General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid Helen Thomas ever apologize for her anti-Semitic speech?
Last edited Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:36 AM - Edit history (1)
If not, why not?
During the speech, Thomas said: "Congress, the White House, Hollywood and Wall Street are owned by Zionists. No question, in my opinion." Thomas defended her comments on December 7, telling Scott Spears of Marion, Ohio AM radio station WMRN, "I just think that people should be enlightened as to who is in charge of the opinion in this country."
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Helen_Thomas&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop
ON EDIT: 160+ responses, not one of which contains any kind of link to an apology for this speech. So it looks like the answer is "no".
PDJane
(10,103 posts)But don't think she should have been.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)PDJane
(10,103 posts)Whether it's true or not, the US certainly spends a great deal on Arming the "Only Democracy in The Middle East." I don't actually think that you can have a religious democracy, but that's another tale.
There are a lot of people who hold unpopular viewpoints, and I should know, but I will say that the uproar about her 'anti-semitic' statements give some support to the assertion.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Lots of Jewish people are anti-Zionists. Noam Chomsky is another good example. The ADL characterizes everything that is anti-Jewish state policy as anti-Semitic. That doesn't make it so.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)OK.
Cha
(319,067 posts)whatever.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)It's obvious hyperbole not intended to be taken literally. One would have to be pretty naive to assume that political Zionism doesn't exist in Washington.
Warpy
(114,614 posts)That's why so many people found it offensive.
Again, being anti Zionist is not the same as being an antisemite.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)America *is* utterly controlled by zionists - I defy you to point me to one anti-zionist in a position of power or influence (this is the major reason Palestine is still occupied). The president is a zionist; the cabinet are exclusively zionists, the senate and the congress are virtually exclusively zionists. The appointment of moderate zionists like Grassley and Power is hailed as a scandal because they're not pro-Israel enough; no genuine anti-zionist would ever get anywhere senior. I'm sure it's nearly as bad on Wall St; Hollywood may be slightly better but probably not much.
"Zionists" is often used as a codeword for "Jews". America is clearly not controlled by Jews, and nor are Hollywood or Wall St.
Whether or not Thomas was using it as a codeword, I don't know.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)jessie04
(1,528 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)demmiblue
(39,719 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)You don't have to get nasty. By the way I didn't agree with Ms Thomas but she is entitled to her beliefs. I will miss her alot because she held their feet to the fire. No question was a bad question. She spoke truth to power.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I checked there is freedom of the press and speech.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)is protected by the First Amendment.
PDJane
(10,103 posts)Which has been taken to mean anti-jewish.
malaise
(296,085 posts)uppityperson
(116,020 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I don't fault her for that. I can understand it but I don't agree with her.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)It is a misdirection, and it is fallacious ....
STOP trying to hoodwink your fellow DUers with misrepresentations of the terms ...
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,996 posts)sgtbenobo
(327 posts)You are priceless.
Carry on!
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I like Ms Thomas very much.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)("We owe respect to the living; to the dead we owe only the truth."
demmiblue
(39,719 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)demmiblue
(39,719 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)uppityperson
(116,020 posts)Big difference between being able to remember what someone posts and profiling, stalking, killing a teenager.
demmiblue
(39,719 posts)A strange leap, indeed!
Demmiblue: DU's Zimmerman!
Strangely enough, I was called to jury one of his posts soon after his comment to me (the jury decided to hide his post).
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)Spazito
(55,487 posts)Response to Spazito (Reply #146)
seaglass This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spazito
(55,487 posts)uppityperson
(116,020 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Although now certain quarters will be sad to miss their friend. Great PPR.
demmiblue
(39,719 posts)Shoot, I don't plan on using my golden uterus... I wish I could sell it and go on an around-the-world adventure (I hear the price of gold is pretty good right now).
cprompt
(192 posts)The op could've found the answer on Google instead of post a flame bait thread the day of the death
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)... what some here are trying to say is that the OP has an agenda. It's an agenda that sticks out all over him. It's an agenda that don't need no stinkin' google, senor. Nobody needs to "stalk" the OP to ultimately just see it for what it is.
And at this moment in time, on the day of the death of a truly great woman, he wants to smear her with anti-Semitism (a religious and cultural hatred that has caused the deaths of millions) when what she apparently may have been was anti-Zionist (a political position regarding the State of Israel and its behavior in the world). Furthermore, she was a frail 90 when she expressed this opinion, so she certainly wasn't cheering on any pogroms.
Hekate
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)the poster is entitled to post what they want. His post didn't effect me. I still think she was a great reporter. All am saying is people don't have to get so nasty when posting something we don't like. We all know she was a great reporter.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Bonhomme Richard
(9,545 posts)quite a few to drop their cloaks.
Why go after a woman over a comment when she spent her life trying to enlighten the rest of us. That is, of course, if you are not looking at it as an angle.
Raine
(31,177 posts)Bonhomme Richard
(9,545 posts)She was a good person.
So let them throw the shit. That is irrelevant.
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)to an anonymous fan. We corresponded several times over the years. She will be missed.
BlueMTexpat
(15,690 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)If there is a thread on race and racism, you can bet to find him shitting in it.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)old age and strokes have a tendency to allow the dreck that resides in the bottom of our collective unconscious to surface.
FarPoint
(14,764 posts)The medical clinical issues of Helen Thomas were identified back when the remarks were expressed ...and then the controversy was over.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But you would think that at some point she would have a lucid moment where she would have realized what she had said, and apologize.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)IIRC she said "I can't be anti-Semitic, I'm a Semite!" (Which is the same sort of nonsensical parsing of language that's a favourite parlour game of those who try to redefine "anti-Semitic" to mean something other than "anti-Jewish".)
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Depends upon how narrowly you define Semitic.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)The word "anti-Semitic" was coined by a German called Wilhelm Marr in the latter half of the 19th century, to specifically mean what we would otherwise call "Jew-hatred" (auf Deutsch: Jüdenhaß). Every accepted definition of the term defines it specifically as "hostility toward and prejudice against Jews as an ethnic, religious, or racial group".
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I sincerely doubt that Helen Thomas was an anti-Semite, and her statement does not make her one.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Find a dictionary that says otherwise.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Apparently that sort of word play is lost on humorless pedants. It is possible to have a sharp tongue without being hateful.
But, that sort of nuance may not be well understood by those who live in a compartmentalized world of absolutes. Get my meaning?
Good night.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)It's a tactic that has its origins in Arab anti-Semitism post-1948; "but how can we be anti-Semitic? We're Semites!"
There's nothing "nuanced" about it. (and for what it's worth? Anyone who equates the actions of the state of Israel with "the Jews" or "Zionists" as a collective group? Is an anti-Semite. And that includes Helen Thomas.)
pennylane100
(3,425 posts)Semitic - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster ...
Definition of SEMITIC. 1: of, relating to, or constituting a subfamily of the Afro-Asiatic language family that includes Hebrew, Aramaic, Arabic, and Amharic
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semitic
Semitic people - definition of Semitic people by the Free ...
Se·mit·ic (s-m t k) adj. 1. Of or relating to the Semites or their languages or cultures. 2. Of, relating to, or constituting a subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic language group that includes Arabic, Hebrew, Amharic, and Aramaic.
thefreedictionary.com/Semitic+people
More from thefreedictionary.com
Semitic people - Definition | WordIQ.com - Dictionary ...
Semitic is an adjective which in common parlance " MISTAKENLY" refers specifically to Jewish things, while the term actually refers to things originating among speakers of Semitic languages or people descended from them, and in a linguistic context to the northeastern subfamily of Afro-Asiatic.
wordiq.com/definition/Semitic_people
More from wordiq.com
What is meant by semitic , and who are the semitic people , can you list them...
Semites are peoples who speak Semitic languages; the group includes Jews Arabs Aramaeans and some Ethiopians. In a Biblical sense...
in.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110508072104AAwiw4x
More from in.answers.yahoo.com
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think that's where the confusion comes in sometimes.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)Here, I'll save you the trouble of looking up "anti-Semitism":
n.
One who discriminates against or who is hostile toward or prejudiced against Jews.
anti-Se·mitic (-s-mtk) adj.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/anti-Semitic
noun \ˌan-tē-ˈse-mə-ˌti-zəm, ˌan-ˌtī-\
Definition of ANTI-SEMITISM
: hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anti-semitism
noun
[mass noun]
hostility to or prejudice against Jews.
Derivatives
anti-Semite
noun
anti-Semitic
adjective
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/anti--Semitism
Linguistically and ethnographically, many people besides Jews may be described as "Semitic peoples", but "anti-Semitism" only ever refers to Jews. Full stop.
hlthe2b
(113,954 posts)But, if you are going to rehash this at this late juncture and on this day, all I can say is that is incredibly unfortunate, insensitive, and unseemly. It was fully argued to the nth degree on DU2 at the time it occurred. I'm sure a search will bring up tons of those old contentious threads.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)That's when she said Jews should get the hell out of Palestine.
Later on is when she said the Jews controlled Congress, Hollywood, and Wall Street.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)That was an apology for when she said that "the Jews should get the hell out of Palestine".
But thanks anyway for trying.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)And I won't be apologizing for single vowel. Helen Thomas was entitled to her free speech whether you, or others, are offended.
I'm willing to bet she led a far more interesting and impact full life than you or I.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,545 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Have difficulty accepting no, and cry when you don't get your way about things. Other than that I'm sure you're at least half as nice a person as Helen.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Have a great day.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)See how that works?
Dreamer Tatum
(10,996 posts)I am entitled to spew hatred at Jews."
Wow.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)... and its uncritical US supporters in DC.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)RIP HELEN.
Cha
(319,067 posts)great things in her life.
Violet_Crumble
(36,385 posts)Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)I'm not sure the OP makes sense
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)produce the desired outrage.
byeya
(2,842 posts)takeover and ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Zionists conflate anti-zionism and anti-Jewish sentiment to further the takeover.
Thomas had nothing to apologize for. Neither does Jimmy Carter.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)are end-of-days fundamentalist Christians.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)... but believe all the Jews will fry for eternity in Hell. The ultra-Orthodox and the fundies both want the "Biblical borders of Israel restored" -- something the State of Israel emphatically does NOT, because attempting to do so in this day and age would cause WW III to break out in the Middle East immediately. The Ultra-Orthodox just want the Messiah to show up, and the secular State of Israel has no validity in their minds until He does. The ultra-fundamentalist Christians just want the Messiah to come again, and boy do they have some interesting fantasies about that. Those are the religious Zionists.
Meanwhile in Washington DC and elsewhere, it makes good politics for the GOP to manipulate both groups for their own ends. Bush Jr. certainly yanked their chains a lot. Those are the political Zionists. The Dems have always supported Israel, so for them it's a habit and a calculation rather different than the GOP version.
byeya
(2,842 posts)the god-fearing up to eternally climate controlled heaven.
typeviic
(61 posts)AIPAC gives those creatures in Congress their marching orders.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)The fact is you want to stir controversy and make it about you on the day a journalist who was universally lionized for her life's work passed away.
You are a sad, sad little person.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)kas125
(2,483 posts)exactly. What a horrible, sad, little person. Ugh.
Spazito
(55,487 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Sure are...
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)noticed even in the most liberal of circles. It is is even permitted here on one of the most left-wing discussion forums on the Internet - In a media culture where an unabashedly and completely unapologetic racist and bigot like Bob Schieffer is considered such a distinguished expert on foreign policy that he is chosen as the sole moderator for the only national debate on foreign policy during the Presidential race. In a media culture where "experts" with opinions every bit as extreme as the anti-Semitic ravings of David Duke are treated as intellectual commentators. In such a culture for an elderly American-Arab women on two or three occasions in their entire life to let off some inappropriate remarks after a lifetime of being one of the greatest journalist in all of American history - is a rather small thing to fault.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...so much so that her PERSONAL opinion on one topic means nothing in the larger fabric that was her life.
You should be ashamed of yourself for this OP.
Drew Richards
(1,558 posts)Does that make my entire lifes work worthless because my opinion differs from yours?
You know what is just as bad as a Fascist? A Militant Zionist....they are one in the same in my eyes.
The flags should be at half staff for her contributions to this country and journalism. More then any freekin actor or entertainer...
This OP is nothing but hate speech clocked as a "question" pathetic.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Drew Richards
(1,558 posts)Spewing the hate after all it is still your right to speak your mind even if my opinion is that you, as a person, from your works, don't hold a candle to the honorable Helen Thomas.
ZRT2209
(1,357 posts)I'm with President Carter on this one
jessie04
(1,528 posts)And you "agree with her".
Like when she said jews should get out of Israel and go somewhere else.
That's some serious hatred youre carrying around.
Logical
(22,457 posts)b.durruti
(102 posts)Violet_Crumble
(36,385 posts)So I wouldnt hold my breath waiting for an answer
Logical
(22,457 posts)Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Would it not be more technically correct to offer that Helen made a comment that was a bit too extreme rather than Helen gave an "anti-Semitic" speech?
In a mildly amusing way, you are somewhat guilty of the same sin as Helen only to a slightly less degree.
Cheers!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Fine. Whatever.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)would probably deeply resent your appropriation of his name as you have done here on DU.
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/aneurin_bevan.html
- Aneurin Bevan
It is not possible to create peace in the Middle East by jeopardizing the peace of the world.
- Aneurin Bevan
Eddie Haskell
(1,628 posts)Why was she forced to apologize for the truth?
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)The second quote seems to clarify the first quote. Do you think she is saying that the opinions of Congress, etc. are owned by those who support the rhetorical construct of Israel?
Is this a hyperbolic way of saying Zionism is a popular belief in Congress, the White House, Hollywood, and Wall Street?
Eddie Haskell
(1,628 posts)Congress gave the military authority to detain any one of us indefinitely, without a trial, based solely on the accusation that we have done what the U.S. does every day in Syria -- support a group associated with al-Qaida?
I find the hypocrisy mind-blowing.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)What the heck are you talking about?
Eddie Haskell
(1,628 posts)http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/25/iran-commander-syria-conflict-end-israel-falls/
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/20/19060599-syria-spillover-violence-threatens-cease-fire-with-israel?lite
http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/UNs-Ban-warns-of-renewed-Syria-Israel-conflict-316353
oberliner
(58,724 posts)There were a lot of factors involved in the US deciding to get involved with Syria.
In fact, it seems like Israel would rather have the current regime in power due to their relative stability.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)in that many of the world's Jews are and have for a long time been opposed to Zionism.
Zionism is the political movement that espouses for the nation of Israel in the borders that it has waged violent conflict to conquer. There are in fact many Jews opposed to this because it disenfranchises millions of people who call themselves Palestinians without due process of law.
The American government, Wall Street and the media exclude entirely the point of view that this is a repugnant thing to do to Palestinians and a subset of Zionists immediately engage in a defamation campaign against any person who suggests that legal norms should apply to Palestinians and that they should be treated equally. This defamation campaign usually takes the form of calling these people anti-Semites, as the OP does.
As someone with Jewish ancestry, it is glaringly obvious to me that Zionism oppresses Palestinians, and that the subset of Zionists that use defamation to ostracize critics of the oppressive results of Zionism is, in the long run and the short run, no different than any of history's other defamation campaigns, most glaringly that carried out for a thousand years against Jews. It is evil, short-sighted and in the long run puts people with Jewish ancestry in more danger.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)There is certainly diversity of opinion among Israeli and American Jews, and several groups working for a peaceful resolution to the Palestinian question.
dembotoz
(16,922 posts)PDJane
(10,103 posts)are illegal under the international law that the US itself helped to write. Zionism is a way to justify theft by using a book of myths and legends to do so. It's obscene.
LuvNewcastle
(17,821 posts)Everything you said is spot on.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)Helen Thomas is dead and instead of speaking about the hundreds of good things she did in her life I'm gonna bring up the crap. Before she's even in the ground!
LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
How edgy.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)I actually find some completely non-antisemitic truth in her words.
Fundies are extremely Zionist and hate muslims in large part because they wish to USE the Jews to accomplish their armageddon/apocalypse plans as foretold in the bible. You know, all that rapture BS?? And the Koch brothers are among those who appear to believe that, along with half the Supreme Court and a large percentage of elected repukes. We all know that RW-led corporations and the 1% run things, and not The People.
So in a way she was completely correct, and one need not even bring anti-semitism into the discussion. It's NOT about the Jews, per se. It's about biblical prophesy.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Kestrel -- it may amuse you to see I compared her to a species of hawk here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3306177
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)She was an important figure in women's rights. Now that she's gone, we should remember the historic things she did.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ZRT2209
(1,357 posts)AND TODAY IS AN APPROPRIATE DAY TO MAKE THAT POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm not a natural with math, but I'm pretty sure this vile thread has lower approval ratings than either Dick Cheney or Congress.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)It must be great sport, sir. Kind of like bringing down a species of hawk that's almost extinct.
Helen Thomas was a great reporter, fearless and gutsy, and spoke truth to power in ways most of us could only dream of. Let her rest in peace.
Hekate
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But that makes her anti-Semitic comments and speeches all the more disappointing.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Response to Nye Bevan (Original post)
Post removed
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But that doesn't really answer the question.
Violet_Crumble
(36,385 posts)I noticed several people have asked you the same thing and you've not answered any of them. It's coming across like you have an issue with people mourning her passing and you want to focus on the few negative things about her later in her life rather than praise her for the great things she said and did for most of her life...
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)while Israel brutally abuses and expels the Palestinians for being members of the wrong religion; and now you're worried about what Helen Thomas said?!
Why don't you worry about the real bigots: supporters of Apartheid Israel.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)This OP is 100% hilarious coming from a poster who vociferously defends hate speech like "illegals"
lpbk2713
(43,273 posts)
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)No recs to cancel out!
But then I've never exactly been a rec-troller.
On edit: I would fully support the return of unrec. My ability to unrec down crappy threads ("NATIONALIZE THE OIL COMPANIES AND APPLE AND SEND TIM COOK TO PRISON"
would more than make up for the ability of others to unrec down my threads.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and if a DU jury decides that my post violates community standards, I will accept that decision.
pansypoo53219
(23,034 posts)it was anti ISRAEL.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Helen Thomas did have a long and distinguished career.
But comments (by her or anyone else) about how "Zionists" control the government, the media, and financial industry -- and references to their money -- are UGLY. At the very least, they reference UGLY STEREOTYPES. We are better than this.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9680652&mesg_id=9683016
Which I think nails it. I'm surprised by the number of DUers who claim that Thomas' speech was just fine.
CTyankee
(68,198 posts)and disagreement with the views/actions of one of its political parties. Plenty of Israelis disagree with Netanyahu and arch conservatives in Israel, but support the right of Israel to exist. There are some here who are not making that distinction, but, sadly, I have also encountered DUers who feel the state of Israel, per se, should not exist.
Frankly, I would feel better about Thomas's remarks if they didn't smack of old fashioned anti-semitic sentiments dredged up from long ago. History tells us what happened. There are some here who do not consult history, perhaps because it is too painful to do so. And that is unfortunate. We need a debate that is informed by the facts of history, not one that does not engage the truth.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)If you don't want to sound bigoted, you can say something like "the pro-Israel lobby has too much influence on the US Government". But throwing in that the Zionists control Wall Street and Hollywood, and never apologizing for that statement (I'm sure that if she had, someone in this thread would have said so) is very, very, ugly.
CTyankee
(68,198 posts)better. it's very, very ugly as you said, but also ignorant.
TransitJohn
(6,937 posts)Disagreeing with the actions of the Likudniks does not equal anti-Semitism.
If I recall correctly, she said something like, "I'd tell them to get the hell out of Palestine!"
How that can be construed as anti-Semitic I don't know.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,664 posts)She spoke truth to power. Hell, Shrub wouldn't even take a question from her for years!
That said, I had no idea that she doubled down on a "jews own the media/banks" thought processes in her latter years. That makes me sad.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So I guess my question has been answered.
Deep13
(39,157 posts)Frankly, if that is all she said, I'd have to agree. But she went further and said "the Jews" should leave Israel and go home to Europe and America. The problem isn't "the Jews," it's a few Jews who run Israel and enforce aggressive policies and a bunch of Evangelical Christians who run this country.
jessie04
(1,528 posts)Its good to be loved.

Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)If not, why not?