General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOccupy KC hopes police will waive cost of protest
Protesters from the Occupy Kansas City movement want to march on downtown streets Dec. 30.
But they dont have the $4,100 fee to pay police officers to shut down traffic near Ninth and Main streets to ensure their safety. So an attorney representing the group asked the Board of Police Commissioners on Friday for an indigency waiver, prompting this discussion:
Whose budget is tighter: The movements or the citys?
Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/16/3323816/occupy-kc-hopes-police-will-waive.html#ixzz1gqHvJYbe
MindMover
(5,016 posts)it had to come to this point.....
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6478048523/" title="aviary (2) by pbmus, on Flickr"><img src="
" width="500" height="309" alt="aviary (2)"></a>
xmas74
(30,052 posts)peaceful. Little to no reports have been made about it until now.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)It will be interesting to see how this turns out.
xmas74
(30,052 posts)In the article Sly James even made a comment about how good the relations have been so far. Of course, if you read the comments...
Don't even read them. We both live in the area and know exactly what they say.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)xmas74
(30,052 posts)I wonder about that.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)And they sure have enough of those here in KC.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)MindMover
(5,016 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)MindMover
(5,016 posts)the spirit....
xmas74
(30,052 posts)Instead, they have to pay for the right to do so.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Yep. Gotta love the Land of the Free (TM)...
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)No one has the right to just take over the streets and block traffic as a means of protest. From the little information given, it appears that the city's ordinance is well within constitutional limits.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Time,+Place,+and+Manner+Restrictions
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)The issue is whether this is the least restrictive manner of serving a significant government interest. If streets or public areas must be blocked off in order to protect public safety, the police will be involved. Most municipalities have ordinances that govern this procedure. As long as they are reasonable and apply equally to any applicant, the courts generally uphold them.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)The city can spend $4,100 to allow Occupy KC to protest without charge in a civilized way...
or Occupy KC can take to the streets anyways, and the city will have to spend far more than $4,100 to bring out riot cops and deal with street blockades...
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)xmas74
(30,052 posts)so far and there are people out there waiting for any misstep.
I really hope it doesn't come to that.
I predict a great deal of "concern" happening here if they do it.
RedRocco
(454 posts)unkachuck
(6,295 posts)"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government, after paying a Petition Fee, for a redress of grievances."
....oh, there it is...."...after paying a Petition Fee,..."
Modern_Matthew
(1,604 posts)It looks so pathetic trying to obtain permits and go to court to fight for what is already your right.