General Discussion

onehandle

(51,122 posts) Mon Jul 15, 2013, 12:54 PM Jul 2013

Do You Think George Zimmerman Should Be Allowed To Own Guns?

Forgetting Florida's fucked up gun laws and SCOTUS's misinterpretation of the Second Amendment.

Remembering what he did, with all of his history in mind, that the jury could not use in consideration.

I'm not asking 'can he be allowed to own guns,' but do you think he should be allowed to.

This is about what you, a DUer, thinks.

9 votes, 0 passes \| Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	3 (33%)
	No
	6 (67%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do You Think George Zimmerman Should Be Allowed To Own Guns? (Original Post) onehandle Jul 2013 OP

I voted no, but the law says yes, premium Jul 2013 #1

That's fine. This isn't about present laws or regulations. It's about what you think. onehandle Jul 2013 #2

I voted yes. unreadierLizard Jul 2013 #3

Fuck if he does!! darkangel218 Jul 2013 #8

of course not Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #4

he needs to be brought up on a discharging a firearms into a person charge. hollysmom Jul 2013 #5

I think we should put guns on trials left is right Jul 2013 #6

Are you even serious with this poll??? darkangel218 Jul 2013 #7

I passed on voting, since this thread serves no purpose. closeupready Jul 2013 #9

Why not? The more the merrier for that assclown! ..nt TeeYiYi Jul 2013 #10

premium

(3,731 posts)

1. I voted no, but the law says yes,

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 12:58 PM

Jul 2013

and he'll also get his CHL back also.
I'm not too worried about GZ, sooner or later, he's going to O.J. himself, hopefully it's not at the expense of someone else's life.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)

2. That's fine. This isn't about present laws or regulations. It's about what you think.

Reply to premium (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:00 PM

Jul 2013

That's why I set them aside in my description.

unreadierLizard

(475 posts)

3. I voted yes.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:01 PM

Jul 2013

Because he was found not guilty by a court of law and a jury of his peers.

I don't like it, but he has the right to own a firearm.

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)

8. Fuck if he does!!

Reply to unreadierLizard (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 02:13 PM

Jul 2013

Not guilty doesn't mean innocent!

Blue_Tires

(57,596 posts)

4. of course not

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:02 PM

Jul 2013

clearly he doesn't have proper judgment on when to use them and is a coward without them...

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)

5. he needs to be brought up on a discharging a firearms into a person charge.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 01:06 PM

Jul 2013

left is right

(1,665 posts)

6. I think we should put guns on trials

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 02:05 PM

Jul 2013

any gun guilty of killing a human being should be ground-up or melted down.

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)

7. Are you even serious with this poll???

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 02:12 PM

Jul 2013

closeupready

(29,503 posts)

9. I passed on voting, since this thread serves no purpose.

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 02:14 PM

Jul 2013

If I were king and he were my subject, I would disallow him gun ownership.

But if I were king, I would order that all child abuse be stopped immediately, that no one go hungry, and everyone with a need for mental health counseling be served adequately.

But I'm not king, and we live in the real world.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)

10. Why not? The more the merrier for that assclown! ..nt

Reply to onehandle (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 02:14 PM

Jul 2013

TYY

Reply to this discussion