General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmadashelltoo
(1,830 posts)But, it's the world being created by the gun hustlers.
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)
longship
(40,416 posts)I don't remember that Bugs Bunny toon.
It certainly is appropriate.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Bugs notices high bounties on various animals. There is a $50 bounty (about $480 today) on foxes, $75 (about $720 today) on bears, but then is offended by the two-cent bounty (about $0.19 today) on rabbits. Bugs has himself mailed to Washington DC, where a supercilious game commissioner explains that the bounty is so low because, while foxes and bears are "obnoxious" animals who damage property, "rabbits are perfectly harmless". Bugs vows to prove that he can do just as bad and storms out, slamming the game commissioner's door so hard that the glass in it shatters.
Bugs begins his campaign by attacking a guard with his own billy club. From there, he pulls stunts like renaming Barney Baruch's private bench as "Bugs Bunny", painting barbershop-pole stripes on the Washington Monument, rewiring the lights in Times Square to read "Bugs Bunny Wuz Here", shutting down Niagara Falls, selling the entire island of Manhattan back to Native Americans, sawing Florida off from the rest of the country, swiping all the locks off the Panama Canal, filling in the Grand Canyon, and literally tying up railroad tracks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebel_Rabbit
I have it uncut on Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 3.
longship
(40,416 posts)KatyMan
(4,340 posts)especially the sawing off of Florida, that was funny. I remember being quite young back in the 70s and wondering if it could be done!
R Merm
(444 posts)malaise
(296,118 posts)Wish I could rec
Catherina
(35,568 posts)The Florida system of injustice explained in a simple graphic. SYG enables vigilantism for cowards, bigots, and racists.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)the defense's position, which the jury apparently believed, is that Trayvon did a whole lot more than that. (Sat on him, punching him, pounding his head against the ground, and other allegations Trayvon cannot testify about)
(A contention I disagree with, but it makes the analogy in that image invalid)
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)zimmerman knew exactly what to claim to sell his bullshit story to white people who think exactly like him.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I felt the forensic evidence showed Zimmerman's claims to not be credible, including his injuries, but the jury disagrees.
I think if he'd taken the stand, it would have gone the other way.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)The trial was lost by 1) jury selection, 2) weak prosecution and 3) jury instructions that forbid consideration of Zimmerman's actions prior to whatever physical altercation took place.
This interview was in evidence at the trial. Serino and Singleton nail him here -- he wasn't looking for a street sign:
Zimmerman: No, I pulled over and stopped before I called.
Serino: OK. OK.
(plays tape 1:44 to 2:07)
Serino: OK. Full sprint, full-on flight jogging, trotting describe the run.
Zimmerman: I dont remember. I just, cause I was on the phone. It happened so quickly.
Serino: Well, ah, I understand that, George, but I guess that its um if it was a bicycle theft I could say OK, but its kinda important. I mean, was he running as to evade you, get away from you, ah, maybe got tired of getting wet in the rain. What kinda run was it? I mean, it sounds like hes running as to get away from you.
Zimmerman: I dont know why he was running.
Serino: But what kinda run was it? Cant say?
Zimmerman: I dont know.
Serino: OK.
(plays tape 2:08 to 2:10)
Serino: OK, is that you getting out of the car?
Zimmerman: Yes.
Serino: OK.
Singleton: So as soon as he runs, youre getting out of the car to follow him.
Zimmerman: When he says which way are you running, I turned off the ignition.
Singleton: I dont know.
(plays tape 2:10 to 2:14)
Serino: At that point youre out of the car?
Zimmerman: I think so.
Serino: OK, so you basically jumped out of the car to see where he was going?
Zimmerman: Yes, sir.
Serino: OK. Thats not fear. You know what I mean?
Zimmerman: Yes, sir.
Serino: Thats one of the problems I have with the whole thing, or Im gonna have. I mean, I dont have any problems at all, its just that its gonna be a problem.
Apparently it wasn't a problem for this jury.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Too much shit was allowed in that amounts to testimony, but never cross-examined because he didn't take the stand.
A very peculiar case.
Pelican
(1,156 posts)It's a gross over simplification to just blather that all the black folks agree with one side and only white people think otherwise.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Pelican
(1,156 posts)Take your post...
... and swap out the words Zimmerman for Martin or Crump and white to black.
I'll wait....
Ok, done? Try and tell me that wouldn't have been alerted on as racist in about 4 seconds. If you're honest, you know what the answer is.
Squinch
(59,522 posts)after me, and I run, and he keeps coming after me, and I somehow get him down on the ground, I'm going to do everything I can to make sure he can't come after me again. To me, that's still simply self defense.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)In fact, I even agree that Zimmerman likely brandished his firearm at some point before the physical altercation. Otherwise, how does Trayvon Martin allegedly know to grab for it, as Zimmerman alleged?
However, the defense contended otherwise, and the jury believed it.
Unfortunately, by winning the fight, Zimmerman forever silenced the only other witness to the start of the fight.
Moostache
(11,179 posts)He CHOSE to pursue Martin.
He CHOSE to ignore police saying to stay in his vehicle.
He CHOSE to engage and fight rather than question and ascertain if Martin was lost or needed assistance (which is what fucking neighborhood watch is SUPPOSED TO DO....they are to observe, watch and assist , NOT judge, sentence and execute.)
He CHOSE to fire a lethal shot instead of warning shot in the air or disabling shot to the leg or arm....he shot to kill, which was his intention from the moment he uttered that crap about "fucking punks" on...
He could have CHOSEN differently in every case and regardless of the fucked laws of some racist backwoods state, he is eternally guilty and the face of a serious issue that will not go away - racism and the idea that black people being hunted is OK.
The second he got out of that vehicle was the exact moment that he became an aggressive criminal and a murderer. Shame on the prosecution for their ham-handed and inept handling of the case. Shame on the bigots who cheered the verdict and miscarriage of justice. Shame on Florida and may that stain remain until the day they (and every other state with these abominations of law) repeal the Stand Your Ground law. We have become so dangerously detached from the rule of law that we are careening down the slippery slope and gaining momentum instead of slowing the descent.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... and yet the Jury concludes that Zimmy STOPS initiating the action, and then Martin instigates the fight.
Pelican
(1,156 posts)Warning shots and shots to wound are illegal and for good reason....
1) Gravity. Bullets come back down...
2) If you feel there is enough threat to fire then there is enough threat to kill. Additionally, if you have the time to take a clean shot at an arm or a leg then its unlikely you are in immediate danger.
3) It is amazing how many lawyers on DU would have prosecuted the case differently. It's shocking I tell you...
napkinz
(17,199 posts)nt
aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)But juries in high profile cases almost never make the right call. A jury thought it was Zimmerman desperately screaming for help even though the screaming ends with a gunshot. A jury found OJ not guilty in the first trial. A jury found the LAPD not guilty of anything in the Rodney King beating including filing a false police report which didn't agree at all with the video.
Seems like many juries couldn't follow the plot of a Scooby Doo cartoon. Heck, some of them would want to convict the dog.
reusrename
(1,716 posts)Only that the shooter "claim" he thought it was life threatening.
Zimmerman was never in fear for his life. That's just stupid. He was armed and dangerous and he knew it.
aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)But you're correct that in reality it doesn't have to be life threatening
reusrename
(1,716 posts)There's nothing reasonable about it.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)giving him an "MMA-style" pounding?
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)And be contradicted by three other witnesses who saw the guy on top?
