General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDiFi refused to let Wyden explain his opposition to the FAA's section 702 loophole
"We've been told by Senator Feinstein's staff that under the SSCI's Committee Rule 9.3, members and staff are prohibited from discussing the markup or describing the contents of the bill until the official committee report is released. The fact that they've already put out a press release does not lift this prohibition."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130810/09240524136/jennifer-hoelzers-insiders-view-administrations-response-to-nsa-surveillance-leaks.shtml
She needs to be replaced as chair.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)That goes for most of the ranking Committee leaders.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Are you saying she is scheduled to be replaced as chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee?
How are chairs replaced?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 11, 2013, 02:04 PM - Edit history (1)
Senate Committee Chairs are rarely replaced, except by retirement, so it looks like we have DiFi for a while more.
Spank me.
dkf
(37,305 posts)deurbano
(2,986 posts)That would certainly be a great start!
And I hope you are right about DiFi retiring! She is my senator (more's the pity)... and before that, my mayor.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)She enables the worst of the abuses. God only knows what makes her tick.
dickthegrouch
(4,507 posts)Did you perhaps mean FCC, Federal Communications Commission?
dkf
(37,305 posts)The focus here is on Section 702 under the FISA Amendments Act, which is the authority that the PRISM program is under. Ever since the initial leaks, the defenders of the NSA have repeatedly stated that 702 only applies to non-US citizens who are outside the US. But as the "update" above notes, there was a change to the rules in late 2011 which allows for queries on US persons. As Senator Wyden told the Guardian, this "loophole" now directly allows "warrantless searches for the phone calls or emails of law-abiding Americans."
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130809/09444224124/loophole-shows-that-yes-nsa-has-authority-to-spy-americans-directly-contrast-with-public-statements.shtml
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)eom
dkf
(37,305 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)However, she won't make a move unless DiFi moves on.
"DiFi refused to let Wyden explain his opposition to the FAA's section 702 loophole"
...did she prohibit them from speaking or are they prohibited by law from speaking: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023444583