Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 12:52 PM Aug 2013

DiFi refused to let Wyden explain his opposition to the FAA's section 702 loophole

In fact, after the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing in which Wyden attempted to close the FAA's Section 702 loophole, which another important Techdirt post this week explains, "gives the NSA 'authority' to run searches on Americans without any kind of warrant," I -- as Wyden’s spokesperson -- was specifically barred from explaining the Senator's opposition to the legislation to the reporters. In fact, the exact response I was allowed to give reporters was:

"We've been told by Senator Feinstein's staff that under the SSCI's Committee Rule 9.3, members and staff are prohibited from discussing the markup or describing the contents of the bill until the official committee report is released. The fact that they've already put out a press release does not lift this prohibition."


http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130810/09240524136/jennifer-hoelzers-insiders-view-administrations-response-to-nsa-surveillance-leaks.shtml

She needs to be replaced as chair.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. DiFi is retiring, isn't she? She needs to be removed from her Chair.
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 12:59 PM
Aug 2013

That goes for most of the ranking Committee leaders.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
2. She was just re-elected to the Senate in 2012.
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:05 PM
Aug 2013

Are you saying she is scheduled to be replaced as chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee?

How are chairs replaced?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. My bad. There was a blip a few months ago that she wouldn't run again, but I can't find that.
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:25 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Sun Aug 11, 2013, 02:04 PM - Edit history (1)

Senate Committee Chairs are rarely replaced, except by retirement, so it looks like we have DiFi for a while more.

Spank me.

deurbano

(2,986 posts)
3. "She needs to be removed from her Chair. That goes for most of the ranking Committee leaders."
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:05 PM
Aug 2013

That would certainly be a great start!

And I hope you are right about DiFi retiring! She is my senator (more's the pity)... and before that, my mayor.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
4. She's the worst.
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:12 PM
Aug 2013

She enables the worst of the abuses. God only knows what makes her tick.


dickthegrouch

(4,507 posts)
6. What does the Federal Aviation Administration have to do with NSA?
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:40 PM
Aug 2013

Did you perhaps mean FCC, Federal Communications Commission?

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
7. FISA amendments act nka FAA.
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 01:50 PM
Aug 2013

The focus here is on Section 702 under the FISA Amendments Act, which is the authority that the PRISM program is under. Ever since the initial leaks, the defenders of the NSA have repeatedly stated that 702 only applies to non-US citizens who are outside the US. But as the "update" above notes, there was a change to the rules in late 2011 which allows for queries on US persons. As Senator Wyden told the Guardian, this "loophole" now directly allows "warrantless searches for the phone calls or emails of law-abiding Americans."

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130809/09444224124/loophole-shows-that-yes-nsa-has-authority-to-spy-americans-directly-contrast-with-public-statements.shtml

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
14. I've been hoping Barbara Lee would step up.
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 03:52 PM
Aug 2013

However, she won't make a move unless DiFi moves on.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. Wait,
Sun Aug 11, 2013, 03:22 PM
Aug 2013

"DiFi refused to let Wyden explain his opposition to the FAA's section 702 loophole"

...did she prohibit them from speaking or are they prohibited by law from speaking: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023444583

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DiFi refused to let Wyden...