General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have a quiz for my fellow DUers... how many riots happen when a Bible is burned?
First, let's start with that question.
marybourg
(13,640 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Boojatta
(12,231 posts)yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)seems kind of wasteful though, why not save for kindling?
Son of Gob
(1,502 posts)It only has 71 views.
Red Mountain
(2,343 posts)Without having watched it
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Here's one I looked for the other day while working on my SIL's POS
yurbud
(39,405 posts)shit out of them, invade their countries, and try to install puppet governments that sign over their natural resources?
If right wingers are worried about religious violence, they should consider leading by example and figuring things to give the people over there to live for besides religion.
Hell, that would be a good idea for you guys here.
malaise
(296,098 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,879 posts)You hit the nail right on the head there.
msongs
(73,752 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Islamophobic fear-mongering?
Burning a Bible in a peaceful situation is nowhere near a valid comparison to the impact of burning the Koran in present-day Afghanistan.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Unless Denmark isn't peaceful anymore?
polly7
(20,582 posts)I have no idea why you're asking me this.
The Danish newspaper apologized, take it up with them. It's also a far different situation than burning Korans in Afghanistan. Not my fault if you can't see the difference.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)....the idea that the location or the political situation in the area where the "outrage" generated from makes a difference as to the resulting reaction is foolish. Riots and protests have started over the rumored threat of someone burning a Koran.
kctim
(3,575 posts)so it will be met only with weak excuses and how it's somehow "different."
veganlush
(2,049 posts)many modern Christians are way,way less devout than most followers of say, the Quran. I live in America. Most people that I know that claim to be religious and go to church regularly, etc...only follow those teachings and commandments of their faith that are convenient. Many American Christians are simply hedging their bets on the kingdom of heaven, doing as little as possible In the way of what their faith apparently requires. In many predominantly Muslim countries, it's not unusual to see most of the people falling to the ground in prayer five times a day for example. Most of the men wear beards. The women have subordinate roles in society and often have to cover themselves, etc. Most "Christians" that i know follow very little of the tenets of their religion. They are just not that into it so naturally their reaction to a bible burning would be much less dramatic.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Bibles are burned, there are still more Bibles and that the ideas in the Bible won't be lost.
The Koran should inspire equal confidence. But from the Muslim point of view, someone burning a Koran is trying to make a point and it's that point they are reacting to.
<POE>
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)It will be interesting to see if those espousing intersectional feminism will even dare to bring up the role of Islam.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,545 posts)Bonhomme Richard
(9,545 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Curious what the OP would think of this.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)If there was an invading army from a Muslim nation camped in Mississippi, and they burned a stack of Bibles, what do you think would happen? That is after all the equivalent of the incident you are talking about. Do you really believe there would NOT be riots?
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)But if you burn a Koran HERE, in America, riots happen in places where the US Army isn't present.
Anyone got an answer for that? Hello? No responses? Aw, man.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I don't remember any such event so we don't really know what would happen, do we?
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)fact is, we ARE in Afghanistan, we've been there for many years, and we've used and manipulated the people of Afghanistan for decades to advance an agenda to benefit us- not the Afghans.
no, it SHOULDN'T be that way, but it is. Your comparison is flawed.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)What US Army invasion force is located there?
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)OP if you have a response to Richard here I'd love to hear it.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)And then you have a legitimate question.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)I'm talking about within the past century.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Answer none. They can't even take out a tiny Jewish country that is surrounded by Arab countries although they certainly have tried.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Back when Christianity was about the same age that Islam is now, my oh my but the streets of Europe were running red with the blood of Christians killing each other. Of course this took place after several "crusades" where the Christians went off to kill all those not Christian (tho' some Christians who had the audacity to have nice cities and stuff were often treated to the same stuff as the "infidels"
.
So, um, what was your point again? I imagine you're trying to imply Christianity is oh-so-much more sophisticated than Islam? Less violent? Less oppressive? Yeah, I think you're on the wrong board or that.
Julie
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)But if your spitoon lands within 10 feet of a Koran you're Public Enemy #1.
This is a fact that is pretty hard to dispute, and I'm talking about the modern age, not the Crusades. In the modern age Wiccans practice openly, in the past, not so much.
sinkingfeeling
(57,835 posts)and burn Bibles. I'd be willing to bet you would a) be cursed at, b) beaten up, c) arrested, and d) probably shot at.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)But I want to know why you can get in the news and have the WORLD pile on you for burning a Koran in your back yard when you could turn around and burn a Bible in your back yard the next day and no one but a handful of obscure backwater mountain men (at WORST) bats an eyelash.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)it appears to be an expression of your opinion that Christianity is better than Islam.
But to answer your rhetorical question, I don't know, but I bet it is very few.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)and protest the excesses and corruption of Wall Street?
How many teabaggers stomp on a woman's head if she shows up at their rally?
Oh, yeah. We're SO much more civilized
Maybe the point is that muslims generally dont seem to go around burning bibles.....? I dont know. Maybe they do....and i just dont know it.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Malawi:
http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE6940HY20101005
Egypt:
How many anti-Muslim riots were inspired by these acts?
Bonhomme Richard
(9,545 posts)religion just seems to bring out the worst in them. If burning books was the worst that religions did the world would be a much safer place.
EC
(12,287 posts)If Moslems burned it, I'm guessing the whole right wing would be up in arms.
Your question is the point that crazy preacher in Florida was what he was trying to prove by burning the quran. That the Moslem religion was a violent religion. But I contend that if Moslems burned the bible out of spite and hate that Christians here would be just as violent and upset as they would be if we burned the quran.
randome
(34,845 posts)Not to the extent that fundamentalists of other religions would be. Americans in general aren't that organized. I'm sure there would be spitting and threats but not riots.
The OP may be trying to test the waters of false equivalency. We sometimes express solidarity for the Islamic world in general but are tentative about calling them out when they behave abominably except in truly outrageous situations like stoning a woman to death or something.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)I have no intentions of defending imperialism but it is not entirely accurate to say that these Koran burning-inspired riots would NOT have happened if we were smart enough not to have armies over there.
randome
(34,845 posts)Protesting funerals in the name of Christianity is stupid.
That kind of equivalency I have no problem seeing.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)On the other hand, we weren't occupying any Muslim lands back then.
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)Next question.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Because from what I've read about Afghanistan, the Koran burning is kind of the cherry on a shit sundae we've been serving up to them for the last decade. Add in 10 years of oppressive occupation, random killings of civilians, spoliation of the land, disruption of everyday life and culture, and then this topper? Remember how discombobulated our entire country got over a couple of buildings getting knocked down and a few thousand people being killed? We still haven't recovered, and our reaction still isn't over, worse than any riots that might be occurring in Afghanistan.
If you're trying to build some kind of cultural superiority argument on behalf of the United States, you might want to start over again.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)more popular than Jesus...People were jumping up and down on cars and screaming at passer-bys. No one was killed that I recall but they were very disturbing protests..
rvt1000rr
(40 posts)how many people have been tortured, hanged, burned at the stake shot or car-bombed for angering Christians. Before you say this is ancient history, remember Northern Ireland.
tabatha
(18,795 posts)The right wing wants to nuke countries that merely have a demonstration against the US.
randome
(34,845 posts)But I still think we do a disservice to those cultures not to call them out for outrageous behavior. For instance, we need to speak out when a culture tries to suppress a minority. I think we should do the same when riots over a book occur. We may not be the avatars of civilized behavior we sometimes think we are but we can still say what we think is 'right' versus 'wrong'.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)'Onward Christian Soldiers'!
How about Iraq? The 'Crusade' started by our very religions, Christian President several years ago which took the lives of untold numbers of non-Chrisitians?
Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)No fun in that.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)That Muslim extremists are bad?
I don't think you'd get any argument about that here.
The real issue is therefore WHAT?
Issues we might agree on:
- Therefore, do not support regimes that are and export religious extremists. That should apply at LEAST as much to Saudi Arabia that gave hundreds of millions to al Qaeda before 9/11 and who the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 found gave financial support and shepherded a couple of the 9/11 hijackers up until the attacks.
- Do not use religious extremists as foreign policy proxies like we did in Afghanistan in the 80's, the Balkans in the 90's, and at least during the Bush years (and maybe still now under Obama) we did to harass Iran (using Sunni extremists to harass Shi'ite extremists).
Issues where we might disagree:
- Is it worse or any different if a fundamentalist Christian takes over a country and passes a law calling for the execution of gays as happens in fundamentalist Iran? Or if fundamentalist Jews in Israel are part of the political process even though some think the Palestinians are the people God told them to exterminate to take possession of the land of Canaan he had promised them?
- Do you think the social and political forces that are driving some Muslims to fundamentalism are the same as those driving Christians and Jews to fundamentalism as well?
- Is there a standard for appropriate and inappropriate involvement of religion in politics that you would apply equally to all religions?
- Is religion ever the excuse for political violence rather than the motive? Do you think the Catholic Spaniards and Portuguese who conquered South America and the mostly Protestant English, Dutch, and Germans who conquered North America were primarily concerned with spreading Christianity rather than getting their hands on some real estate, natural resources, and cheap to slave labor?
Even if we ultimately disagree about the issues in the second set of questions even talking about them would move the discussion from fear-mongering toward realistic solutions and policies.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)And I am NOT just talking about the most recent incident. I'm talking about the Westboro incident, too. Everyone gets mad when someone burns the Koran, they're starting violence in the Middle East, etc.
But heck, all you need to do to spark that kind of madness is to draw a cartoon criticizing Muslims. And... Salmon Rushdie, anyone?
The problem is not the burning of Korans. The problem is the jaw dropping violence that ensues any time you APPEAR to insult Islam.
How many attempts were made on Sinead "Fuck the Pope" O'Connor's life?
yurbud
(39,405 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)In response to your points, I want:
NO troops in the Middle East.* Just this last day I told someone on here that if they want to see America "intervene" in foreign rebellions (i.e., Syria), maybe they should sign up themselves and put their own skin in the game.
NO wars for oil.
Israel to recognize the state of Palestine.
Israel to address the issues behind the over 200 UN resolutions passed against Israel. (Much too broad to get into detail here.)
Total separation of church and state. (Does this answer your point #3?)
Religion has often been used as a (lame) excuse for conquest, cheap labor, theft of resources and other wealth. If I didn't oppose this I would not have signed up for this site. Also see: #2 on my list of wants.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)An admission that Muslims are more irrational and violent than Christians. That's what they usually are looking for.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Judi Lynn
(164,122 posts)and the Christian fundies went postal, wild, foaming at the mouth. And that's a far cry from burning Bibles.
These drooling, red-faced idiots swarmed, stomped, waddled, staggered into parking lots of churches, grocery stores, etc., and burned Beatles records in bonfires.
Angry reactions flared up in August 1966, after John Lennon's remark that The Beatles had become "more popular than Jesus" was quoted by the American teen magazine, Datebook. Lennon originally made the remark when an English newspaper reporter, Maureen Cleave, interviewed him at home for a series of articles on the lifestyles of the four individual Beatles. When published in the United Kingdom in March 1966, Lennon's words provoked no public reaction.
When Datebook quoted Lennon's comments five months later in August 1966, vociferous protests broke out in the southern United States. The Beatles' records were publicly burned, press conferences were cancelled and threats were made. The protest spread to other countries including Mexico, South Africa and Spain; there were anti-Beatles' demonstrations and their music was banned on radio stations. The controversy erupted on the eve of the group's US tour, and the anger and scale of the reaction led their manager, Brian Epstein, to consider cancelling the tour.
Two press conferences were held in the US, where both Epstein and then Lennon expressed their regret at words taken out of context and offence taken. Christian spokesmen pointed out that Lennon had only stated what the church was itself saying about the decline of Christianity. The US tour went ahead but there was disruption and intimidation, including picketing of concerts by the Ku Klux Klan, and at one concert the group mistakenly believed they were the target of gunfire. From the close of the 1966 tour until their break-up in 1970, they never played another commercial concert.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_popular_than_Jesus
Odd you wouldn't realize this kind of behavior has happened in the U.S. already, and with more outrageous, hideous, tragic consequences than anything you're trying to hold up as an example of Islamic inferiority to good ol' U.S. Christianity.
VioletLake
(1,408 posts)My point is that the answer to your question depends on the circumstances. For example, if Muslims in Indonesia or Nigeria publicly burned a Bible, the odds of Christians rioting would be significant.
So what's your point, that Muslims are rioting savages compared to Christians?
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)I'd imagine there would be many.
Red Mountain
(2,343 posts)Islam has not.
Islam needs one.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)it's more likely to undergo the kind of reformation protestantism itself did, from zealous newbies to mellower mainlines.
Actually, the better analogy for Islam is mainline Christians who go looking for more radical churches. Most Muslims take their religion about as seriously as most Christians take theirs.
CBHagman
(17,493 posts)...there was bloodshed galore, followed by the Thirty Years' War and sectarian violence of one kind or another for centuries.
Timeline for Britain:
http://www.britannia.com/history/reftime.html
On edit: This is not a judgment of the theology of any believer, of Catholic, Protestant, or another faith, just a reflection on how blood-stained the history of Christianity is.
renie408
(9,854 posts)If you have a point, make it.
That would be IF you have a point. If your point is that Christians are so much better than Muslims, go fuck yourself.
And yeah, I know this is going to be pulled and I really don't care.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)and it wasn't about "Christians > Muslims".
You need a chill pill.
Why do we blame people who burn the Koran for causing riots? Nobody rioted when they burned Bibles in Malawi or Cairo and we've got no invading army there bombing civilians.
Bah, I don't expect you to follow up on your drive-by childishness.
renie408
(9,854 posts)No, I didn't read post number FIFTY EIGHT. For that I apologize. See, I wouldn't have had to if you had just tried to make your point instead of being coy and patronizing about it. I found your use of the Socratic method on a message board unwieldy and annoying.
I take the 'go fuck yourself' comment back. That was uncalled for.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)mike_c
(37,051 posts)Context is everything, my friend.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Do we have troops invading there?
mike_c
(37,051 posts)Might those be two entirely separate events, with independent causes and outcomes? Why do you think the one has anything to do with the other? To suggest that they're connected or share some common explanation is just a logical fallacy.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)and imprisoning their people.
I showed you examples of where Bible-burning happens even where American troops AREN'T occupying Muslim cities and imprisoning their people.
This should be pretty easy to figure out: Bible burners are gonna burn Bibles whether American troops are there or not, and Americans didn't riot and destroy shit or go hang a bunch of Muslims in retaliation. Fact.
mike_c
(37,051 posts)First, we were talking about Quoran burning in a fundamentalist muslim nation occupied and oppressed by American troops. Now you've somehow switched to bible burning in completely different countries with completely different social dynamics and different recent histories. You've equated bible burning in Egypt with violent reactions to Quoran burning in Afghanistan. Huh? Those are independent events with completely separate causes and trajectories. Bible burning in Egypt has NOTHING to do with rioting in Afghanistan.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)I was talking about rioting about Koran-burning vs rioting about Bible-burning in general.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)And outside of a few nutbag protestors, no one gives a shit. If he was shredding Korans, some nutbag would probably
have killed him by now. There is a difference.
That is not to say that the super Christers wouldn't kill him if they could but they are held in check by our laws and our culture. Only the most extreme fundies will kill an abortion doctor or the like here.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)All religion sucks. A pox on it all. Get rid of it.
You're welcome.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)Such silly ephemera as transsubstantiation or the intercessory power of Mary? Because it was taught to them as part of their Magisteria - the extra-scriptural teachings of their churches - that these were important things.
Similarly Muslims have a magisterium that forbids casual burning of their book
http://www.daruliftaa.com/question?txt_questionid=q-08570775
Islam is 600-odd years younger than Christianity. If it takes as long for them to get over the routine killing of those who disagree (Christianity isn't entirely over it yet of course - just less routine than of yore) with odd bits of teachings like this, then we'll see an end somewhere about 2599.