Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 01:46 PM Aug 2013

Drug war not only unwinnable, also corrupting our justice system.

The NSA-DEA police state tango
This week's DEA bombshell shows us how the drug war and the terror war have poisoned our justice system

So the paranoid hippie pot dealer you knew in college was right all along: The feds really were after him. In the latest post-Snowden bombshell about the extent and consequences of government spying, we learned from Reuters reporters this week that a secret branch of the DEA called the Special Operations Division – so secret that nearly everything about it is classified, including the size of its budget and the location of its office — has been using the immense pools of data collected by the NSA, CIA, FBI and other intelligence agencies to go after American citizens for ordinary drug crimes. Law enforcement agencies, meanwhile, have been coached to conceal the existence of the program and the source of the information by creating what’s called a “parallel construction,” a fake or misleading trail of evidence. So no one in the court system – not the defendant or the defense attorney, not even the prosecutor or the judge – can ever trace the case back to its true origins.

On one hand, we all knew more revelations were coming, and the idea that the government would go after drug suspects with the same dubious extrajudicial methods used to pursue terrorism suspects is a classic and not terribly surprising example of mission creep. Both groups have been held up as bogeymen for years, in order to scare the public into accepting ever nastier and more repressive laws. This gives government officials another chance to talk to us in their stern grown-up voices about how this isn’t civics class, and sometimes they have to bend the rules to catch Really Bad People.

On the other hand, this is a genuinely sinister turn of events with a whiff of science-fiction nightmare, one that has sounded loud alarm bells for many people in the mainstream legal world. Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law professor who spent 18 years as a federal judge and cannot be accused of being a radical, told Reuters she finds the DEA story more troubling than anything in Edward Snowden’s NSA leaks. It’s the first clear evidence that the “special rules” and disregard for constitutional law that have characterized the hunt for so-called terrorists have crept into the domestic criminal justice system on a significant scale. “It sounds like they are phonying up investigations,” she said. Maybe this is how a police state comes to America: Not with a bang, but with a parallel construction.

At this point, there are a lot more questions than answers about what Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Hanni Fakhoury has dubbed the DEA’s “intelligence laundering” operation. Here are three big ones: How far does all this go? Where does it stop? And why doesn’t the general public seem to give a damn? That last question partly reflects the fact that the NSA has evidently been tracking everybody’s cell phone calls and emails, and that sounds scary. It’s easy for many middle-class Americans to convince themselves that they have nothing to fear from the DEA, even if it has morphed into a dark secret-police force we’re barely aware of. As revolutionary and noted hypocrite Thomas Jefferson once observed, the spread of tyranny only requires our silence.

Millions of people have been sent to prison on drug-war convictions over the last 20 years. Most of those people have been poor and black. We will never know how many of those cases resulted from secret evidence collected by spy agencies, but it might not be a small number. One of the Reuters articles that broke this story quotes DEA officials as saying that the “parallel construction” tactic had been used by the agency “virtually every day since the 1990s.” Legal scholar Michelle Alexander, author of the recent bestseller “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness,” sent me an email from her family vacation to say that these revelations “certainly lead one reasonably to wonder how many people — especially poor people of color, who have been the primary targets in the drug war — have been spied on by the DEA in the name of national security.”

http://www.salon.com/2013/08/10/the_nsa_dea_police_state_tango/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drug war not only unwinnable, also corrupting our justice system. (Original Post) dkf Aug 2013 OP
but it's "the law" So you have no right to criticize it on DU even if it is an abomination :-) nt msongs Aug 2013 #1
"The law is an ass." hobbit709 Aug 2013 #3
There's a lot of commerce tied up marginalizing large groups of people. DirkGently Aug 2013 #2
The Drug War is an abomination. It's perhaps one of two or three policy differences I have with millennialmax Aug 2013 #4

msongs

(74,199 posts)
1. but it's "the law" So you have no right to criticize it on DU even if it is an abomination :-) nt
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 01:53 PM
Aug 2013

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
2. There's a lot of commerce tied up marginalizing large groups of people.
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 01:58 PM
Aug 2013

Locking people up is now a private business interest. Those companies lobby against any kind of reasonable laws lowering sentencing requirements or lessening enforcement.

Spying on people in order to lock them up is perhaps even a bigger private business interest. Forbes wrote about the "security boom" or some such a while back.

It's another upward funnel of resources. We could easily spend billions less tracking, arresting, and imprisoning people. There'd be more money for the common good -- education, infrastructure, social safety nets.

But the common good doesn't stroke enough campaign checks, apparently.

I do think people are catching on and pushing back, here and there.
 

millennialmax

(331 posts)
4. The Drug War is an abomination. It's perhaps one of two or three policy differences I have with
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 01:59 PM
Aug 2013

the President and Democratic Party.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drug war not only unwinna...