General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCheck in if you DO NOT support Rand Paul
Last edited Sat Aug 17, 2013, 02:43 PM - Edit history (2)
I don't.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Am I a supporter?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I guess to some I would be considered a supporter of Paul, but then again I don't give a damn what anybody thinks of me.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)pro-environmental protection, pro-SCHIP, pro-Union.
So Rand Paul can kiss my liberal ass.
GentryDixon
(3,149 posts)StopTheNeoCons
(910 posts)Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)mbperrin
(7,672 posts)Thanks
SleeplessinSoCal
(10,412 posts)tosh
(4,453 posts)reusrename
(1,716 posts)If we want medicare, social security, public education, environmental protection, SCHIP, and labor unions, then of course we must also have eternal wars on drugs and terror, together with drone strikes and permanent detention without trials. And it's all because some minds are just too small to see a world that is better than the one we are creating.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)reusrename
(1,716 posts)How unfortunate.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)reusrename
(1,716 posts)those are Rand Paul policies that directly conflict with Obama policies.
You're just kidding yourself about supporting Obama.
You don't REALLY support him.
Rockyj
(538 posts)Pro-Civil Rights too!
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)MindMover
(5,016 posts)[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6657578499/][img]
[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6657578499/]libertarianism-anarchy-for-rich-people[/url]
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Response to Doctor_J (Reply #235)
Doctor_J This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ohio Joe
(21,898 posts)He is not anti-war, he is anti-US-Troops-Involved. His isolationist policies don't allow for that... His pro-Let-Business-Do-Anything policy though, would allow business to take up the war slack and hire private armies to go take what they want with the isolationism preventing our government from stopping them.
It is similar to his supposed pro-pot views... They are not pro-legalization of pot, it is really a pro-allow-drug-companies-to-put-out-whatever-shit-they-feel-like-and-claim-anything-about-it-...-oh-and-lets-get-rid-of-the-FDA policie
Fuck the pauls.
BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)in mind.
calimary
(90,021 posts)NO government is even better. And believe me, he would not have external forces butting out of your private life, either. Remember: he's a republi-CON. The worst kind - a teabagger republi-CON. Women's rights wouldn't be any safer. He wouldn't be sympathetic to civil rights, immigration rights and reforms, consumer safety would go to hell, consumer protection would go to hell, and you think Wall Street runs amok now? Wait til somebody like the Kentucky Pipsqueak gets in and does everything he can to dismantle what meager safeguards and minimum standards and safety nets we still have left! Wait til it's someone of his mentality who's picking Supreme Court justices.
UGH!!!!! And this is the crackpot to whom Medea Benjamin hand-delivers home-made valentines? Sweet God in Heaven...
Progressive dog
(7,603 posts)but claims to be anti-war. You just might be a supporter, since you believe he is anti-war.
paleotn
(22,218 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Best I can discern, that is the basis of Ron and Rand's foreign policy.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)All of his 'stances' are tied to his racist Tea Party ideology. What do you say? Just a question. I'm anti-war, but that has nothing to do with this racist POS or his party's racist, klan based ideology.
paleotn
(22,218 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)The cat is already out of the bag.
ANY tea party member, admirer or sympathizer is a racist POS, hidden or in the open. Period.
Fearless
(18,458 posts)Heard. Loud and clear.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)but almost all of the people who appose the NSA, drone strikes, Larry Summers, etc are staunch liberals, not Paulites.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)HoneychildMooseMoss
(251 posts)Too many people here seem to take the stance that "the Pauls don't like surveillance of ordinary citizens, ergo, if you don't like surveillance of ordinary citizens, you're a 'paulbot' or a 'paulite'" or whatever, ad nauseum. But when one mentions that nearly the entire Bush cabal supports this crap, they seem to turn a deaf ear.
I have always voted for the most liberal candidate in every election since 1980. And all this surveillance really bugs me. Politics makes strange bedfellows sometimes. This is one of those times.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)nt
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)On the political spectrum there are 2 axis which intersect.
X axis: Libertarian to Authoritarian and
Y axis: Left to Right

Gandhi and Nelson Mandela fall to the Libertarian Left (or liberal libertarianism)

I fall in between Gandhi and Mandela and I am perfectly happy there, thanks.
Edited to add linky: http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)You're entitled to your opinion as long as you don't run afowl of the admins.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)I always appreciate a relative newb 'splainin' "IT" to me.
Tell me, oh knower of things, what else should I be aware of?
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)But I WAS right. The admins don't 86 you unless you become a problem for them.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)Am I getting close?
Or maybe

East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)I've been posting on political discussion forums since the mid 90s.
Oh stop it, please, you're embarrassing me.
SamKnause
(14,896 posts)I agree with Ron Paul on the following;
anti warmongering and empire building
closing military bases
ending the war on drugs
getting rid of the Patriot Act and the spy complex
I disagree with Ron Paul on the following because I am;
pro union
pro equality
pro minimum wage and equal pay for women
pro marriage equality
pro Social Security
pro Medicaid and Medicare
pro corporate tax increases
pro closing corporate tax loopholes
pro stopping subsidies for big energy
pro strict regulation for corporations
pro public schools
pro choice and easily available birth control
pro health care for all
pro unemployment
pro food stamps
pro ending Citizens United
pro voting rights
Does this qualify me as a Ron Paul supporter ?????
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)but won't stop them from calling you a Paulite.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)I hope there wasn't a family emergency or something?
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)but thanks for asking.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)o my.
I couldn't read past that one.
You mean the kind of equality of: Everyone for Him/Herself kind? Where no civil rights exist and if a business wants to exclude black people from their premises, then that's just fine... that kind of equality?
puke bucket, come here.
You misread, or did not understand my post.
Please reread.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)That is okay.
Happens to the best of us.
FarPoint
(14,765 posts)burnodo
(2,017 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)I see people evplaining that they DO NOT support Rand and Ron Paul.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)burnodo
(2,017 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)don't be shy!
burnodo
(2,017 posts)explanation enough!
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)My point is still the same. Very few Paul supporters on DU.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Your original thread was titled "check in if you support RON Paul" and your immediate response to your own headline was "I don't" Then you completely changed the thread by replacing "support Ron Paul" to "DO NOT support Rand Paul". As you can see, the meaning changed completely.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)Have it your way.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)You know, edits are easily researched.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)This post has been edited 3 times. Show all
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 02:34 PM - Original version with no edits. (Hide)
Original version with no edits.
0. Check in if you support Ron Paul
I don't.
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 02:34 PM - Unexplained edit. (Hide)
Unexplained edit.
0. Check in if you support Rand Paul
I don't.
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 02:43 PM - Unexplained edit. (Hide)
Unexplained edit.
0. Check in if you DO NOT support Rand Paul
I don't.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)I killed em all and I enjoyed it ha ha!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...and then go back later and change the premise for which you asked people to "check in".
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)But I changed it early on, and not for malicious reasons. I was being accused of posting a flamebate OP and changed it for that reason. No one was tricked into saying something they didn't intend to say.
merrily
(45,251 posts)On the flip side, posting that you do not support Rand or Ron Paul is not going to convince anyone who suspects you of being a Paulite that you are not a Paulite.
Sorry, dude, this is a pointless exercise.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)I'm already sick of this thread.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)for that bigoted selfish fuck.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)I'm not seeing that.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)people getting accused of supporting him because they happen to be against the current use of drones. I have not actually seen a single post of someone saying they are a Paul supporter.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)but we know there are ways...
just as I thought.,,
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)
G_j
(40,569 posts)gives them away every time..
Whisp
(24,096 posts)can you support killing thousands of people, some young children? That's sick.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)wow, I thought I was working for good and here I was evil...
Thanks for that info!!
I'm anti-war and anti-drone so I am a Paulbot.
You, who supports President Obama, must be pro war and pro droning children.
Do you see how this works?
I see how you work.
disidoro01
(302 posts)You can't even deny who you are and the platform you support.
I am anti-drone and anti-war. I'll take the arrows of being called a Paulbot. You?
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)Reflection like that is a tactic of propaganda. There's been a shitload of propaganda suggesting that if one is opposed to "Total Information Awareness" programs, then one supports Ron/Rand Paul.
Go figure.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Anyone who agrees with Ron Paul on anything is a Ron Paul lover.
That must mean that you diametrically oppose all of Ron Paul's viewpoints. Ergo, you are fan of drones.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)do you yourself hold up to your own standards?
Quantess
(27,630 posts)You are not a Ron Paul lover, which, by your own definition, means that you are opposed to everything the man believes in, with every fiber of your being.
Or, have I misunderstood your definition of a Ron Paul fan? Because to me, it sounds like you are saying that agreeing with anything Ron Paul believes = Ron Paul lover.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)did Bush do anything right that people here were defending him, because he was right on one thing, or two or 3 but overall was still a mass murdering imbecile?
I don't recall that to the extent that Ron Paul and his spawn and his evil mind are defended here now. I don't care if he is right about one thing, or two or 3 like maybe Bush might have been, Ron Paul is a bigoted, sexist corporate, racist fucking pig that deserves no respect or defense.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)#2 your response was a non-sequitur. Kind of evasive, too.
But if you would like to let it go, I'm more than willing to do so. Just, please know that people are getting really fed up with being called Paulites or libertarians just for defending Snowden's actions, or being appalled by the NSA's overreach, or applauding Glenn Greenwald, or being cynical of the government's spying on regular citizens.
I'm not a fucking libertarian!!!
That's all I really wanted to say.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)They have nothing to support their positions so they need to constantly make shit up in a lame attempt to counter the factual arguments of FDR Democrats, who they regard as radical leftists and use the Paul thing as "Name Calling Propaganda" in order to make themselves feel better about their complete lack of substance.
IOW, all their talking points are just a bunch of stupid, baseless, defensive, reactionary bullshit.
I had to put them all on ignore because I couldn't handle their disingenuous, childish, little fabricated name calling games anymore. Now I no longer waste my time facepalming in disbelief at the utterly senseless juvenile absurdities being posted here on a daily basis nowadays.
There's enough factless, disingenuous bullshit to deal with from conservatives in real life, I certainly don't want to wade through any of it here on this what has become a quasi-progressive website as well.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 17, 2013, 03:29 PM - Edit history (1)
but I don't agree with him on many other things and I think Rand is more of a crass opportunist than an ideologue like his father
olddots
(10,237 posts)just like his daddy ,they have those dreamy beady eyes and Randy's wavy hair is so hot !!!!!!!!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I find him to be a little man who thinks he is something, He is nothing to write home about.
DinahMoeHum
(23,607 posts)So is his dad.
appleannie1
(5,457 posts)Initech
(108,783 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Libertarian buddies and has not found out most in the USA does not like him or his platform. His friends and supporters needs to return to the libertarian sites to echo themselves.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Just because he happens to be right about a couple of things doesn't make him less so.
DonCoquixote
(13,960 posts)Just because he is right on war does not mean I want that man anywhere near government, because he will declare war on whatever parts of it serve us.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)bluedigger
(17,437 posts)irisblue
(37,512 posts)geez.....a cut rate dynasty in the making.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)Get the litmus paper gang, it's time to find out what color you really are.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)for apposing what is happening at the NSA.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)the people who throw labels like that around don't really give a shit about reality. They know damn well no one here is really a "Paulbot" but they'll use any slur they can to avoid the ugly truth about the NSA.
OnionPatch
(6,328 posts)As being spied on by the government.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)But I don't knee jerk when it seems the LP agrees with me on social and civil rights issues, especially when a socialist with civil libertarian leanings tends to fall in the same category.
Maybe we wouldn't have to find ourselves in the Rand Paul camp if an actual Democrat would be the one filibustering civil liberties violations.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Now that the fundamentals of your original post have changed it's not a bullshit thread. So, now, Whatever particular point I might agree with Rand Paul on, I do not support Rand Paul is a fucking right wing republican teabagger fucked up moron
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)that is how I feel about Rand Paul
xchrom
(108,903 posts)Some of us old hippie types.
Not the other way around - the way fucked up Centrist Dems want to portray it.
The Left is & has always been anti-war, skeptical of establishment assertions, skeptical of monied interests, etc.
NightWatcher
(39,376 posts)Derp
sakabatou
(46,148 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Is that like "supporting the troops"? Or something tangible like giving him money?
Though, I appreciate his partial sanity in regards to foreign intervention and domestic spying, which is missing from many on the left.
Spirochete
(5,264 posts)Oh, that handjob. No, I don't support him. Only advantage of being poor - I don't support his teabagger ass with taxes either.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He desecrated aqua Buddha.
BootinUp
(51,323 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)I don't support crazy people.
BumRushDaShow
(169,756 posts)Fuck Ron Paul's evil spawn.
Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)Cha
(319,076 posts)oh yeah, asshat.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)They make Almond Joys and Mounds!
Viva Snowden, Greenwald, Chomsky, and Ellsberg!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)If he runs in 2016... It's politics...that's what we do.
Oh you mean vote for him? While I agree with him 15% of the time, even less than his father...that does not mean I will vote for him.
This is an alien concept to some here.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)alfredo
(60,301 posts)LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)and Fuck Ron Paul too.
Nine
(1,741 posts)I don't either.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)I know he tries to be both a Libertarian & a Republican but he is registered Republican. Screw him, he's a nut anyway! So is his father!
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)DU = full of fudr no doubt
leftstreet
(40,680 posts)I haven't seen DUers 'supporting' either of the Pauls
It's the GOPers who need to worry about Rand Paul, not the Democrats
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)It's up front, simple.
Rand Paul would easily get a lot of twenty-thirty somthing votes over his faux anti-war and anti-NSA stance.
The vote breakdown in the primaries for Ron Paul was pretty clear where their intentions and concerns for America lay.
atreides1
(16,799 posts)And all of his supposed anti-war crap is nothing more then a PR stunt to gain the support of those who are anti-war!
Those that actually believe anything that spews from his mouth, need to have their heads examined!
tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)They do have a following amongst some college students. They seem to be getting just half the story.
CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)I don't support Rand Paul.
I may agree with him on some issues. I am anti-war; more anti-war than he is. He's okay on civil liberties, at least on his opposition to the Patriot Act. He is terribly wrong on most other issues.
I FUCKING CARE MORE ABOUT ISSUES THAN I DO PARTIES AND PERSONALITIES.
Agreeing with someone on an individual issue is not the same as supporting their political agenda as a whole, or their political career aspirations.
I'll oppose anyone, regardless of party or position, who takes the wrong position on issues. I'll support the work individual politicians do to further economic and social justice, regardless of their party affiliations.
I don't support anyone based solely on party affiliation and/or speeches.
Why are you so upset about Rand Paul? Is he somehow more special than any other politician, or do you need to sort politicians into "us" and "them" to feel secure? Is there no flexibility, or nuance, in your political ideology?
Has there been some sort of campaign on DU to support Rand Paul?
ruffburr
(1,190 posts)hate and his only reason he is against war ( As I am) is he wants to keep that money for his pockets and those "others" of his ilk. Definitely NOT any type of saviour of america.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)if they did is beyond me. Unless they were trolling.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)I agreed with his dad on some issues and I admired his willingness to consistently follow his convictions -- including those I disagree with personally. I have long felt that he is one of a very few Presidential hopefuls who might have actually tried to follow through on his promises (I once listed President Obama in this category as well).
Rand, however, seems to me to be nothing more than an opportunist riding his father's coat tails.
rurallib
(64,688 posts)who fucked up christianity.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)He gets no support from me.
demwing
(16,916 posts)FUCK RAND PAUL!

nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)although I will acknowledge that they're right twice a day.
nolabear
(43,850 posts)I have many more reasons but that's the foremost. He rouses a particularly dangerous rabble with no care for how crazy they really can get.
onethatcares
(16,992 posts)why in the world would I support that butthole?
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)Puglover
(16,380 posts)you don't support athletes foot.
frogmarch
(12,251 posts)HiPointDem posted an article recently that speaks for me: It's Hip! It's Cool! It's Libertarianism!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021055465
freshwest
(53,661 posts)SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)Brilliant piece. Thanks for the link.
The Pauls want servility to the 1%--they think only the 1% should be running things.
walkerbait41
(302 posts)Peacetrain
(24,288 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)
jwirr
(39,215 posts)NoPasaran
(17,317 posts)MoonRiver
(36,975 posts)For the record, I do NOT support that POS.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)AlinPA
(15,071 posts)RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)a few coincidental agreeable stances notwithstanding
kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)He is a hitler clone incarnate. Greg Stilson from Dead Zone like. This is the guy who would round up dissenters. Dangerous evil bigoted man who is scary. So no I would not vote for him under any circumstances.
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)And Rand Paul is more a Religious nut so you have insane Religious Right Wing merged with the libertarian extremist stances on economics and gun policy as well as good old conservative approval of social and economic inequality.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Hard to trust a pirate! I keeeeed.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)My plan all along...
Rex
(65,616 posts)MFrohike
(1,980 posts)It takes a heroic lack of self-awareness to be a member of a government-protected monopoly who spends his time whining about government "distortions" in the market.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1awake
(1,494 posts)WAIT!! I thought you were asking who wanted brownies. NVM.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)And Rand Paul does nothing for my funny bone.
--imm
MisterP
(23,730 posts)(whether from a George-Burns-esque scamgoblin whose friends are all Nazis, or a NSA/Wall Street flack whose friends are all drones, in one way or another)
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)and that's OK.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Even the authoritarians should be able to get it.
MarianJack
(10,237 posts)PEACE!
relayerbob
(7,428 posts)Even a broken, obsolete windup clock is right twice a day.
B - The best thing that can happen to us is Assange supporting Paul. That is NOT something his righty friends will appreciate, and it will end up used against him. ARS showed that Snowden is Libertarian too (side note, I've always found that to be an odd way to spell "Anarchist"
so maybe he'll throw his support to Paul and guarantee that he doesn't win a single GOP primary.
Deep13
(39,157 posts)I don't mean on just the odd issue,but as a candidate?
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Is that checked in enough?
JEB
(4,748 posts)is like supporting syphilis and gonorrhea.
Rebellious Republican
(5,029 posts)Go to FR and ask who does not support Elizabeth Warren!!!! What some people will do to get attention here.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)I only supported him while he regained his balance. Does that make me a Libertarian?
Damnit! I knew I would catch something if I didn't wash my hands right away!
proReality
(1,628 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)quakerboy
(14,868 posts)He doesn't figure in my life.
I support a deconstruction of the everlasting war machine.
I support dismantling the domestic spying structure
I support strong protections for whistle blowers
I support upgrading our public schools.
I support the FDA, and increasing its ability to effectively police our food supply
I support the full legalization of Marijuana
I support Medicare, medicaid, and Social security.
I support the 4th amendment.
I support the 1st amendment.
I support a woman's right to choose.
I even support the 2nd amendment.
Tikki
(15,140 posts)Neither him or his flying bat father.
The Tikkis
COORACPRO
(15 posts)Fuck him and the horse he rode in on!
devils chaplain
(602 posts)defacto7
(14,162 posts)I stay as far from RP as possible.
Mira
(22,685 posts)disrespect intended. But is this a trick request?
SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)or just the next shiny stone to mesmerize the simian base.
I wish Hillary would get off the fence and toss her Jaquelin Kennedy Onassis hat in the ring.
Ah,savor the sweet sounds of the implosions inside the vacuous skull cavities of the religious right,reminds me of champagne corks popping!
Let's Party!
B Calm
(28,762 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,752 posts)ESPECIALLY lying hypocrites like the Pauls.
Kablooie
(19,107 posts)You may agree with some of his ideas without supporting him.
It would be a disaster for the world if he won the presidency.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)He is against anything which might cause wealthy people to have to pay something like their fair share of taxes. His efforts at self-promotion always fall into those two categories. He is a fairly charismatic public speaker, but he often misspeaks when he wanders into areas where he was not sufficiently briefed by the Heritage Foundation.
quaker bill
(8,264 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Calling people Ron Paul fans, Ron Paulites, Ron Paul lovers, libertarians, etc is an attempt to ridicule those of us who think the NSA is overreaching.
Say something supportive about Ed Snowden, and prepare to be called a Ron Paul worshipper. Think Glenn Greenwald makes some valid points? Bullies here call that being a "Paulite".
The thread is here because people are sick of being insulted, sick of being called Paulites or libertarians, just because we're not delighted with the NSA's behavior.
Pakid
(478 posts)and that is on a good day
JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)And he pals around with terrorist KKK types. Blowing up churches that kill four little girls qualifies as terrorism against black Americans. His buddy boy there is a KKKer and he is a KKKer apologist.
So he's irrelevant unless he runs in 2016 - and that should awaken the giant sleeping beast that is racial minority America.
He can go scratch.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)marble falls
(71,926 posts)malthaussen
(18,567 posts)... and other things I don't agree with. Mostly the latter.
-- Mal
OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)I'm a Democrat.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)radiclib
(1,811 posts)I don't support half of what Our President does either.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)But we're neck-deep in trolls, so I guess it bears asking.
No.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)On other issues he ranges from just wrong to just silly.
47of74
(18,470 posts)And that ferret on his head too.
Hayabusa
(2,149 posts)Response to East Coast Pirate (Original post)
guyton This message was self-deleted by its author.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)is a racist POS. How's that!
AllyCat
(18,842 posts)I do not support him.
kentuck
(115,406 posts)...it should be a given. No one on DU should entertain such a thought.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)Even in areas where we agree, his reasons are so f$#cked up that I still utterly despise him.
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)Wanna try out Planet of the Apes? Vote Libertarian. Libertarianism's only end is survival of the fittest. There would be no government to protect the weak. Think it's bad now? Vote for a Paul.
As a Prosecutor, Defense atty and Judge of a little over 25 years, I've seen them all. I represented one particularly heinous individual (serial killer) whose neighbors thought he was THE nicest guy for all the nice and wonderful things he did for them. And he did do some really wonderful things. He just also happened to kill people. Just because you like some of Libertarian's stances does not cover for th horror that would be ushered in if they ever got control of ANYTHING. Think TeaBags filled with steroids. This isn't a buffet. You can't pick some policies and say "oh I love him!" You have to look at the entire body of work. And the body of work for Libertarinaism, and the Paul's specifically, is a dark nightmare.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)They are both tools for the corporations.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)And fuck his idol Ayn Rand.
dorksied
(348 posts)It is hard to be friends with someone who has no social conscience and believes that taxes are theft.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)I despise him, and I would do anything to prevent him from obtaining any further power in our country.
When Rand Paul agrees with ME and can help me actually implement things in this country that I want to see happen, I will accept his help on that matter.
I will work very hard against 95% of the things that Rand Paul wants to see happen (probably 100% on economic issues).
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)Some here mistake ( or call it what it is...conflate) agreement on one issue with endorsement of the whole package.
Now I am a pleaser and want to these guys them happy but I don't know where Rand stands on Boxers vs. Briefs. I really don't want to wear the wrong underwear lest I inadvertantly support the election of that libertarian bastard!
LoisB
(13,028 posts)world wide wally
(21,836 posts)about some guys named Bernie Sanders or Alan Grayson.
Get off the Rand Paul crap already!
mick063
(2,424 posts)Repackaged ideas that have been around for decades except he is taking a "peacenik" approach.
Basically fascism without a military branch. What an absurd idea. A political structure doomed because of the failed notion that you can oppress people without force to back it up. If you are going the Fascist route, you better have the domestic military infrastructure to back it up. Check on the current Democratic leadership to see how this is properly done.
paleotn
(22,218 posts).....the vast majority of his ideas are unrealistic and down right nutty. I suppose that simply applies to ALL Libertarians. Sometimes I just want to shake them and yell, "Grow the F up!!"
Autumn
(48,962 posts)Fuck Ron Paul. And I say fuck his little boy too. I also say fuck the NSA and their little toys.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)and I don't like people who do, including the Snowdenites !
polichick
(37,626 posts)for the nomination of that nutbag party.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)though I honestly have always appreciated Ron Paul's advocacy for legalizing
pot & ending the absurd War on Drugs.
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)I find him creepy and racist and dopey and inconsistent.
Yet, just like every other broken clock on the planet, he is bound to be right every once in a while.
I DO NOT believe that agreeing with someone when they are right is the same thing as "supporting" that person.
Just like... I DO support President Obama.
And he is wrong sometimes.
On some very important things.
I can heartily disagree with him on the things that I believe him to be wrong about, and yet still "support" him.
It amazes me... simply amazes me, how many people around here do not understand this simple concept...
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but on some issues I agree with his public stances. I'm not a black-and-white, either-or kind of person.