General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNSA “Nothing To See Here, People” Types Thoroughly Embarrassed Again - WashingtonMonthly
NSA Nothing to see here, people types thoroughly embarrassed againBy Samuel Knight - WashingtonMonthly
August 17, 2013 3:18 PM
<snip>
Remember when Jeffrey Toobin ho-hummed over Edward Snowdens disclosures, and called him a grandiose narcissist?
What utter nonsense transparent discourse policing. As if a cable news pundit calling anyone a narcissist wasnt absurd enough, Toobin seems to think that the state of democracy is fine devoid of some pretty significant information. That the mere knowledge of secret surveillance programs, secret courts, secret legal interpretations, and secret legal opinions (even ones that reportedly find the NSA to be engaged in unconstitutional behavior) should be enough for Americans one neednt know the details. Nothing to see here, people. The problem with this painfully incurious and profoundly anti-journalistic outlook is that one cannot actually attempt to hold the government - or any self-interested defensive institution - accountable without information. As either a constituent, a journalist, or any other stakeholder, try grilling an official about suspected government practices without any actual knowledge or evidence. See how that goes.
Fortunately, common sense is winning. There definitely isnt nothing to see here. Just as public opinion on the war in Afghanistan soured not long after WikiLeaks Afghan War Logs and the late great Michael Hastings profile of Gen. McChrystal were published in the summer of 2010, public opinion is turning against this dragnet surveillance, which our leaders see as an indispensable component of an eternal war. The results of a Washington Post-ABC News poll published yesterday found that almost 6 in 10 respondents Democrats and Republicans alike believe the government cant justify its privacy intrusions. A few weeks after Snowdens first disclosure, a separate inquiry by the news organizations found that concerns for privacy were at the highest point in any Post-ABC News poll dating back to summer 2002. Its little wonder this is the case, given the Obama administrations crackdown on whistleblowers, Holder v. Humanitarian Law, the case against WikiLeaks, and the feds reaction to the Occupy Movement (to say nothing of all the imagined persecutions of the Tea Party).
And earlier today, Virginia Republican and NSA critic Morgan Griffith said a recent House vote to starve funding for the agencys fishing expedition surveillance would have passed instead of being narrowly defeated, had the Washington Posts most recent revelation come to light ex ante facto...
<snip>
More: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_08/nsa_nothing_to_see_here_people046440.php#
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Thanks for posting this.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Skittles
(172,172 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)while hiding behind the guise of "We support the President. Why don't you?"
Demeter
(85,373 posts)The foundation of all the rest.
Skittles
(172,172 posts)sheer hypocrisy too
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I'm tired of holding my nose to vote, if you know what I mean.
Skittles
(172,172 posts)it has been a long time
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)It's getting so you can't breathe in voting booth, the stench is so overwhelming.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)give any credibility to anything they say?
any candidate they espouse to me will go immediately to the back of the line.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)
[font size=3]Its not just for Republicans anymore![/font]
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)can join them in there!
HumansAndResources
(229 posts)I don't think the Pro Civil Liberties Leftists, who Clearly Do Not support the Koch's right to exploit us and our planet, are on their payroll. If there is a "Tea Party" in the Democratic Party, it is the Pro-Transnational-Corporate DLC.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Well put.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)Democratic Leadership Council
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Democratic_Leadership_Council
and
http://www.democrats.com/node/7789
Just Google "Koch Brothers & DLC" for enough links to choke a DC Lobbyist.
I'm surprised you didn't already know about this.
Of course, we've been telling you about this for years,
but surely NOW you believe us?
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)Here's a little challenge.
Lets see if you can repeat the following
"Koch Industries gave funding to the DLC and served on its Executive Council",
and then respond with:
[font color=firebrick]"doesn't looks like the DLC is funded by the kochs though"[/font]
Please do that again for us.
Documentation:
http://americablog.com/2010/08/koch-industries-gave-funding-to-the-dlc-and-served-on-its-executive-council.html
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)And for $25,000, 28 giant companies found their way onto the DLCs executive council, including Aetna, AT&T;, American Airlines, AIG, BellSouth, Chevron, DuPont, Enron, IBM, Merck and Company, Microsoft, Philip Morris, Texaco, and Verizon Communications. Few, if any, of these corporations would be seen as leaning Democratic, of course, but here and there are some real surprises. One member of the DLCs executive council is none other than Koch Industries, the privately held, Kansas-based oil company whose namesake family members are avatars of the far right, having helped to found archconservative institutions like the Cato Institute and Citizens for a Sound Economy. Not only that, but two Koch executives, Richard Fink and Robert P. Hall III, are listed as members of the board of trustees and the event committee, respectivelymeaning that they gave significantly more than $25,000.
The DLC board of trustees is an elite body whose membership is reserved for major donors, and many of the trustees are financial wheeler-dealers who run investment companies and capital management firmsthough senior executives from a handful of corporations, such as Koch, Aetna, and Coca-Cola, are included.
http://americablog.com/2010/08/koch-industries-gave-funding-to-the-dlc-and-served-on-its-executive-council.html
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Not surprising.
You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)uponit7771
(93,532 posts)...outside of stoking.
15 amendment is being torn asunder daily by the GOP and folk are worried about what "could" be happening (cause there is no solid proof systematic spying is happening and looking at public info is NOT ... NOT spying) with the 4th ?!?!
I don't trust this shit...
A basher and a fuck up (who ran away to Russia to get away from suppression?!!?) who hired on to company for the explicit reason of stealing are telling Americans that America's government is bad...
unnn
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)may not want to own up to it but we have a two Party political system.
NSA is overseen by judges on the courts. Judges appointed by the executive branch,,,, I know which Party I want to appointing the Judges whose job it is to protect our rights and it damn sure isn't the GOP.
Thank Goodness that both Tea Parties followers are declining!
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)...now Raund Pauls are quoted here and there too.
Shit seems fishy
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)there are pretenders among us!
Hell they are now proclaim the GOP victory in 2016 here.
I put nothing past the GOP operatives
in no level too low for them to sink to!
geez
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)NealK
(7,304 posts)Irony is not dead.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Nailed it!
TBF
(36,871 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that link you gave confirms everything I said......
try reading what I said a little slower maybe that will help,,
Federal Judges are appointed by the Oval Office.
If you want the GOP appointed judges looking out for your rights ,,, keep up the Tea Party tactics.
I know I want judges who were appointed by a Democrat in the White House doing these jobs not a Judge appointed by the GOP like Roberts.........
geez........
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Maybe Willy should try that? Could it help him?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)HumansAndResources
(229 posts)He was on his way to Latin America when, oops - no passport. Russia was not his choice. Are you just misinformed?
He gave up an easy and wealthy life to Tell Us the Truth. Yet you Insult Him. Why??
Anyone who doesn't know history - that the US-Government has been a participant in war-crimes across the globe, for centuries, under both parties, has their head in the sand. Yeah, I'd call that "bad." A greater awareness of anti-liberties tactics - and these coming home to roost in the USA - is a Very Good Thing. We can END this behavior with a Real Grassroots-Run Democratic Party.
No one here promotes the GOP or Rand the Koch Brothers Tool, so you DLC guys can call off your attempted framing of the Pro-Civil-Liberties / Anti-War wing of the Democratic Left the "Enemy Within". We know who the enemy is - just follow the money.
hueymahl
(2,904 posts)Right vs. Wrong -
That is what this boils down to. There is not a whole lot of "grey" in what the NSA is doing.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)has to be a 'message' rather than simple facts, is and always has been, beyond me.
Not only that, but the Left/Right/Ron Paul/Rand Paul games they played and some of us for a while, simply aren't working anymore.
Keep the people divided, and many of us fell for it for a long time, was how they remained 'safe' from scrutiny. But some things, and this they don't seem to get, are far, far more important than political game playing.
The day the people unite on some of these issues, is the day they will lose control. And it appears, starting with the Wall St. Bailouts, that has begun to happen.
The propagandists keep trying to play the old cards that used to work 'you're a Paulbot if you oppose these programs' or 'only racists' oppose these programs, have spectacularly failed, not only that, they have become COMEDY, the worst thing that can happen to a propaganda machine.
Maybe some of them will finally start taking their jobs seriously, realizing that job is NOT to facilitate the bottom line of Corporations, but is it, and I know this is hard for them to accept:
TO DEFEND AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE US!
Sorry to shout that part, but our elected officials have gone way, way off course and someone needs to remind them why they are there. It is NOT to secure profitable jobs in the private sector for themselves and their buddies.
hueymahl
(2,904 posts)+1000
Civilization2
(649 posts)Yes the standard propagandist attacks on reality are failing the corporate-military and its deluded supporters,. finally.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)You Meanie!

n2doc
(47,953 posts)DU is pretty schizophrenic these days.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Catherina
(35,568 posts)markpkessinger
(8,927 posts)tom_kelly
(1,051 posts)is that there will be a series of bank failures again soon. Their table has already been set for the feast and nothing will cancel their plans. They understand that this will be the last shindig so they're going to go for broke. They realize the masses will rise hence the need for all this surveillance. The worldwide surveillance will be very important once other countries realize that their money has been stolen too. No bailouts this time. They will use this opportunity to install their world order. World, meet chaos.
Civilization2
(649 posts)too bad the greedy seem to get what they want,. for the short term anyhow.
<sharpens pitchfork>
<swills home-brew and packs the bong with home grown> Grid what grid?
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)Count me as a "something to be seen and has been long before Snowden's 'revelations' and as it turns out, what's happening is working well within the parameters of the Constitution (no thanks to David F. Addington et al.), but, sure, let's repeal the Patriot Act and the AUMF, too, I'm 100% behind that" person.
Kind of hard to fit that in a headline, I grant you.
AppetiteForApathy
(22 posts)Because I feel both the proponents and opponents of these programs are lying their asses off, either intentionally or unintentionally.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I REFUSE to believe ANY of it.
Its ALL hype!
Somebody is just making all this stuff to help the Republicans!!!
Our government LOVES us,
and only wants what is GOOD for us,
whether we agree or not!
Snowden is a coward and a traitor,
who really is insignificant,
and we will use all the power of the government to catch him
and make him apologize........after we punish him.
Now THAT is the END of DISCUSSION!!!!

Lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalala.
Can't hear you.
Its not real.
I REFUSE to even look at all that "evidence",
because all that "stuff" is just hype.
Lalalalalalalalalalalala
WillyT
(72,631 posts)You forgot to mention Greenwald but that's about it.
ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
where the sarcasm tag is no longer needed;
everyone gets it.
(sigh)
CC
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)if the NSA can listen in on what's being said inside that bubble.
Cone of Silence anyone?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)The 1st Amendment is getting kind of blurry when it comes to freedom of speech and the press also.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023478767
HumansAndResources
(229 posts)History is made up of conspiracies - usually to trick the poor into dying in wars for the rich. Grade School history was boring because all that was stripped out and replaced with half-truths and 'patriotic myths'.
Of course, when you consider that schools were designed to create, "A nation of workers - not thinkers" (John D. Rockefeller) per the Foundation-Heads who designed them - it is not surprising that the goal is to turn young minds off to history, which would pull the curtain back behind the system of "manufacturing consent" (Chomsky) allowing for the continuing trend of citizen-disempowerment to continue.
In our dreams...people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions [intellectual and character education] fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply.- Rockefellers General Education Board - Occasional Letter Number One (1906).
NealK
(7,304 posts)Did you know that Mr. Burns was based in part on him?
"The show's creator Matt Groening principally based Burns on his high school teacher Mr. Bailey. Drawing further inspiration from oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller, David Rockefeller and fictional character Henry Potter from It's a Wonderful Life, Groening made Burns the embodiment of corporate greed".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Burns#Creation

L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)greatly endangers American security and it is a crime. They already put in place the strongest safeguards so there is no overreach. and they were already going to fix the overreach that doesn't even exist in the first place.
Besides, the Guardian newspaper uses cookies, Snowden's girlfriend was a pole dancer and Greenwald was way behind on his taxes ten years ago.
Anyone who cannot see this supports Rand Paul.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)some awake. But, then there are those who never noticed the "boxcars" going past their houses on the way to the "Detention Centers"....i.e. "Concentration Camps" until it was too late to do anything about it.
We have a small window of time to do something. The Heathrow Fisaco with Greenwald's Partner is a Wake Up Call.... We need to heed it!
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts).
midnight
(26,624 posts)I wonder if this bipartisan group thinks this, because they know it's against the law?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)gulliver
(14,031 posts)There is still no evidence of any harm to the privacy of even a single individual. It's a tempest in a teapot, and the uproar is distracting us from real problems.