General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe NSA Is Commandeering the Internet - TheAtlantic
The NSA Is Commandeering the InternetTechnology companies have to fight for their users, or they'll eventually lose them.
BRUCE SCHNEIER - TheAtlantic
AUG 12 2013, 10:05 AM ET
<snip>
It turns out that the NSA's domestic and world-wide surveillance apparatus is even more extensive than we thought. Bluntly: The government has commandeered the Internet. Most of the largest Internet companies provide information to the NSA, betraying their users. Some, as we've learned, fight and lose. Others cooperate, either out of patriotism or because they believe it's easier that way.
I have one message to the executives of those companies: fight.
Do you remember those old spy movies, when the higher ups in government decide that the mission is more important than the spy's life? It's going to be the same way with you. You might think that your friendly relationship with the government means that they're going to protect you, but they won't. The NSA doesn't care about you or your customers, and will burn you the moment it's convenient to do so.
We're already starting to see that. Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and others are pleading with the government to allow them to explain details of what information they provided in response to National Security Letters and other government demands. They've lost the trust of their customers, and explaining what they do -- and don't do -- is how to get it back. The government has refused; they don't care.
It will be the same with you. There are lots more high-tech companies who have cooperated with the government. Most of those company names are somewhere in the thousands of documents that Edward Snowden took with him, and sooner or later they'll be released to the public. The NSA probably told you that your cooperation would forever remain secret, but they're sloppy. They'll put your company name on presentations delivered to thousands of people: government employees, contractors, probably even foreign nationals. If Snowden doesn't have a copy, the next whistleblower will.
This is why you have to fight. When it becomes public that the NSA has been hoovering up all of your users' communications and personal files, what's going to save you in the eyes of those users is whether or not you fought. Fighting will cost you money in the short term, but capitulating will cost you more in the long term.
Already companies are taking their data and communications out of the US.
The extreme case of fighting is shutting down entirely. The secure e-mail service Lavabit did that last week...
<snip>
More: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/the-nsa-is-commandeering-the-internet/278572/
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)What surprises me is there are so many people in this day and age who were not aware that they are under surveillance and the Web is public domain!
lmao
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Catholic.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller (18921984)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)is strong evidence that I have committed a crime.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that speculative conjecture is not recognized as "strong evidence" since a warrant from a court has to be attained before we start listening to your phone calls and such!
We all are sitting around on pins and needles waiting for your next email or phone call to be accessed!
,,,,,, geeez
WTF. Freudian slip?
RC
(25,592 posts)E-mail, phone conversations, video conferences, HTTPS data. That "S" stands for secure, as in on-line banking.
If you think everything is public, let me catch you reading my E-mail and see how public the Internet is.
The biggest problem with Internet security, is our own government's illegal snooping.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I am amazed that there are people like you out there! Love your Tea Party tactics, everthing in your post is laced with a little hate. You may be many things ,,, but a Democrat is not one them!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)If, by chance you did knowingly respond to me, please defend your insults to me.
As for your Reply title, a dash or 3 periods would be more appropriate. "15. Like I said -" or "15. Like I said..." Four commas in a row are not used anywhere.
Education is a wonderful thing. Get some.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)when I wrote my first dissertation. But not so much for internet comment boards.... anything about my post you don't understand I will explain need be. Maybe you should defend your implied threats to me in your post.
Not meaning to insult you ,,,, just pointing out the similarity in your post and the way the Tea Party post. ,,,,you know,,, if the shoe fits
RC
(25,592 posts)The E-mail was an example used to show that at least part of the Internet is not really public, but private.
I am one of the few original, real Liberals still left around here. I am far from any Tea-party mentality.
encrypt your email example,,, it is still is still public on the web albeit in encrypted form.
As far as you being an "original , real liberal" here . You may want to be more careful of any Tea Party tactics that may have unknowing rubbed off on you. No need to make threats real or implied.
btw,,,,You implied in your post above that something bad would happen to me if you caught me reading your private emails.
RC
(25,592 posts)anyone's E-mails.
As proof, read these E-mails: readthis@timws.com
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)9R>/AL>/K#>/K#>/R1>9A:Lxy>/AL>/A#>/KA:&%>Q9:L^c>/A^>#y>Q9:+#>/K#>/KA
9T>@# Tv> 1/&?xaJ>Q# 1a/>Lx">L*M 9O>Q% 1/G:LxO>5* 9z>Q% 1aJ>LEx 1vO>&^?xaU>Lx">LxU>LxO>5* 9z>Q% 1aJ>LEx 1vO>&% 1aU>LEa>LEa>LEH>LEx Tv> J&?xaJ>LEx 1vO>#C 1/O>Lx">LEx 1a/>LxO>L*M OG:Lxv>LxO>89>#C 1/&?xaU>LxO>LEx 1vO>@% 1aU>LxO>L*x 1vO>#C 1/O>Q% 1/O>LEx 1vO>Q^?%C Ha>5* O&?x1/>LEa>LEx 1vO>&* 1/t>LE+ 1a/>5* Ha>LE8 1/t>Lxa>LEx 1vO>#% 1/t>Lx">LE% Tv>#E 1a">Lx1>Lxa>LEx 1vO>@+ 1aJ>Q% 1aU>LEH>5* OG:LEa>LEa>Lx">LEx 1/G:LxU>L*M Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx Tv>Lx1>LE* Tv>@M 1aU>Lx">LxO>LE8 1vO>@M 1aU>Lx">LxO>LE8 1/v>LEH>Q% JQ?xa/>L*M 9J>Q+ JQ?x19>Lxv>Q% 1/O>LEU>Lx1>Lxa>L*M Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx Tv>Lx1>LE* Tv>#E 1a/>LxO>LEU>LxO>LEU>Lx1>Lxa>L*M Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx Tv>@+ 1az>LEx JQ?x1O>LEx 1a2>L*M Hv>LEx JQ?x1/>LE+ 1aJ>LEx 1/2>LEa>LEx 1a2>5* O@?xvt>5* "2>8+ "t>L*M Hv>LEx JQ?x1/>LE+ 1aJ>LEx 1/2>LEa>LEx 1a2>5* O@?xvt>5* "2>GK:8x 1vO>&5?x1a>LxH>LEx 1/G:LxO>LEU>LEC J&?x1O>LEU>Lxa>LEC Tv>@% 1/t>LE+ 1aJ>5* "2>8+ "t>L*M 9T>Lxa>LxH>LEx 1/G:LxO>LEU>LEC J&?x1O>LEU>Lxa>LEC Tv>@% 1/t>LE+ 1aJ>5* "2>GK:8x 1vO>&5?x1a>LxH>LEx 1/G:LxO>LEU>LEC J&?x1O>LEU>Lxa>LEC Tv>@% 1/t>LE+ 1aJ>5* "2>GL?8x 1vO>@# J&?x1O>LEx Tv>@c 1a2>LE+ 1aU>LxO>LxO>LEx 1a2>5* 1/t>Lxa>5* Oz>LEx 1aJ>LEU>LxO>L*M Oz>LEx 1aJ>LEU>LxO>LxO>LEx 1a2>5* 9a>Lx">Lx1>LE+ 1vO>#* 1a/>Q+ 1a/>LEU>LxH>LEx 1a2>5* Oz>LEx 1aT>Lx">LEx 1a/>LxU>5* 9a>Lx">Lx1>LE+ 1vO>&5?x1a>LEU>LxO>LEU>Q% 1/O>LEx 1a2>L*M Ha>Q% 1/G:LxU>LEx 1a2>L*M Hv>Q% 1aU>LxU>LEx 1a2>L*M Ub>8H>5* HJ>LEx J&?x1">5* Ha>LEU>Lxa>5* Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx 1vO>G5?8H>5* HJ>LEx J&?x1">5* Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx Tv>#* 1a/>Q+ 1a/>LEU>LxH>LEx 1a2>L*M Ub>8H>5* HJ>LEx J&?x1">5* Ha>LEU>Lxa>5* Hv>LEx JQ?xa/>LEU>LxH>LEx 1a2>L*M Oz>LEx 1aJ>LEU>LxO>LxO>LEx 1a2>L*M HT> Ha>@# Tv>@# J&?x1O>LEx 1vO>#C 9z>#E Oz>L*M Hv>LEx 1/G:LxO>Lx1>Lx">LEx 1a2>L*M Oz>LEU>LEx 1a2>L*M Oz>LEx JQ?xa/>LxU>LEx 1a2>L*M OG:LEC 1a/>5* J&?x1O>5* Oz>LEx J&?x1O>LE8 1vO>@+ 1v2>Lxv>LEx 1az>LEH>LEx 1a2>L*M Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx Tv>@# 1/&?xa/>LxU>5* Ha>Q% 1aU>LEa>5* 1/O>Lx1>L*M Oz>Lx9>LEx 1/G:5* Hv>LEx 1aJ>LEU>Lxa>LEa>LEx 1/">L*M 9O>Q% 1/G:LxO>5* Hv>LEx 1aJ>LEU>Lxa>LEa>LEx 1/">5* HT>LEx 1/2>LxO>5* "2>5c "t>L*M Oz>Lx9>LEx 1/G:5* Ha>Q% 1aU>LEa>L*M Oz>Lx9>LEx 1/G:5* Ha>Q% 1aU>LEa>5* O@?xvt>5* 9O>Lx1>LEa>LEC 1a/>L*M 9T>Lxa>5* 9/>Lx1>Lx1>LEa>5* HT>LxO>Q% 1/2>LEa>LEU>Lxa>LEC 1vO>#U>Lxv>5* 9a>Lx1>Lx">5* HT> Ha>@# 1vO>&% 1aU>Lxa>LEU>LxU>LxO>LEx 1/">L*M Ha>LEx 1/">Lxv>LEx 1/O>Lx9>Q% 1az>5* Oz>Q% 1/O>LEx 1vO>#E 1a/>Lx">Lxv>LEx 1/O>Lx9>Q% 1az>L*M 9v>Lx1>LE+ 1a/>5* Oz>Lx1>Lxa>Q%
RC
(25,592 posts)That was the invite. BTY, the E-mails at that address are not encrypted, either. Should be easy for you.
But anyway, I can do as you did. Yours seem to have a pattern to it.
¬W¬G¨Zâ¾Ff"|ÁÂ4-rFïlÝÑ/âþë¡-Ü$ïçÓ°Z¹2NP¾×ð÷l*nC¡ÛЪ·â÷Áë´cb
gjkÒÕÜ~Äsk~jèÕÔÐùÛ0!í1¾ ¹ôî!b$¯·Q®Èà²Þ\ká~+cÏGQ#°¡`=¾¡Ädq÷n8ú?IiD[aBD|`ùâA·cP[61O&: Ä,@+ø½ncW!×v¡¬UÕ{ÖɱW÷¹ ½do
ÜRÖ»%dS_ÁhA!_°Ç&ò,¡ÍȬ¥l÷8ÖÚMÍd°Ä0ì«ã²_lµ [y'év@®}7QïnMgÌKE3ý1gæÍ*N/Kº¡íXë
þ|[f
veUô×þ aÅÞçßÄI·C 0¡Àkíx¤qx¡ªÉÍ"5¸ø·ñÓV=Ëfÿ»kçÇx®ÊSÁdÑcN]:^\»V ÙGcÚß#1;L½^¢Ièºóʧ
X¹£E êTvÓÁüh¨þ@4êðî¿PQàü[×G¦É~%d¤ä¤M:++³óZE>Ç×W; ëäë-¾§ÿ¤B/êÝ©¯
¢Ñìsº¾»ü5XA0!sÊþ»T¯§i4´A¤1ÒàÂüX'ª¡æãÊíiÜÈ8² ÖâÝtC©y%zÛtð7Wþ iîo«âügÀVL÷Q!éû+?ÅñG;äÄ\½-î¨~:ë\eºK¬Cø¬TtÆAwòyÀn´1½+ÛAËâ2éÇgÀç*륪ßkBèi
ÄíKö",2YDÂ(ÕIQX÷8Epa:ùrÏt2¾*ïcäP¡ÜB£ êI%E¨7À|ñYWümºì;ó¹+[ª#Ì ÁñÀòq!eRñh´Ì9ÂAjÏxÈ)o+}µõ½þÜRÄ7x¬
:ßð¨ï1¡<r¹`Çjlñ6Oµ©U*2ÊîÀj"¬[äàÆÓȤú\{ åÑ8¸5_]ÈÏ\4)d´E7
g>b}¯U^XÚPßjæKqXì8àîG3ïU<ñBcìÞ 0t"Næðî©dÿì^¾bËm{^ТÎZ7.»éÃohjê æxÅ7(5aÉcÈÅ-;KÆ
pØUG{áÒ(ݺäY`îz¬Îfè`lK&ú»Úx.áZ¸;B B{¸º¹*"ûáû¤þsb<ù¢ù[5×´Y¢Jñ#Hl¬-çbt¬mfÙ0,]ÔKú±Ék_¯Ó/|gOW>6@2BÛdÿtë^ãC?!¶¨ñC½ûBºº¯AJFXG+r;AØdøæ ¶("tÑ<¦Ø?'np>6Õ¡ìs,Ð+ ¯±ºOÛ®NèOç«kûdqj}é_$îÉyKx@ø¼whoötº³eWF¥C'5« Ñ{Rekbaıi¹ ɤðv²I@5Ç1?cÐX¨Fù ·Ç\JczfXqÍãjQ¼4þbù5#áÚ´Ì¡¼±a²=½X¦A_-]$w8©íÆiJ""¼Ië{è¡Êox@8¢6(/î&ÏÕU{ÿpÝOjn]Áì)Üê"èXáíëf #^e¢W ¶v°0â]=ïC»Ç®3QÿÄjØÇ¿ÿ]8.#u:¬èrØê©GD
(Childish, I know, but I'm having fun.)
I didn't go to your site,,,, but I did send you an email you may send one to me it you like . ,,
Yes exchanging chicken scratching is childish fun. I sure you are as interest in mine as I am yours. Want to swap Keys?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)More reasonable folks get concerned and educate themselves to challenge the totalitarians in gov.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)we still are waiting on that documented evidence of illegality.,,,,,,but alas nobody has produced anything but speculative conjecture. Strange that the Tea Party has the same problem producing their evidence !
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Say the same thing, even when you point them to the documented evidence.
Think about it...
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)they have no evidence to support their claims , yes indeed it is the same. the difference between fact and speculation is not in eye of the beholder.......
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)on? Just accept it because the way it has been is the way it will always be" they imply. You people are like an apathy generating machine. The NSA and authoritarians in general love you people.
I do not.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the right to not like it and try to change it,, but not in making claims of illegality without producing any evidence to support your claims! Have you ever noticed that all of the Tea Party claims are never supported with any evidence just speculation and conjecture? Funny how peas in a pod stick together!
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)rest assured I am working on changing it.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that it is illegal or unconstitutional. What changes do you want to make.?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 13, 2013, 12:41 PM - Edit history (1)
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Snowden & Greenwald proved right once again
to the deep embarrassment of those attacking him.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)It's just like with napsters the technology is out there. Since when has the Government let go of a new toy? Even if they came out with a statement saying they have stopped spying on us, it would be a lie. Thanks to computers, they can literally see into our living rooms. How do you put that Genie back in the bottle?
zeemike
(18,998 posts)As long as you keep your mouth shut and do what you are told...
But step out of line and that granny porn will be probable cause for them to break down your door in the middle of the night and take you down...and they have peeps that just love to do that.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Tranny porn
Granny porn is for the real sickos
lol
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Oh, right, "The Mentalist"
Amonester
(11,541 posts)I come to DU when I need a good laugh nowadays.
Thanks for the LOLs.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Don't be naive.
Response to WillyT (Original post)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
olddots
(10,237 posts)niyad
(118,241 posts)NightWatcher
(39,353 posts)Cant argue with that.
No one's reading your emails or tracking your google searches, you're way too boring and they've got a job to do.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)It is a mark of the stupidity of these CEOs that they have to be told this sort of thing, that screwing the customers is bad for business.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)No good act goes unpunished when evil rules: The ONE and ONLY Telcom executive to oppose the illegal surveillance got railroaded on insider trading -- the very same law that all the Wall Street insiders and their toadies on Capitol Hill somehow circumvent. What a coincidence!
Something's rotten in Denmark and Washington.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Look at all the snoopers going off script...all because they cannot keep the same story going. Got to keep the MIC and Wall Street fed at all costs doncha know!?!