General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIssues you kinda sorta side with the Communists on
This is not a joke thread - I just thought I'd take in the opposite direction.
If you know me, you know I'm a Communist Sympathizer at the least...
So, for me, the biggest is "From each, according to their ability. To each, according to their need."
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)the CPUSA was on the right side of the race issue as early as the 1930s -- easily a generation before any other organized faction of society. That's why Paul Robeson joined.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)The last one that is
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)white liberal circles to stand against it. Joe Slovo, chairman of the South African CP, was an important member of the ANC.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Being a member of parliament for years, he was a kind of Joe Biden
So he was able to bring together all parties and get them to negotiate
Master arbitrator that man....
sinkingfeeling
(57,835 posts)Marx also detailed the 10 essential tenets of communism, namely:
Central banking system
Government controlled education
Government controlled labor
Government ownership of transportation and communication vehicles
Government ownership of agricultural means and factories
Total abolition of private property
Property rights confiscation
Heavy income tax on everyone
Elimination of rights of inheritance
Regional planning
there's several I agree with. Central banking, government education, heavy income tax, and regional planning. We could get into a more detailed discussion of the need for government ownership of transportation, control of labor, and maybe what's fair in the inheritance department.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Your home, bed, tools, TV, those are personal property
Land, or anything used to make capital is private property
sinkingfeeling
(57,835 posts)The public property is what we're in danger of losing completely in the USA.
Eddie Haskell
(1,628 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Not to drive the profits of the corporate machine.
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)and Abraham Lincoln exchanged correspondence, IIRC.)
Taverner
(55,476 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Disagree: the majority of the recommended solutions.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Capital is an excellent diagnosis of Capitalism
The recommended solutions were all hypothesises at the time
Some were good (distribution of resources, proletariat equality)
Some were bad (Labor Theory Value, central control)
HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 17, 2013, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Most people like that program now.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)In general, some combination of socialism and capitalism is necessary.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)I think most people at DU also generally agree that many big corporations being overly involved in democracy has a negative effect on society.
Small private businesses and a mix of more public control of the "commanding heights" of the economy wouldn't come amiss.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Granted, they would send people to inventory all of their plates and equipment as it was declared state property. And this turned into a protection racket, but yeah.
olddots
(10,237 posts)and less about Capitalism .Each construct has good ideas but seem to chose bad leaders .
Taverner
(55,476 posts)No gods, no masters, no leaders!
forestpath
(3,102 posts)PD Turk
(1,289 posts)....and cigars
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas.
It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness.
"capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks"
"religion is the sign of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, the soul of soulless conditions. it is the opium of the people...The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness"
"necessity is blind until it becomes conscious; freedom is the consciousness of necessity"
"in bourgeois society, capital is independent and has individuality while the living person is dependent and has no individuality"
'the more the division of labor and the application of machinery extend, the more does competition among the workers extend, the more do their wages shrink altogether'
"The human being is in the most literal sense a political animal, not merely a gregarious animal, but an animal which can individuate itself only in the midst of society."
The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them.
Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.
The less you eat, drink and read books; the less you go to the theatre, the dance hall, the public house; the less you think, love, theorize, sing, paint, fence, etc., the more you save - the greater becomes your treasure which neither moths nor dust will devour - your capital. The less you are, the more you have; the less you express your own life, the greater is your alienated life - the greater is the store of your estranged being.
All freed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away (by capitalism), all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses, his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.
Society does not consist of individuals, but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand.
You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.