Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 09:58 AM Aug 2013

North Carolina First State To Eliminate Federal Unemployment Benefits

"The North Carolina General Assembly recently decided to implement cuts to unemployment benefits as well as the maximum number of weeks one can receive unemployment funds. But altering unemployment benefits before the end of 2013 means North Carolina has been disqualified from receiving federal unemployment funding.

"This makes North Carolina the first state in the nation to be denied federal unemployment benefits. Today on The State of Things, host Frank Stasio talks with Laura Leslie, the capitol bureau chief for WRAL; Mitch Kokai, the director of communications at the John Locke Foundation; and Bill Rowe, the general counsel and director of advocacy at the North Carolina Justice Center.

http://wunc.org/post/north-carolina-first-state-eliminate-federal-unemployment-benefits


No one should be surprised if North Carolina adopts the Hawaiian solution of buying one-way tickets to leave the State for those in need of financial help.
http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/07/31/hawaii-offers-homeless-one-way-tickets-out-of-state/
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina First State To Eliminate Federal Unemployment Benefits (Original Post) AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 OP
This is going to be interesting to watch... diabeticman Aug 2013 #1
The crazy is on the loose down there BeyondGeography Aug 2013 #2
Amazing...I will be paying close attention to this. SummerSnow Aug 2013 #3
Yes, they want a mass exodus. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #5
Yup, that's exactly the plan Wednesdays Aug 2013 #11
Use the exodus wisely GlashFordan Aug 2013 #22
so do they think that this only hurts minorities? warrior1 Aug 2013 #4
Unlikely. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #6
some North Carolinians will die as a result of their policies zazen Aug 2013 #7
While poverty is increasing, they also hate poor White people as well. With respect to welfare: AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #10
Yeah, but building a mote around the state to make it an island going to create too many jobs? RC Aug 2013 #8
It's "Shock Doctrine" state by state. --nt CrispyQ Aug 2013 #9
at some point you'd think the feds would have to seize n.c. b/c it just doesnt resemble america leftyohiolib Aug 2013 #12
Does it have oil? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #15
For clarification, billh58 Aug 2013 #13
Strictly voluntary? If you know the history of the cities that adopted this "voluntary" relocation AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #16
It's very billh58 Aug 2013 #18
No. The logic is that there is a history of police "helping" the destitute decide to "voluntarily" AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #20
Actually, I have been billh58 Aug 2013 #23
Let me go get my copy of Dante . . . Brigid Aug 2013 #14
If secession isn't an option, can we evict them from the Union? MadrasT Aug 2013 #17
haters benefit--like Medicaid cuts and sales tax increases, this HURTS business zazen Aug 2013 #21
When are the NC elections? Dwayne Hicks Aug 2013 #19
lol, idoicracy at its finest. when people leave in mass okieinpain Aug 2013 #25
one nation, under Gaud onethatcares Aug 2013 #24
So then the Republican legislature mick063 Aug 2013 #26
Sounds good burnodo Aug 2013 #27
I'm normally for freedom of speech... Initech Aug 2013 #28

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
3. Amazing...I will be paying close attention to this.
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 10:06 AM
Aug 2013

Ok so if you lose your job ...what? This should make baggers happy this is what they wanted. Expect a mass exodus of NC citizens leaving .


 

GlashFordan

(216 posts)
22. Use the exodus wisely
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 01:50 PM
Aug 2013

The migration of Democratic voters to Virginia and possibly Georgia or Florida might bring a couple more purple states onboard.

IMHO, if people don't like state they live in, then move. Progressives in Arizona should move to California, conservatives in California should go to Idaho.

warrior1

(12,325 posts)
4. so do they think that this only hurts minorities?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 10:14 AM
Aug 2013

It sounds like they are driving a stake into their own state. This will be devastating over all.

What a bunch of maroons.

zazen

(2,978 posts)
7. some North Carolinians will die as a result of their policies
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 10:25 AM
Aug 2013

I keep saying this: it's ethnic cleansing. I grew up in a NC town infamous for its racism. I know how these people think.

They HATE poor black people on welfare. They imagine there are some hippy havens where white people are living off the public dole too, and they hate the urban intellectuals (and the local sustainable ag growing up around the urban centers), but it's mostly black people whom they think are lazy and violent and have too many babies they can't support--who are, to them, subhuman, and thus can and should be treated as such.

They turned away Medicaid dollars that would have covered 500,000 more people.

I wouldn't be surprised if there start to be suicides on the steps of the legislature or in front of the Governor's Mansion. They're f-ing monsters.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
10. While poverty is increasing, they also hate poor White people as well. With respect to welfare:
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 10:31 AM
Aug 2013
In 1996, ... After reforms, which President Clinton said would "end Welfare as we know it",[43][dead link] amounts from the federal government were given out in a flat rate per state based on population.[44][dead link] Each state must meet certain criteria to ensure recipients are being encouraged to work themselves out of Welfare. The new program is called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).[45][46] It encourages states to require some sort of employment search in exchange for providing funds to individuals, and imposes a five-year lifetime limit on cash assistance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare#United_States
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
8. Yeah, but building a mote around the state to make it an island going to create too many jobs?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 10:28 AM
Aug 2013
No one should be surprised if North Carolina adopts the Hawaiian solution of buying one-way tickets to leave the State for those in need of financial help.
 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
12. at some point you'd think the feds would have to seize n.c. b/c it just doesnt resemble america
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:17 PM
Aug 2013

billh58

(6,655 posts)
13. For clarification,
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:27 PM
Aug 2013

"the Hawaiian solution" is strictly voluntary, and well-supervised. Anyone who wants to take advantage of the program must have proof of an established support system in place and available at their destination. There are homeless people who are trapped in Hawaii with absolutely no way to get home, as hitchhiking to Arizona from here is difficult to say the least. All Hawaii is doing is providing a means to travel if people wish to return to their families.

Hawaii has excellent unemployment insurance coverage, medical assistance, and actually cares for its people, including the homeless. North Carolina -- not so much, so comparing the two states is disingenuous at best.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
16. Strictly voluntary? If you know the history of the cities that adopted this "voluntary" relocation
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:48 PM
Aug 2013

scheme, with cops who help the impoverished to decide to "voluntarily" relocate, you should not expect this.

See, e.g., Hawaii Buys One-Way Tickets For the Impoverished. Expect Cops to Help "Run Them Out of Town"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023385311

"If you’re a state with the highest rate of homelessness in the country, you’ve got a number of options. You could build more shelters. You could enact new tax credits for the working poor. Maybe provide more counseling and other services.

"Or you could take the route lawmakers in Hawaii did: offer homeless residents a one-way ticket out of the state.

"State legislators passed funding this year for a new program to offer one-way flights to any of the state’s estimated 17,000 homeless persons. Lawmakers appropriated $100,000 over the next two years for the “return-to-home” program, but that funding could increase if the initiative is viewed as a success.
...
"The problem is that in many cities that have implemented similar programs, like New York, San Francisco, and Baton Rouge, “voluntary” doesn’t always mean voluntary, particularly when a city’s police department gets involved. When a homeless person has a run-in with the law, they are often presented with a choice: go to jail or “volunteer” for a one-way ticket. In addition, there is little verification that the person using the one-way ticket will have any better opportunity at their destination, because at that point Hawaii has shed its responsibility for providing care and services.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/07/29/2371121/hawaii-homeless/

billh58

(6,655 posts)
18. It's very
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 01:03 PM
Aug 2013

convincing when you link your own OP, and a poorly-researched piece from ThinkProgress. This program is strictly voluntary with stipulations that are designed to prevent abuse by law enforcement AND the homeless. I have personally helped homeless people on Maui who wanted nothing more than to return to their families on the Mainland, so I am very familiar with the problem.

Some people come here in hopes of settling in and making a home for themselves in "paradise," and spend their last few dollars on the gamble that "things will work out." When that doesn't happen and they can't find jobs, they become homeless, and it is truly heartbreaking. That is when the Aloha Spirit kicks in, and Hawaii people try to help if they can. Hawaii has always been like this.

The "Mainland Mentality" does exist in a few places in Hawaii, but mainly in those resort pockets which have been occupied by Mainlanders. Hawaii is as different from anyplace on the Mainland as is possible, and we're trying to keep it that way.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
20. No. The logic is that there is a history of police "helping" the destitute decide to "voluntarily"
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 01:38 PM
Aug 2013

relocate elsewhere.

Disregarding such history and such logic does not justify you saying that the ThinkProgress piece is poorly-researched.

Your I've-got-my-Hawaii-and-now-the-ladder-should-be-pulled-up attitude is showing.

billh58

(6,655 posts)
23. Actually, I have been
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:07 PM
Aug 2013

here since before Hawaii was a state, so I've seen the damage that the Mainland Mentality has done. I can assure you that the police in Hawaii do not "harass" the homeless unless they break the law.

As far as pulling up the ladder, I admit I had that attitude when I was a young buck, but have long since lost it. You can disparage the Hawaii police all you want, but I highly suspect that you have no first hand knowledge of what you're railing against. In small communities like Hawaii, the police are our neighbors, friends, and relatives so we know them pretty well. Do we have occasional bad apples? Of course we do, but SHOPO and the various county Chiefs of Police are very good at house cleaning when its necessary.

The pilot project to assist the homeless who want to return to the Mainland, and can prove that they have a support system in place at their destination, will by-and-large be successful. It will also take the pressure off of the limited resources available for the caring of these individuals in Hawaii.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
14. Let me go get my copy of Dante . . .
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:28 PM
Aug 2013

There must be a special circle of hell reserved for the NC General Assembly.

ETA: Circle 8, Bolgia 5. Corrupt Politicians go there.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
17. If secession isn't an option, can we evict them from the Union?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:54 PM
Aug 2013

It seems increasingly like some of these state legislatures full-o-teabaggers are pure evil incarnate.

How does the state of NC benefit from doing this? Specifically what group of people are benefitting from this decision? I don't understand.

(runs off to the Googlez....)

zazen

(2,978 posts)
21. haters benefit--like Medicaid cuts and sales tax increases, this HURTS business
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 01:42 PM
Aug 2013

That unemployment money would have been immediately spent in our NC economy. This will INCREASE our unemployment rate, since it'll throw some more people out of work.

It's spite. They want the satisfaction of knowing they're making the poor, esp those who've voted Democratic, suffer.

We're enjoying our last tax-free shopping weekend starting tomorrow (Repubs just ended that too)--the one where middle to lower income families might save 50-150 dollars when buying a low-end laptops and school supplies and clothes.

Whom does this hurt? Retailers.

Fools.

 

Dwayne Hicks

(637 posts)
19. When are the NC elections?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 01:06 PM
Aug 2013

I can't possible see how people can vote these tea party extremists back into the NC legislature. But then again it is NC. I will be following NC closely.

okieinpain

(9,397 posts)
25. lol, idoicracy at its finest. when people leave in mass
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:22 PM
Aug 2013

They wont have enough workers and customers. So their dearly beloved companies will show the baggers how much loyalty they have by closing down and moving to the states that everyone has moved too.

They will then have to spend millions trying to get people to move back. Lol.

onethatcares

(16,985 posts)
24. one nation, under Gaud
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:11 PM
Aug 2013

except for you poor fuckers that lost your jobs.

Go fuck yourselves and starve.

North Carolina, I gotta get my grandson outa there, even Floriduh hasn't gone that batshit crazy yet.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
26. So then the Republican legislature
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:30 PM
Aug 2013

will lower taxes to lure business, and when business relocates there, will complain there is a shortage of skilled workers.

States compete for "race to the bottom" and the American worker will be expected to be migrants, following them to whatever state offers the sweetest deal.

In the case of Walmart, new streets with lighting and turn signals will be offered. Not a sweetener that the mom and pop shops will ever realize.

Initech

(108,694 posts)
28. I'm normally for freedom of speech...
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 05:49 PM
Aug 2013

But I honestly wouldn't mind if we rounded up every copy of Atlas Shrugged and threw them in a massive bonfire. Fuck this anti worker Ayn Rand garbage.:get:

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»North Carolina First Stat...