General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom Facebook - Alan Grayson: "I stand with Glenn Greenwald. Do you?"
https://www.facebook.com/alangrayson?ref=streamref: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/18/glenn-greenwald-guardian-partner-detained-heathrow
I'm sure you all know about this but wanted give some here the chance to throw Alan Grayson under the buss ...oh come one now ...we know you want to ...doncha!
Well I won't join you! You are welcome to your republiDem Stasi state modus apparatus with all its obsessive compulsive shills.
Oh yea ...YAWN ...another story from Democracy Now about the UK Stasi destroying hard drives at the Guardian.
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/8/20/uk_media_crackdown_greenwalds_partner_detained
It's the end of journalism as we have known it ...and the end of Democracy ...as we have known it. The terrorists have won. US government bows down under its own weight of fear mongering and succumbs to the destruction of Democracy's illusion. Zombie Dem voter apocalypse ensues. How to destroy a democracy in only a few short steps ...It's so easy a fundy terrorist can do it.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Hey Alan.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Grayson is wrong about GG.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)So, you struck out in five different ways.

HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)It is fucking amazing.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Indeed, fucking amazing.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Who knows, maybe Canada will be interested!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)it's distressing to actually see somebody at DU call Alan Grayson a scammer.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)I haven't got one but who knows?
Blanks
(4,835 posts)lark
(26,074 posts)Actually, there's no maybe in that, I was just being nice.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)We've all been wrong from time to time. I admire Alan enormously, but I think he's wrong on this one. GG is far more concerned about himself than the US or well, just about anything I can think of. If he truly cared about what was going on now, he'd be here, not shacked up in Brazil.
I have absolutely no respect for him whatsoever.
Response to L0oniX (Original post)
mother earth This message was self-deleted by its author.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)enough
(13,757 posts)Somebody who isn't putting re-election ahead of everything else in the universe.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)ananda
(35,118 posts)Very electable!
railsback
(1,881 posts)you get banned from those threads. You know, 'STFU, you STASI loving, Freedom hating Mao lover'.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)It's really no trouble. I'm under here already anyway.

roguevalley
(40,656 posts)this and will probably get blasted. the reagan generation members have no memory of what a real dem is really like.
RC
(25,592 posts)Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)"the UK Stasi"
"the end of journalism"
"the end of Democracy"
"the terrorists have won."
"US government bows down under its own weight of fear mongering and succumbs to the destruction of Democracy's illusion"
"Zombie Dem voter apocalypse ensues."
"How to destroy a democracy in only a few short steps"
"It's so easy a fundy terrorist can do it."
I love the smell of over-the-top, paranoid hysteria - and DU is becoming the go-to site when I need a good whiff of it.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)what would I do without the never-ending entertainment this site provides.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)I don't invite discussion thereof.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Fixed now.
lark
(26,074 posts)Wow, there are still some real Dems on this board and some really do care about privacy. Of course, there are still those who have blinders on and who really don't care about policy at all, it's just about the D.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)We thought cointelpro was bad enough but apparently that was just a learning session for the Fed. They were waiting for the chance to instigate a mass surveillance Stasi state and 911 gave them that ...a sort of disaster economics on steroids.
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)RL
Number23
(24,544 posts)word salad. I guess the OP didn't think Grayson's words were compelling enough so s/he decided to toss in some totally unrelated, completely unnecessary flamebait in to make it sexier.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)just a 'feeling, mind you - that we won't be seeing a reply to this OP saying, "I'm Alan Grayson, and I approve this message!"
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Of course, I was chastised earlier on this board by someone more servile to authority than I am. He told me I didn't belong on Democratic Underground.
Well, I suppose when those don't agree with your position, they just don't want you around anymore. Quite Stalinesque, actually.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)and simply label them as "more servile to authority than you are", and implying they are being "quite Stalinesque".
Nice to see you taking the high road here ...
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Haven't told anyone to go elsewhere, though. There's a difference.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)lark
(26,074 posts)I couldn't tell.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)They speak for themselves.
Mike Nelson
(10,943 posts)...and yes!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)After reading this I'm gonna just go jump off a bridge..
zeemike
(18,998 posts)When you hear another one is scares you.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)runnin' around in your head you need to get help. Seriously, it's a problem. Glad I could help.
Let me clear this up for you: I am but one voice.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)But I have lots of voices in my head, and it is not a problem for me...I like them there...they remind me of what is right and wrong.
Sometimes they take to song
I know it is funny
But is it all that wrong?
And this has triggered a new voice in my head....Bob Marley singing
One Love / People Get Ready
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Good tune!
No, I was being a bit of a smart ass, about the voices.
I go over things in my head all the time. I don't have too many voices going at once that could get a bit confusing.
My comment (about jumping off the bridge) was because of how 'dark doom and gloom' that part of the OP was. Again, being a bit of a smart ass.
Music is always a good option. I think music is one of the few things that can bring people together.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)But these are dark and gloomy times...some people can point it out with no fear and others can't bear to hear it...and I sympathies with both sides.
We need to hear it but it sure does suck when we do.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)that Bush was prez were dark and gloomy times. Sheesh, sounds like the classic bad opening for a bad novel. It was a dark and gloomy night. Things just aren't THAT bad.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)But things ARE that bad for some....if you have no job and are on the street it is that bad....but if you have investments that bring in millions life is good, and those on the street mean nothing to you because you never see them and have law enforcement to keep them far away where they will not trouble you.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Things are quite bad.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)to think as positively as I can. I have cancer, don't know how many years left, but I try to make the best of it. I'm currently volunteering at the local library to help adults learn to read and it's a very rewarding time for me. Of course, we could be in medieval times, that might be just a tad worse. Or be black in 1925. Or a woman - well just about any time. Yes, things could be much, much worse.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)
one_voice
(20,043 posts)are you offering?
Whisp
(24,096 posts)what lunatic wrote that shit.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)As far as I know it was the OP.
I'm not sure but I think in his reply here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3502109
after asking if I was high, he told me if jumping off the bridge failed to keep trying.
I told him I wasn't high and asked if he was offering. He never responded. Seems a shame to write something like that and not give up some smoke.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)backscatter712
(26,357 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)I mean having your every communication saved and inspected by a government agency is so freedom loving, ya knoe?
--->
for those "Liberal Democrats" with the far Right mind-set, that think toadyism totalitarianism dictatorships are a good thing.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,539 posts)Someone in Congress admitting that our Democracy is an illusion! It's not hard to figure out that unlimited campaign cash can sway a politician, or Judge, or the media. Oh wait, they own the media!
Way to go Grayson!
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)The part where is partner got detained was atrocious.
mick063
(2,424 posts)It is the magic bus!
Response to L0oniX (Original post)
Post removed
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)Oh, man, that sums them up perfectly.
"ATLP" should be our response to all their posts.
RL
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And I expect this one shall be too.
SamKnause
(14,892 posts)I stand with Glenn Greenwald.
I stand with Bradley Manning.
I stand with Julian Assange.
I stand with Wikileaks.
I stand with Alan Grayson.
I stand with all the brave leakers and whistleblowers.
I stand for freedom of the press.
I stand for separation of church and state.
I stand for truth in government.
I stand for the rights of we the people.
.........................................................
I stand against warmongering, or empire building.
I stand against the U.S. policing the world.
I stand against the corporate control of government.
I stand against the destructive and insane war against marijuana.
I stand against the militarization of the U.S. police.
I stand against Citizens United.
I stand against the Patriot Act.
I stand against free trade deals that damage the U.S. workforce and take advantage of workers in foreign countries.
rtracey
(2,062 posts)Nice that you stand for everything in the world, but as you stand by Assange, you stand by Manning too... Sorry, but Assange F'd Manning and now Manning is in for 35 and Assange is out.....
tritsofme
(19,895 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)There will be many more. Wyden has already improved his stock.
The next campaign will be about Democrats sprinting away from our President's surveillance policy. This mad evacuation will include distancing from other policy as well.
There will be folks looking around saying "Where did everyone go?" As soon as the President's term nears it's end, the fealty will begin to diminish and all that will be left will be those that typed hundreds of words to defend failure.
ForgoTheConsequence
(5,185 posts)....
SammyWinstonJack
(44,316 posts)jazzimov
(1,456 posts)or trusted him!
I don't care who supports him now, I never trusted him. He has always had a personal agenda. DESPITE his appeals.
FUCK GREENWALD!
And FUCK his hero, Rand Paul.
Swagman
(1,934 posts)we will listen and fight the attempts at suppression of speech and support those who expose government actions and you can't do a thing about it.
Fuck Snowball too.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)For the sweet, sweet tears if incoherent, impotent rage! They are so refreshing!
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)Even though he is helping to expose a terrible, over reaching, corrupt wrong in our government, that action is over shadowed by him not being a "Good DU Democrat"? Me thinks you need to rethink your priories.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)
bhikkhu
(10,789 posts)I don't wish Greenwald ill or anything, but he seems more like a tabloid writer.
Swagman
(1,934 posts)..oppose every single aspect of what followed ?
they denigrate Snowden...they claim Morales is a dramatist when his jet is side-tracked..they claim Greenwald is an 'egotist' (as is Assange)..they now denigrate Greenwald's partner he is detained..
it's always the same DUers who flatly oppose every twist and turn in this tale of the secret recording of your personal details...
there is no grey area in their thinking, no doubts that some parts may be true and some false and bad things are happening...this blanket opposition seems organised to me.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)I think really what it is ...is their failure to accept the truth about the fact that this admin has been and is still expanding what was handed to him from the repukes. IE republiDems.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...and closeted supporters of a fascist state.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm with Grayson, and wish there were a thousand more like him.
RC
(25,592 posts)If fact, half that many would be enough. Can you imagine Alan Grayson as Speaker in either or both houses?
Puglover
(16,380 posts)more like him the House of Representatives would be 3.29 times bigger.
I keed I keed. I also totally agree.
gopiscrap
(24,725 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)
- K&RHooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And Greenwald, Snowden, et al.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Cha
(318,969 posts)peas in a pod.
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)No one is immune from the under-the-bus crowd!
RL
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)....so they could find out what their opinion was.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)in Congress is duly noted, and very telling.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Michigan-Arizona
(762 posts)livingwagenow
(373 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Joined at the hip.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)These are very challenging times and it is comforting to know that there are a few representatives that disagree with the overreach of the NSA.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)It's possible to be a real human being instead of a corporate robot. Alan Grayson and Glenn Greenwald prove that.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)does.
Alan supports Glenn Greenwald. I support Glenn Greenwald!
Just like I support all labor actions, no matter how much it inconveniences me!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 21, 2013, 12:40 PM - Edit history (1)
for Democrats only to read "fuck Alan Grayson." I don't think that this is the type of discourse that most of us came here for. Alan Grayson is an articulate and fearless progressive and we need about 217 more of him in the House. Yet at this supposedly progressive site I read expletives directed at him.
RC
(25,592 posts)Except for the sign over the door, this place is turning in Conservative Central.
Make up your own facts. When it get to the point where you can't defend it any longer, say that it was just your opinion anyway, then insult the person responsible. Blue links to your past posts in support, help too.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)Also, I corrected a couple of typos.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,682 posts)Although I agree that on DU more and more of new and closeted conservative authoritarians feel braver in coming out of the woodwork...which coincides with Obama and his appointees moving more brazenly to the right and authoritarian themselves.
Its easy to give up and declare DU overrun, because even one "republiDem Stasi state" supporter causes such a jolt in here compared to the seemingly One Voice in here during the Bush years. But have heart...I am encouraged that whenever one of them tries to disrupt a thread with red herrings or unsubstantiated emotionally based personal opinions, there are many more that will reply and defend the traditional Democratic principles they seem all too willing to throw by the wayside.
RC
(25,592 posts)But they are still all over the place.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)back during the darkest days of the Bush regime. The more i see all these NSA apologists, be they on this site or MSDNC or what have you, the more i'm certain that most of the opposition and supposed "anger" at the violations committed by the Bush regime were just because he had an R next to his name. When its Team D, everything is fair game apparently. Whatever, i stand with Grayson and anybody who stands up for the universal right to privacy.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)It's time to Kucinich Grayson!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)that it could have come from Glenn himself, as new dialogue for his soap opera.
Grayson should be more specific about the issue, not talking about the reporter/editorialist and standing behind such a person. Someone in Congress should be way above that and introducing bills or something, not supporting a reporter.
And explaining why he thinks it is OK to reveal classified documents over the WPA, which was available to Eddie.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)justice and defending the constitution..
mimi85
(1,805 posts)however I think he's way off base on this one. I wish GG and friends would disappear off the board for just a couple of days. There must be something else going on to discuss.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)I say thanks to GG for breaking the story and now tune out the subsequent drama.
I have never taken GG seriously as a journalist, he writes opinion pieces. This Snowden thing is to him what Monica Lewinsky was to Drudge, a claim to fame and a way to really nail a President he's hated all along.
On the upside the citizenry has been reminded that there are things in place that can pretty much track everything you do. Good to know. So sad to see a big chunk of the few who gave it more than a passing yawn are mostly squandering time on forums like this fighting for GG's "honor" and taunting the multitudes (who I have not yet seen) that defend the NSA spying program. Oh, and accusing those who aren't willing to canonize GG of being, wait for it...homophobes.
Yep, that's what the "informed" among us are choosing to do (in large part) while the rest (the uninformed or those who don't care) just turn up their TVs and open a fresh bag of chips.
Yes, and the bourgeois are quaking in their boots.
Julie
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I also stand with the Constitution.
Manning, Snowden, Greenwald, Miranda and Grayson stand alongside us.
Of note are those who do not.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)GG started making this more about the constitution and less about him. So sad to see many who should know better helping to blur the focus of what is most important here (it ain't Greenwald).
Julie
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I've been reading his column since he was blasting Bush and Cheney, and through it all he has demonstrated a surprising consistency in his support of civil rights and freedom of the press.
The UK and US governments just used the vast powers of the state to illegally detain and make and example of Greenwald's spouse, in an attempt to intimidate the Guardian into suppressing the leaked Snowden information. I can forgive Glenn for getting a bit hot about that. Were it my spouse, I would be hopping mad. In this particular case, it is GHGQ that is making the story about Greenwald by targeting Miranda.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)However I am happy to stand with you on our common ground; that of believing our constitution is worth protecting.
Julie
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)What matters is what the information is telling us, not who is telling us the information.
Cheers!
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Under the bus with him! Getting crowded, but at least everyone under here believes in actual Democratic principles
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Oh ...uhm ...ooops
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 21, 2013, 04:03 PM - Edit history (1)
You know, I used to be able to avoid those vile, bitter, Swiftboating attacks on Liberal Democrats like those at the top of this thread by NEVER going to FreeRepublic.
Sadly, that no longer works.

brooklynite
(96,882 posts)He's spoken out against NSA abuse, but hasn't said anything about supporting what Snowden did.