General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsZimmerman was holding Trayvon by the hoodie when Z fell backwards, pulling TM down with him
I'm so sick of the Z story being told as the "official" version, so I'm putting this version out there, based on logic, Rachel's testimony and some astute DUers (ht: SoCalDem).
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3302824
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023245488
1) Z came up behind Trayvon as TM was "getting away" and grabbed him by his sweatshirt on the right side (drawstring pulled all the way down). Z grabbed with his left hand because his gun was in his right hand, already drawn because that's what a wannabe cop would do.
2) Trayvon swung around with his elbow up (do it; stand up and have someone grab you near your shoulder and see what your elbow does) and smacked Z in the nose, right side. This was right when Rachel heard him say "Get offa me! Get offa me!" (let me go).
3) The blow to Z's nose knocked him off his feet and he fell backwards, still holding onto Trayvon's sweatshirt (so he wouldn't get away, because they always do). He falls down on the pavement and smacks the back of his head.
4) Trayvon falls with him because Z is still holding the shirt, and when Trayvon's body hits Z's, his head smacks the ground a second time.
5) Z is still holding the sweatshirt, pointing the gun at him and telling him "you're gonna die tonight motherfucker"
6) Trayvon is screaming at the top of his lungs. This is when John Good sees them with Trayvon on top.
7) Z shoots Trayvon.
You know the rest.
AndyA
(16,993 posts)I'm sure members of the DU George Zimmerman Fan Club will be along soon to dispute this. (They're everywhere it seems.)
K&R
janlyn
(735 posts)I thought immediatly about the time my brother tackled me from the side.Being bigger than I and weighting more he hit the ground first on his back and busted his head open, then I landed on top and the back of my head hit his nose.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We were just little kids pulling hair and clothes, tickling, biting, kicking, wrestling. We were all very close in age, but I was small and got the bad end of the struggles. That's why I do not believe Zimmerman's story. Trayvon Martin was a big kid, and he probably did not want to be followed, but why would he start a physical fight with a stranger unless there was some indication from Zimmerman that trouble was ahead.
People just don't do that.
Trayvon Martin was a kid. He was suspended from school for having traces of marijuana in a plastic bag. He also did graffiti, apparently. He is alleged to have twittered about violence, but I don't find any verifiable reports of starting fights.
Martin was suspended by Miami-Dade County schools because traces of marijuana were found in an empty plastic baggie in his book bag, family spokesman Ryan Julison said. Martin was shot Feb. 26 by Zimmerman while he was visiting Sanford with his father.
Family members and activists stressed that the teen's suspension was irrelevant to the case.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57404732-504083/trayvon-martin-update-school-marijuana-suspension-no-criminal-record/
He was accused of conduct that was unusual for him. If he had been an ever-ready fighter, we would have heard all about it. Remember, accusations from people who do not come forward to talk about specific situations have no credibility.
ileus
(15,396 posts)mzmolly
(50,992 posts)Much more so than Georgie's "he attacked me" after running, scenario.
chowder66
(9,068 posts)I too believe that Z grabbed him at first and I have seen just a mention of the drawstring which I could not find again so this really does fit the scenario well in my opinion.
I believed that it was also an elbow to the nose and something wasn't right about the head-smashing. I believed it was hard debris in the grass that Z got when falling to the ground. I have always thought Z exaggerated the fight/injuries for cover.
Thank you for the run-down.
grasswire
(50,130 posts).....Trayvon was shot while on top of George. But no blood on George. And how did Trayvon get into the position face down, hands under?
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)would not get on Z anyway. The shot causes Trayvon to fall forward onto Z, probably causing him to smack his head a 3rd time.
Z rolls Trayvon's body off of him and that is how Trayvon ended up face down on the grass.
ETA: or, to use Z's words, Z "shimmies" out from under Trayvon's body, leaving it face down in the grass
mbuch64
(55 posts)How could there be no blood from Trayvon on Zimmerman?
Then I saw photos of Trayvon's hoodie and it was not blood soaked and in the crime scene photo of Trayvon after he had been rolled over onto his
back by the first police on the scene, there was no visible blood on Trayvon's
chest. Trayvon was shot in the heart with a hollow point round. Would that not stop his heart from pumping blood at the moment he was shot?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Trayvon's sweatshirt. Trayvon struggled to get away, screamed help, get off me. They fell. The struggle was always for Trayvon to get away and to keep the gun pointed away from him. It's hard to do both things at the same time.
malaise
(268,987 posts)Time will catch up with George Zimmerman.
Can't wait to read the next chapter of his life.
SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)POS does not deserve one.
Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)It is shameful.
MH1
(17,600 posts)I thought that was quite evident.
Cronus Protagonist
(15,574 posts)It was like a warped To Kill A Mockingbird -- Jem got shot, Boo Radley didn't show up and Z had Atticus Finch as a lawyer. Jury and police, well, not much change there, was there?
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)who the feck do they think they are fooling?
alsame
(7,784 posts)were constantly asking that question - why didn't they present their own version of events?
IMO, they did the absolute bare minimum.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)1) Z telling police dispatch that "they always get away" and that he was following Trayvon
2) Rachel hears Trayvon talking with the guy who was following him ("Why you following me?"
3) the right drawstring on Trayvon's hoodie was pulled all the way down, as if someone had grabbed and pulled it (as in, from behind; grabbed at hoodie, got sweatshirt plus drawstring)
4) Rachel's testimony of Travyon yelling "Get offa me! Get offa me!" (which means: LET GO OF ME)
5) Z's bloody nose consistent with an elbow hit from the right side, same side as drawstring pulled
6) Z's head injuries, consistent with him falling backwards after being hit in the nose with an elbow, and pulling Trayvon down with him to land on top of him
Yep, you're right, there is no evidence to support this theory.
calimary
(81,247 posts)Yeah. No evidence.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)was appointed by Scott. Nuff said.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)so the effort was dismal; still, it is a disgrace that any thinking person believed Zimmerman's RIDICULOUS story
billh58
(6,635 posts)racist assholes took a dive, and gave the defense a free rein to convince an equally racist jury that Zimmerman was the victim, and Trayvon was the aggressor.
The Koch Brothers-supported NRA and their right-wing gun hugger supporters couldn't let a white boy go down for killing a black kid, so the racist Florida judicial system allowed a another racist to get away with cold-blooded murder.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Since SYG was created there have been ten black on white SYG killings. Of those ten, 4 justified, 2 guilty, 4 pending. So it isn't automatically guilty if a black kills a white.
ETA: Link: http://www.tampabay.com/stand-your-ground-law/fatal-cases
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Speculation - and that is what this scenario is - won't get a conviction. The prosecution's job is to say, "The IS what happened." not "This is what could have happened."
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)have them on the ground with t on top.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)and yet the jury bought it.
I haven't worked that bit of info into my scenario yet, because I haven't studied it well enough.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)him to prevent him from 'getting away'.
i don't believe there was any significant fight because neither had any significant injury. and z's trip 'to look for an address' doesn't ring true at all. he continued looking for martin. he could have seen an address from his vehicle.
i believe he tried to detain martin in some way, why else would he keep stalking him after the police had been called? what did he plan to do if he found him?
Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)the sick and twisted smile on Zimmerman's fat face as he held Martin up with a gun.
alsame
(7,784 posts)that the neighbor John Good claims to have seen were Trayvon fighting to keep GZ's arms pinned down so he couldn't shoot. Remember, Good said he didn't see any impact, just the arm movements and he made the assumption it was an MMA beating.
Oh yeah, Trayvon's two other arms were smothering GZ and reaching for the gun.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)MH1
(17,600 posts)I guess because I don't watch fights on tv and have no idea what "MMA style" means, but thought it was interesting given that Zimmerman was taking MMA classes.
But seriously, he couldn't really see that well to be sure what it was he was seeing, why is he saying "MMA style blows" at all, and not, "I saw the guy on top moving his arms a lot but I wasn't sure what he was doing"?
To me the guy who also looked bad in this trial was Good. (ironic name for that guy, huh). Just that point about his testimony alone makes it seem like he was crafting his testimony to support Z.
alsame
(7,784 posts)until this trial. I still don't know what it looks like. But I remember clearly that Good said he didn't see any actual contact, just arm movements. And he decided it looked like MMA.
A good prosecutor would have asked him to explain or even demonstrate what he thinks he saw and make the case it could have been something else, like Trayvon trying to keep GZ's arms down.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)often to win a fight, rather than just knock someone out brawling on your feet, you go to the ground and try to get on top of your opponent like that.
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)You and MH1 don't watch enough teevee I guess
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)Makes the most sense of anything I've seen written. Even if TV intentionally threw his elbow back knowing Z hsd grabbed him, he was well justified. After thinking about it, I would do the same to defend myself.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)This version explains the scratches on Zimmermans back of the head and the bloody nose.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Doesn't a pulled shirt have a higher bullet hole than one that was falling?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)as good/rational/logical/objective as any zimPIG apology I've read.
MaeScott
(878 posts)SoCalMusicLover
(3,194 posts)Very plausible. Unfortunately there are only 2 people who know what happened, and one of them is dead. The other made up a story because if he told the truth, he'd be in prison right now.
Killed in cold blood Mr. Martin was. I'd like to hear his story which would be much closer to the truth.
DrewFlorida
(1,096 posts)was in the murderer's hand prior to the confrontation.
If only there had been a "Good Guy With a Gun" around to save the innocent Trayvon.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)I'll never buy the story that Z followed Trayvon without his gun drawn. Z does not have the character and courage for that. He followed, feeling empowered and protected, by a drawn gun.
Trayvon felt he was fighting for his life.
Also, not sure Z was knocked into the pavement at all. What he had on the back of this head was blades of grass. Grass does not grow on concrete. Why didn't the prosecution go into this anomaly? This is why Z had abrasions but not very severe ones. Not the kind you'd have from being actually knocked against concrete.
chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)Nothing in this case bugs me more than the storyline of Martin attacking Zimmerman. It is. Entirely the defense storyline that somehow morphed into the facts.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)I thought GZ grabbed TM from behind also, and maybe TM's head hit GZ or he head butted him. GZ only hit the back of his head falling backwards, and then pulled TM down. When TM tried to get up he held his hoodie and shot him.
I can't understand why the prosecution didn't state some similar theory? The MMA trainer and fighting experts would have to say it was impossible to be punching people bare handed without any bruising or blood or DNA on your hands...and no defensive bruises or blood on anyone's arms either...
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)I have no doubt Z already had the gun drawn. That's what cowards do.
LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)is that Zimmerman is left handed. I saw him taking notes during the trial and he was using his left hand. or maybe that was a ruse?
Wouldn't he put the gun in his left hand and grab the hoodie with his right hand? Or maybe he didn't have the gun drawn until later?
Unfortunately for Travyon, we'll never know.
edit: spelling
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)He grabbed with his left hand because 1) his gun was in his right hand, because he SHOOTS right handed (and thus, his holster on the right side) and 2) he is left handed.
alsame
(7,784 posts)Yesterday, Mark Ostermann testified that he and Zimmerman have practiced shooting with their non-dominant hands. Whichever hand can get to the firearm, thats the one you would use, Osterman told the court. If Zimmermans non-dominant hand is the right one then why did the defenses expert witness testify that Zimmerman was right-handed? After Di Maios very confident time on the stand, was that just a slip of the tongue?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/07/09/zimmerman-is-right-handed/
ceonupe
(597 posts)I know a few left hand shooters that shoot with their right hand dominant and have for ever.
Their is not always a relationship between the hand you write with and the hand you shoot with.
If zimmerman wore his holster as he described in the video he would be right hand dominant shooter.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)All firearms, except very expensive custom ones, are made for the right hand. So even left-handed shooters have to learn to shoot right handed.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Do you also believe that the Italian Captain tripped into the lifeboat instead of helping people?
tblue
(16,350 posts)GZ should go to jail for scaring a kid like that. Imagine how terrified poor Trayvon was! He saw the gun, he saw the hate, and he had no idea who this creep was following and accosting him. How would any of us feel? What would you think? Oh that poor baby!!!!!!!! Damn that useless blob. Please let him wind up in prison soon before he terrorizes another person. He belongs with his own murdering kind, not free to roam our streets frightening children while carrying a loaded gun.
Your account of events sure fits the evidence I have heard and seen. GZ's story was nothing but a lie starting with the first 911 call.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)had struck you in the face hard enough to knock you down and was then sitting atop of you, most likely with with his knees on your arms, pounding your head into the ground repeatedly, you would have suffered enough damage to be virtually defenseless. The possibility of you pulling a gun and shooting him at that point is at best remote, even if you were one very tough customer.
tblue
(16,350 posts)inept bag of bones the defense & that MMA expert witness said GZ is supposed to be. He has ZERO skills despite months of training and working out. He was just one hopeless, helpless giant toddler that night, for all intents and purposes. Just couldn't do shit.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Zimmerman has no problem when he was bouncer like throwing a woman against a wall.
tblue
(16,350 posts)AND a saint!!!!
moondust
(19,981 posts)I had kind of thought Trayvon may have screamed bloody murder when surprised by the sight of Zimmerman's gun, and of course was then abruptly silenced when it discharged into his heart. I don't know what else would have prompted a sudden "death scream" like that except the sudden horror of impending doom. (This theory only changes the moment when the gun appeared. I'm not sure Trayvon would have continued to engage if the gun had appeared early in the encounter.)
Zimmerman had no reason to abruptly stop screaming for help and police since he claims he didn't know "the suspect" was dead and even tried to further subdue him after the shot.
jimboss
(28 posts)but Trayvon had already reached his home .
Joe Hyperion
(58 posts)You said Zimmerman was holding the hoodie. Did any fingerprint come out of that?
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)Are you joking?
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)Based on everything else, I'd be willing to bet a while bunch that they didn't.
Not to mention that the clothing was packed in plastic bags, I believe, which the ME complained about.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)Zimmerman's clothes (front of his shirt/jacket) because an elbow blow won't create as much blood as a broken nose.
I was thinking this also, after the elbow to the nose theory was presented in a thread I started yesterday, but I didn't want to bump my thread by responding (was getting out of control).
SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)an amazing Detective Agency. Nice one!
And it goes with the idea of Trayvon saying 'get off, get off' as leave me alone, instead of actually physically getting off of him from a horizontal position as so many people assume he means.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)consider this one
SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)And by the way, if you watch the re-enactment tape again, Zimmerman pauses and hems and haws at those places where you have Zimmerman saying those things he declared that Trayvon said. I think it's my Mother's instinct that is picking up on where he is not telling the truth in that re-enactment.
zencycler
(9 posts)While it would have helped greatly if the prosecution put forth this, or ANY, alternate theory of what happened that night, then in addition to showing how the evidence matched their version of events, they'd have to show how some of the factors you've mentioned disprove Zimmerman's version.
In some cases, like the pulled drawstring, the factors you've mentioned might have equally occurred either under your theory or at any point during the type of event Zimmerman described. However, Rachel's testimony about Trayvon saying "get off, get off" doesn't seen to fit with Zimmerman's version of events.
So in addition to not presenting an alternate theory, this is where the prosecution fell short. They didn't do a better job of prepping Rachel to be more credible to that jury, and they didn't more effectively use or emphasize her statements of TM saying "get off" to disprove Zimmerman's version of events.
dmr
(28,347 posts)I hate, hate, hate that Zimmerman's self-serving story line is taken as gospel.
I've even wondered if Zimmerman slipped and fell on the wet grass, smacking his head or nose. Imagine how angry Zimmerman would have been if Trayvon laughed at him?
He didn't have to shoot Trayvon. It hurts every time I think of that moment. But, then again, that would leave a live witness to Zimmerman's exceptionally poor judgement.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)But yeah, if that video could be enhanced to show that....
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Zimmerman and martin were in a fight. It wouldn't be to unusual for a fight to mess up the draw strings on a hoodie, so that would not prove who started the fight.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And once Trayvon started screaming (because there was a strange man who had followed him and now was trying to detain him), Zimmerman panicked and shot him.
billh58
(6,635 posts)judicial system allowed Zimmerman to get away with cold-blooded murder. Those who are defending Zimmerman's actions on this thread are attempting to justify the necessity for CCW and SYG from the NRA "gunz are the answer, so buy more" playbook, and have absolutely no empathy for the victims of gun violence.
Spazito
(50,332 posts)I have always believed this is more likely what happened. Zimmerman's version was never credible, imo.