In Part Two of CNN's interview tonight Juror B-37 said: "... when George confronted him... "

[Tx4obama]

So, apparently that contradicts what 'some' folks say about Trayvon jumping out of the bushes and sucker punching Zimmerman.

Seems to me that Juror B-37 is making a good case for the Prosecution - but see still seems like a nutty right-winger to me.

[enough]

1. Nice for her, she can say whatever the fuck she wants. It won't change the outcome of the trial. NT

[leftstreet]

2. 'Part 2' ?!! Did this ditz spend as much time deliberating?

aarrgghh

[skeewee08]

3. + 1000

[Lucinda]

4. ...

Her interview makes my head hurt.

[skeewee08]

6. Same here

[Tutonic]

5. She sorta sounds like they took her off her meds while she was sequestered.

Poor thing. NOT.

[Marie Marie]

7. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. I watched a little last night - she talked in circles

and then, it seemed to me, that she admitted that she didn't understand what manslaughter meant or how they were to interpret the charges so she kind of threw her hands in the air and said they just went with not guilty cause they didn't know what else to do. Just my interpretation...

[global1]

8. Did She Know Zimmerman?.....

It sounds like Zim was her friend. She keeps calling him George - like she knew him.

[lumpy]

9. No. but I read that eye witness Mr Good knew Zimmerman when he lived in the complex.

n

[Raine]

10. She's really DUMB, she had the facts all wrong! nt

[davidpdx]

11. After watching the Rachel Jeantel interview with Pierce Morgan

and then going back and looking at some clips of when the other prosecution witnesses testified, I think the jury more or less dismissed all of the accounts given by that side as not creditable. This really bothers me. I've been reluctant to say/think that the jurors had their own preconceived notions about the case, but I'm beginning to think they did.