)flamingdem
(40,779 posts)Think it over
polichick
(37,626 posts)Guess I should've been more precise.
Calling the president an authoritarian isn't much of a stretch under the circumstances.
(I skip over anything mentioning Palin - she's irrelevant.)
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Don't entertain this garbage.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022981567
Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[1]
First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]

CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Import inspections. Breathalyzer tests. Driver's license requests.
You really think the 4th Amendment has no qualifications?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)ON EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN? What's a little targeting of protesters, whistleblowers, and journalists?
The reflexive, relentless parroting of propaganda rationalizing ANYTHING this administration ever does is high comedy at this point. Or it would be, if this assault on the fundamentals of our Constitutional government was even remotely funny.
Don't entertain this garbage.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022981567
Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[1]
First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]

randome
(34,845 posts)...doesn't stand on its own with an entire 237 years of judiciary decisions and qualifications to 'amend' that amendment.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)THEIR mask is slipping, I think.
Whassa matter? They get in bed with Russia by flying Snowden over there, and now they don't like having to DEAL with that?
Deal with it.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)Last week they whined to Raul Castro that if he weally, twuly supported the South American countries that offered asylum he'd let his airport be used as a transit point.
Like Raul Castro gives a crap about them.
Now whining at Obama! Though that's of course just dog whistles for their gang.
BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)Sucks when things blow up in your face
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)but it's oddly immature to write the way they do.
I can't figure whether they're aiming to the twenty something crowd, still angry with authority, or at baggers and Libertarians who they'd like to recruit!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)flamingdem
(40,779 posts)Generic Other
(29,070 posts)that doesn't mean other criticism is invalidated by this particular argument.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Does that mean that you are in agreement with the other comments?
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)WikiLeaks @wikileaks 37m
If there is one matter that is entirely clear, it is that Edward #Snowden is a dissident. The Whitehouse is going nowhere with this.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)If they did, then Wikileaks is the authoritarian.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)If so that would be on record and being discussed and it's not. Just Evo Morales convocation to complain and a wishy washy resolution that was approved before the EU countries could even weigh in!
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)What does it take for you to admit that something is wrong? Will it take a full declaration of war from the South American Countries? If one holds out from declaring war, does that prove to you there is nothing to it?
Good grief.
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)The EU countries said they never blocked Morales airspace, that's on record from the OAS meeting
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)My how we've changed...
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)The DOJ charges weren't conjured up out of thin air.
A lot of people don't like having to account for their lawbreaking. That doesn't prevent them from going to and being in jail.
Snowden should be exempt...why?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)My reply was in response to the OP, which as far as I can tell is about wikileaks' opinion of Obama.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)flamingdem
(40,779 posts)For example most of those countries have laws that citizens have to have ID at all times.
The US is very relaxed in that regard.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)
flamingdem
(40,779 posts)arf arf Wikileaks