Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:30 PM Jul 2013

Giving McDonald's eaters calorie guides did not curb bad eating habits

Giving McDonald's eaters calorie guides did not curb bad eating habits

Educating people on the number of calories they should eat may not help them make better choices.

A new study published July 18 in the American Journal of Public Health showed that providing people with calorie guidelines did not help them make better food choices, even when calorie counts for each item were available on the menu.

Several states and cities in the U.S. require that chain restaurants reveal calorie information for their items. Congress has already passed legislation to develop a national calorie labeling system in order to aid health care reform.

However, previous studies have shown that listing calories hasn't exactly helped Americans trim down their waistlines. It hasn't helped that fast food and restaurant food still remain calorie-laden. A 14-year study showed that fast food restaurants have only made minimal improvements to the nutritional value of their items, and 25 percent of Americans eat fast food two or more times a week.

"The general inability of calorie labeling to result in an overall reduction in the number of calories consumed has already been pretty widely shown," study author Julie Downs, an associate research professor of social and decision sciences in the Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Carnegie Mellon University, said to HealthDay. "So that's nothing new. But in the face of that, there has been the growing thought that perhaps the problem is that people don't know how to use the information without some framework, some guidance."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_162-57594536/giving-mcdonalds-eaters-calorie-guides-did-not-curb-bad-eating-habits/

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Giving McDonald's eaters calorie guides did not curb bad eating habits (Original Post) The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP
When you want a Big Mac... Chipper Chat Jul 2013 #1
Don't worry, over time we will make them change the packaging, show a dead fat guy The Straight Story Jul 2013 #2
Posting calorie counts is not forcing everyone to live by someone else's beliefs. W_HAMILTON Jul 2013 #16
I think it's so interesting that so many, even here on DU, are upset when information is provided. Arugula Latte Jul 2013 #18
I don't have a problem with it The Straight Story Jul 2013 #19
stopped there the other day d_r Jul 2013 #6
The truth about McDonalds' success FrodosPet Jul 2013 #37
thats pretty much spot on d_r Jul 2013 #39
I LOVE the orange popsicles! SheilaT Jul 2013 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #12
Same goes for a quarter pounder with cheese. Lugnut Jul 2013 #55
The problem is, none of the food is in a good healthy calorie range! hedgehog Jul 2013 #3
What is a good range? dkf Jul 2013 #5
Google is your friend Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2013 #45
Comparing a 390 calorie fiesta salad vs 550 Big Mac...not such a biggie. dkf Jul 2013 #4
but most who get the big mac will also get the fries and soda JI7 Jul 2013 #51
I get the Big Mac every once in a while. dkf Jul 2013 #52
People who go to fast food places are not looking for healthy choices. ZombieHorde Jul 2013 #7
Yep. Ban smokers from bars because of health concerns...while you are drinking rum at same bar The Straight Story Jul 2013 #8
Yep. By the time you're in the McD's drive thru, I don't think Butterbean Jul 2013 #10
Again, as many here have noted, that's not true for all. I go to McD's about three times a year, Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2013 #46
I've been getting away with eating sweet potato fries fairly often... Silent3 Jul 2013 #50
Big suprise, people go to fast food place for fast food RB TexLa Jul 2013 #9
I would think it may deter some Politicalboi Jul 2013 #11
I don't know, it seems to help me and my family. I might not keep me out of the restaurant Ed Suspicious Jul 2013 #13
Oh please. Life is too short to deny yourself a big mac. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #14
Whether it deters me or not, it's information I like to have. nt AllINeedIsCoffee Jul 2013 #15
Your quote ends with a typical attitude. Igel Jul 2013 #17
I think it's pretty clear that a lot of people don't know what to do with the information. Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2013 #31
Which is so much worse than being smug about your unhealthy food choices, 6000eliot Jul 2013 #40
Close to TWO generations have forgotten what "going out to eat" meant/means SoCalDem Jul 2013 #20
Chips and sodas "occasionally"? Not from the mid-50's on! We had a Charles' Chips TRUCK deliver! WinkyDink Jul 2013 #22
You were a lucky ducky SoCalDem Jul 2013 #25
Don't forget the Schwan's Ice Cream truck! NickB79 Jul 2013 #27
We only ate out once a week as kids NickB79 Jul 2013 #28
In a small Kansas... onyourleft Jul 2013 #43
Do expensive restaurants with marbled steaks and foie gras give calorie counts? If so, WinkyDink Jul 2013 #21
+1 leftstreet Jul 2013 #30
They don't even put the prices on the menu, let alone nutritional information 1-Old-Man Jul 2013 #42
No, but we're talking about a problem affecting a tiny proportion of the people who eat at MickeyD's Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2013 #44
It's curbed mine. n/t Iris Jul 2013 #23
I suppose it's good info to have. HappyMe Jul 2013 #24
A lot of eating habits are hard to break due to income and free time constraints. killbotfactory Jul 2013 #26
If youre regularly or even semi regulrly eating at Mcdonalds exlrrp Jul 2013 #29
not true at all Iris Jul 2013 #36
Personally don't eat at McDonald's I don't care for how their food tastes Arcanetrance Jul 2013 #32
Kind of misses the point. DirkGently Jul 2013 #33
As noted above: The Straight Story Jul 2013 #34
A calorie guide by itself is not a guide to healthy eating. kwassa Jul 2013 #35
I think it is good to have the nutritional/calorie labels eilen Jul 2013 #38
For me, it certainly made drinking shakes are far less frequent occurrence Silent3 Jul 2013 #41
Congrats on the weight loss! It can be very hard for people with that much weight to lost to make a Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2013 #47
Thanks. While it certainly wasn't easy... Silent3 Jul 2013 #49
This proves people are idiots. Apophis Jul 2013 #48
reality lindisfarne Jul 2013 #53
Unhealthy lifestyles... onpatrol98 Jul 2013 #56
Giving McDonald's employees a budget does not make them able to *buy food*, either Hekate Jul 2013 #57
Fast food industry fought tooth & nail to keep off the calorie Raine Jul 2013 #58

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
2. Don't worry, over time we will make them change the packaging, show a dead fat guy
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:36 PM
Jul 2013

on the box with his stomach cut open or something like that.

There is no shortage of control freaks who won't be happy until everyone lives by their beliefs/religion. And I, for one, will no longer stand in their way but will assist them because I have learned that we are safer and healthier if we let other people remove our choices....

W_HAMILTON

(10,333 posts)
16. Posting calorie counts is not forcing everyone to live by someone else's beliefs.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:45 PM
Jul 2013

I appreciate having the calories posted on the McDonald's drive-thru menu and I have altered my purchases based on them. No, I don't go for apple slices over fries, but I have chosen burgers and wraps that have lower calories over similar ones with higher calories. Having calories posted can't be much of a big deal to a corporation the size of McDonald's.

On another note, Dairy Queen would probably go out of business if it posted their calories! Recently, I went there and bought a large S'mores Blizzard. I figured it was bad (maybe like 600 calories?), but when I got home and checked out the calorie count, it had over 1,400 calories! I had no idea. If calorie counts had been posted, I most certainly would have opted for something less ... obscene, lol.

I don't think the posting of calorie counts will make me eat an undressed salad and apple slices at McDonald's, but it does help me select items that have fewer calories among a group of items that I may be interested in.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
18. I think it's so interesting that so many, even here on DU, are upset when information is provided.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 03:19 PM
Jul 2013

In this thread in response #53 a DUer labeled people "food fascists" just for giving information. Isn't that the opposite of fascism? Nobody is forcing anyone to eat anything or not eat anything, so how is that limiting freedom?

There are a lot of thin skins around here when it comes to someone just giving data on nutritional values. I find that bizarre.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023150089#post53

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
19. I don't have a problem with it
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 03:22 PM
Jul 2013

My problem is that since it is not getting the desired effect or curtailing choices in an open and fair way there will be new tactics and they will ratchet them up until they get what they desire (ie, that you conform and make the same choices).

Posting calories is pretty common sense and allows people to make informed decisions.

d_r

(6,908 posts)
6. stopped there the other day
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:50 PM
Jul 2013

on the way back from camping. I noticed that the big mac and fries both had nutrition information all over the package. They were covered with it. I doubt anyone pays much attention at that point though.

d_r

(6,908 posts)
39. thats pretty much spot on
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:32 AM
Jul 2013

I realized that after a week of summer camp is pretty much the only time that salt and fat is a good thing.

What the guy said about orange popcycles is the story of the kids at my house.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
54. I LOVE the orange popsicles!
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:52 AM
Jul 2013

You two can just send me your orange popsicles. I'll eat them.

Response to Chipper Chat (Reply #1)

Lugnut

(9,791 posts)
55. Same goes for a quarter pounder with cheese.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:01 AM
Jul 2013

Sometimes you just need to have one and damn the calories.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
3. The problem is, none of the food is in a good healthy calorie range!
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:39 PM
Jul 2013

Once you cross the threshold of any fast food chain, health goes out the window!

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
4. Comparing a 390 calorie fiesta salad vs 550 Big Mac...not such a biggie.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:49 PM
Jul 2013

Look at those frappes and shakes though. Now that is appalling.

http://nutrition.mcdonalds.com/getnutrition/nutritionfacts.pdf

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
52. I get the Big Mac every once in a while.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:16 AM
Jul 2013

We share the fries 5 ways and drink water. I'm too cheap to buy a drink.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
7. People who go to fast food places are not looking for healthy choices.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:52 PM
Jul 2013

Just like people who go to bars are not looking for healthy choices.

However, telling other people how to live is oh so fun!!!

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
8. Yep. Ban smokers from bars because of health concerns...while you are drinking rum at same bar
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 01:54 PM
Jul 2013

Butterbean

(1,014 posts)
10. Yep. By the time you're in the McD's drive thru, I don't think
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:01 PM
Jul 2013

stellar nutrition and healthy eating are at the top of your list. All you're really thinking is that you have a huge hankering for fries, calories be damned.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
46. Again, as many here have noted, that's not true for all. I go to McD's about three times a year,
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:05 PM
Jul 2013

and it's always for the sake of convenience. I must admit to liking those McNuggets, but I hate their fries. I never order fries anywhere, though, because I don't like them enough to justify the calories and bad fat. If I'm eating unhealthy crap, I have to really love the taste. And I want to know how many calories I'm taking in for the sake of an indulgence.

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
50. I've been getting away with eating sweet potato fries fairly often...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:03 AM
Jul 2013

...two to three times per week. It's probably only once every 3-4 weeks I eat regular fries.

It's not like sweet potato fries are that much healthier, but they at least carry a few more nutrients along with the fat and calories, and the servings are typically smaller than I see for regular fries, around 350 calories or so.

I eat a lot of things that I'm sure many of today's food puritans would frown upon, but it's working well for me, and my diet is certainly way better than before. I got a check up after I'd lost the first 50 lbs and my cholesterol was all the way down to 133. I had good blood work numbers all the way around.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
11. I would think it may deter some
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:02 PM
Jul 2013

But mostly in real restaurants, not McDonald's. I'm not fat, and I can eat anything, but when I see the prices, that makes me think twice about what I am going to order over calories.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
13. I don't know, it seems to help me and my family. I might not keep me out of the restaurant
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:13 PM
Jul 2013

but once I'm there it helps me choose between equally "tasty" choices. If I know I have 650 calories budgeted for my meal, it helps me decide what's in that range. I don't see how removing info from the packaging helps me make choices. The info visible on the package and menu boards is helping me to make informed choices.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
14. Oh please. Life is too short to deny yourself a big mac.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:13 PM
Jul 2013

Or some other tasty treat. To each their own.

Let people live their lives the way they chose. Inform them on what's healthy and what's not , and leave it to that.

I personally find those Don't eat that! Don't drink that! types extreamly annoying. To each their fucking own x

Igel

(37,535 posts)
17. Your quote ends with a typical attitude.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:47 PM
Jul 2013

"If they have the information and don't agree with me, it must be because they don't know what to do with the information."

Inferred: "Because I'm superior and know better, and those like me must conduct an intervention to save them from their own benighted selves." Okay, that's cynical, and in more than a few cases I have no doubt people don't know how to contextualize it ... and would care.

I have the context. When I get 3 or 4 refills of a tanker-sized softdrink, I'm fully aware of the calorie count, impact on insulin levels, amount of caffeine and stress on the old adrenals. I know that I'm consuming empty calories and my ghrelin level is already saying, "You're not hungry, dork." I don't care. Some days I worry about my organically grown (by me) vegetables and fresh salad, the portion size of meat, consumption of my nice homemade probiotic filmyolk or water kefir or live-culture yoghurt, monitor the amount of salt I put in my food and balance it with sufficient KCl ...

Then there are days like today, when I'm planning a serious Dunkin Donuts run in between pop-up thunderstorms.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
31. I think it's pretty clear that a lot of people don't know what to do with the information.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:28 PM
Jul 2013

Huge numbers of McDonalds' customers eat that crap frequently with no balancing it with any fresh salads (OK, maybe a hunk of iceberg with 1000 calories worth of blue cheese dressing on it), nutritious veggies (organic or otherwise), or much of anything that's not just very, very unhealthful.

If they're actually looking at the fact that their one "meal" is more than that number of calories they should have in a few days (do the "nutrition" facts come with anything to indicate that fact? Or the hypoglycemic index, or anything else that would help people put those numbers in to context? ) and they're not cutting back on that shit, then they don't know what to do with the information.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
20. Close to TWO generations have forgotten what "going out to eat" meant/means
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jul 2013

People USED to cook and eat at home...MOST of the time.

They would eat at a restaurant for a special occasion, when they were remodeling their kitchens, or when they traveled.

No one CARED about the calories of food they ate at a restaurant, because they did it so rarely. This how people were introduced to different foods from the meals we all ate regularly at home.

People also did not sit around with snacks at the ready, or walk around with a tub-o-soda.

Things like cookies, cakes, pies, chips, soft drinks were relegated to the occasionally (like at picnics) eaten foods. NOW those things are a daily drive-thru staple for too many people.

I was trying to remember when our own kids first ate fast food..Until 1981 we never lived anywhere that had any.. The month before we left Kansas, we got a Dairy Queen, but had no other "branded" fast foods. There were a few hamburger-stand type places, but everything else was a family owned restaurant.

As long as we controlled their transportation, they did not have any fast foods unless we were on the road...And even then we prefer to stop---get out and go to a nice restaurant.

They were all teenagers before they had any access to fast foods.

Many kids today are eating happy meals as soon as they get teeth these days

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
22. Chips and sodas "occasionally"? Not from the mid-50's on! We had a Charles' Chips TRUCK deliver!
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:28 PM
Jul 2013

NickB79

(20,357 posts)
27. Don't forget the Schwan's Ice Cream truck!
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:49 PM
Jul 2013

They'd even come out to the bumfuck nowhere farm we lived on in central Minnesota when I was a kid in the 80's.

NickB79

(20,357 posts)
28. We only ate out once a week as kids
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:51 PM
Jul 2013

We'd only go into town from the farm for shopping once a week on the weekends. We'd get fast food then.

On our birthdays, we got to go out to Dairy Queen and/or McDonald's, and then see a movie.

Once a month, we'd go to Pizza Hut for a nice family dinner.

It was actually really nice.

onyourleft

(726 posts)
43. In a small Kansas...
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:31 AM
Jul 2013

...town where I lived until the age of ten, we had a Dairy Queen right across the street from the movie theater. So, that would have been before 1954.

I ate fast food at K.U. when cheap hamburgers and a cup of coco were staples on Sunday night due to no dinner service in the dorms. I'm sure I had some fast food growing up in Kansas City; however, meals were most always home cooked (and no whining about what was served). I really cannot remember "going out to eat" except for the occasional picnic.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
21. Do expensive restaurants with marbled steaks and foie gras give calorie counts? If so,
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:25 PM
Jul 2013

what has been the effect?

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
44. No, but we're talking about a problem affecting a tiny proportion of the people who eat at MickeyD's
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jul 2013

regularly.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
24. I suppose it's good info to have.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:43 PM
Jul 2013

If I have a hankering for a Quarter pounder and fries, it's not going to stop me. I don't eat there often, and don't need to worry over calories.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
26. A lot of eating habits are hard to break due to income and free time constraints.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:47 PM
Jul 2013

Cheap convenient foods tend to be the worst for us, nutritionally.

There is also the fact that they tend to be more immediately satisfying.

That and there are subsidized, calorie-laden, nutrition-less sweeteners in everything.

exlrrp

(623 posts)
29. If youre regularly or even semi regulrly eating at Mcdonalds
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:11 PM
Jul 2013

you don't care about calorie counts very much.

Iris

(16,872 posts)
36. not true at all
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:10 PM
Jul 2013

In recent years I've found myself in my car much more than I'd like to be and have had to resort to the drive through at McDonald's at least once a week. I care a lot about calories and find the calorie counts help out a lot.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
32. Personally don't eat at McDonald's I don't care for how their food tastes
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 10:55 PM
Jul 2013

That said on occasion I do break down and have something completely greasy and unhealthy. A double cheeseburger with pork roll on it. That being said I'm all for letting people eat what they want but teaching moderation and relegating things like McDonald's and the like back to an occasional treat.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
33. Kind of misses the point.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:02 PM
Jul 2013

People have a right to know what's being sold to them as "food." Many restaurant and fast food dishes contain astonishing amounts of fat, sugar, salt & calories for no good reason.

The information is the point, not trying to make people behave in one way or another.

It will also introduce a species of competition heretofore unknown in the food business. If one outfit's turkey sandwich has two or three or 12 times the amount of calories or fat or whatnot, it will at least be embarrassing to the establishment and allow the possibility for people to choose something else if they wish.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
34. As noted above:
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:06 PM
Jul 2013

I am a-ok with them providing the info and think it is a good idea to help people make informed decisions. We have done so in the past with other things as well.

It is when those things fail to get people to change their habits that the BS starts.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
35. A calorie guide by itself is not a guide to healthy eating.
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:09 PM
Jul 2013

Many people have no idea how many calories they should be eating each day. And no idea of what kind of calories.

I live in one of those places that requires the calorie count, and I find it fairly shocking. Salads with 1200 calories?

eilen

(4,955 posts)
38. I think it is good to have the nutritional/calorie labels
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:30 AM
Jul 2013

It does help to have that information. However, I suspect that once you decide to walk into a McDonalds, you have already pretty much given up for that day. I rarely go to one and when I do I usually choose a grilled wrap or just a plain jane cheeseburger, and practice some willpower and not order fries with that. I never order soda, unsweetened iced tea. This happens when I experience unexpected longer shifts of work that occur without meal break on my way home and when I travel.

I do not even consider calorie counts when we go out to eat at a local restaurant during the week. We go maybe 2-3 times a month and include cocktails. Most of our meals are home made and our diets are generally pretty healthy.

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
41. For me, it certainly made drinking shakes are far less frequent occurrence
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 08:37 AM
Jul 2013

Then again, as soon as I decided to lose weight and get in shape last April (I've lost 85 lbs.) I've only been to McDonald's rarely. For a while I still grabbed breakfast at McDonald's once a week (Egg McMuffin, Hash Browns, OJ -- comes to around 650 calories as I recall), but I stopped doing that after a while and have only eaten at McDonald's a handful of times in the past year.

Even though I've developed a pretty good sense of caloric values, shakes were one thing that threw me for a loop. I'd been guessing they had about half the calories they really have.

My new fast food is typically Chipotle or Panera. I had been eating at Burger King maybe once per week last summer over a span of time when they had sweet potato fries and I could get a Whopper with cheese (no mayo, no pickles) on a whole grain bun. I know that changing the bun and choosing sweet potato fries over regular fries was hardly that big a change in nutritional value anyway, and as a once-per-week thing it mattered even less in the big picture, but once I couldn't make that little nod toward improving the quality of my meal, I've hardly gone back to Burger King since.

I've been doing so much exercise lately (I burned 1500 calories yesterday, 900-1400/day is typical 6 days per week) that I could easily eat fast food more often, including drinking a few of those shakes, but I try to fill my calorie deficit with healthier choices most of the time, or, if I'm really going to treat myself, tastier indulgences than McDonald's (like last night's trip to Cheesecake Factory).

At any rate, I'm not too surprised at the results. I'm happy to have the extra info, but those of us who want that info are probably less likely to frequent McDonald's, or similar places, in the first place.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,484 posts)
47. Congrats on the weight loss! It can be very hard for people with that much weight to lost to make a
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:08 PM
Jul 2013

change. I'll bet you're feeling much better in many ways.

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
49. Thanks. While it certainly wasn't easy...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:42 AM
Jul 2013

...it hasn't been what I'd call brutal, it's taken a moderate amount of determination and discipline, nothing heroic.

While I still wouldn't say I love the exercise I do now, I've figured out a routine that's a lot more tolerable and easier to stick with than what I did the first time I lost a lot of weight, back in the nineties. Considering that even back then, hating what I was doing, I stayed fit and trim for over eight years, I feel good about my prospects of sticking with what I'd doing now even longer, since it suits me a lot better.

It's pretty much the same story with food. In the nineties, somehow I managed to stick with a low-fat diet for nearly eight years even though I was quite frequently hungry. Now that I'm doing something (very, VERY loosely) like South Beach or paleo, my food choices are a lot easier to stick with too. I've actually gotten to the point that I have to make a conscious effort to eat enough food since now I'm working out hard enough that I need 3000 calories or more a day so that I don't keep losing weight, and can start building up more muscle.

 

Apophis

(1,407 posts)
48. This proves people are idiots.
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:14 PM
Jul 2013

People don't want to be educated on the bad choices they make. They're content with their fat asses and weeble-wobble bodies.

lindisfarne

(4,392 posts)
53. reality
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:22 AM
Jul 2013

I'll bet it had some impact on some people, but most people who would care were mostly likely already aware, and not eating much at McD's (keep in mind, the appetizers and entrees in many restaurants are just as bad as the food at McD's).

I'm guessing that the average person who goes to McD's regularly and orders the high calorie, high fat items really does not understand issues of nutrition. Simply giving them a chart isn't going to change their behavior. They also may be more likely to have genetic factors which cause high fat/high salt food to be more reinforcing.

I don't see how an occasional hamburger & small french fries is really all that much worse at McDonalds compared to at any other restaurant.

I'm also guessing that the average person who regularly eats at McD's has a lower average income, compared to those who don't. If you're hungry & not near your house, you can get food off of McD's dollar menu (which in many areas is shrinking or >$1) for a reasonable price.

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
56. Unhealthy lifestyles...
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:49 AM
Jul 2013

I think weight gain and other health issues are the result of a combination of factors...not just unhealthy food. But, unhealthy food, stress, lack of exercise, depression, etc.

So, although changing one dynamic makes a difference with a certain segment of the population, it's just a much larger problem than sticking the dietary information on the packaging or next to the food item at the drive through.

Although, I personally like the information, and it has curbed our visits. But, then again, we weren't frequent visitors, in the first place.

I feel similarly about cafeteria food. I feel kids need healthy alternatives and food that tastes good. But, I don't believe the key to fighting childhood obesity is to be found in changing the cafeteria food. I think the problem is multifaceted and complicated. For instance, their home environments, lack of extracurricular opportunities, latchkey children who can't participate in activities, and a limited availability of activities that appeal to more kids, stress, etc.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
57. Giving McDonald's employees a budget does not make them able to *buy food*, either
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:02 AM
Jul 2013

The Golden Arches, sadly, is bad news all around.

Raine

(31,179 posts)
58. Fast food industry fought tooth & nail to keep off the calorie
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 03:36 AM
Jul 2013

count and nutritional guides, they obviously don't know their customer base at all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Giving McDonald's eaters ...