Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,329 posts)
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:08 AM Dec 2011

Rush Limbaugh Picks On Poor Kids, Says They Should Starve At School

The School Meal Program feeds millions of kids every year. I should know. I was one of them. So were my two siblings. I was raised by a single mother who worked damn hard taking care of senior citizens for little pay. So little in fact, that we qualified for free or reduced breakfasts and lunches at school. I would go to school every morning, eat a good breakfast, and begin learning on a full stomach instead of an empty one. As a result, I was able to focus on my education without feeling hunger. Statistics show that kids who are hungry don’t learn as well. They have a hard time concentrating because their stomachs are screaming for food. I was lucky. I got to eat two meals a day at school, and avoided becoming just another statistic.

But according to Rush Limbaugh, I should have starved my way through school. On his radio show, Limbaugh whined about poor students being on the School Meal Program, saying that feeding them instead of letting them starve turns them into “wanton waifs and serfs dependent on the state.” That’s funny, I’m not dependent on the state. I’m not on welfare nor do I ask for state assistance. I graduated high school, went on to graduate college, and now I’m a writer and certified teacher. Because of the school meals that kept me focused on learning, I was able to succeed and find work I enjoy. But that’s not the way Rush Limbaugh sees it:

“If you feed them, if you feed the children, three square meals a day during the school year, how can you expect them to feed themselves in the summer?”

Here's the audio: http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201112120011

Read more: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/17/rush-limbaugh-picks-on-poor-kids-says-they-should-starve-at-school-audio/

Reposted since the original thread( http://www.democraticunderground.com/10145082#post14) was locked for being "off-topic" O_o ...?

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rush Limbaugh Picks On Poor Kids, Says They Should Starve At School (Original Post) Galraedia Dec 2011 OP
Limbaugh and Gingrich... U of M Dem Dec 2011 #1
Call it Hunger Games. n/t Zalatix Dec 2011 #13
Well, to be fair, they are really doing this to bring jobs back to America. gtar100 Dec 2011 #27
An obese man telling others to starve Scootaloo Dec 2011 #2
That's more true than you realize. Zalatix Dec 2011 #25
Not necessarily to starve them out of existence; more like into submission. gtar100 Dec 2011 #28
They're looking to automation for the hard and dirty work. Zalatix Dec 2011 #29
Too bad the truth is too much for so many - they're still whining "why are the Repubs NOT NICE??" saras Dec 2011 #30
You get it, clear as a bell. n/t Zalatix Dec 2011 #31
Interesting. I guess they really did codify and 'set into stone' their wishes. gtar100 Dec 2011 #33
what a ruffian, contradicting the New Testament & attacking American children, he has no manners, StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #3
The man is an uncivilized savage. n/t Zalatix Dec 2011 #14
exactly, no manners, no tact, no empathy-sociapath! StarsInHerHair Dec 2011 #15
Can't believe Obama caused Rush and Beckkk to start doing drugs again. FarLeftFist Dec 2011 #4
Did they ever stop? Initech Dec 2011 #39
I stopped paying attention to anything that bombastic ass said a long time ago. n/t totodeinhere Dec 2011 #5
remember when the right-wing used to pretend that they cared about the poor? Douglas Carpenter Dec 2011 #6
I hate when they use that phrase, becuase they use it wrong Scootaloo Dec 2011 #7
Actually, it's more like Galraedia Dec 2011 #9
A rising tide lifts boats and drowns villages. n/t Zalatix Dec 2011 #11
only song can answer a blovateur as humongous as Limbaugh..... MindMover Dec 2011 #8
fuck rush GiveMeFreedom Dec 2011 #10
I get so sick of that right wing excuse treestar Dec 2011 #12
Typical pill-popping draft-dodging RepubliOinker picking on poor children SpiralHawk Dec 2011 #16
From the looks of his jowls and fat face, he's been eating the poor children. n/t fasttense Dec 2011 #17
That pig is their canary because his "job" Riley18 Dec 2011 #18
Actually, I think Rush is behind on this. tsuki Dec 2011 #20
The School lunch act of 1946 was created due the 40% of WWII draftees rejected due to bad diet underpants Dec 2011 #19
So free and reduced lunch is a national defense Riley18 Dec 2011 #21
Exactly underpants Dec 2011 #22
No, but cotton is the reason that hemp is glowing Dec 2011 #23
whats wrong with oldhippydude Dec 2011 #24
"Picking yourself up by your own bootstraps" is a perfect analogy for republicans. gtar100 Dec 2011 #26
Not only that, the attempt will smash your face into the pavement - more fun for them. saras Dec 2011 #32
I've wondered secondvariety Dec 2011 #34
he actually believes that particular shit. he's that 'popular' because they bought him a monopoly certainot Dec 2011 #38
He's right. They should drug test children if they want pizza... err... healthy vegetables. Lost-in-FL Dec 2011 #35
and to think many of our universities keep this guy fed by broadcasting sports on his radio stations certainot Dec 2011 #36
That's what folks say about feeding wild animals. Rush must be desperate for attention. McCamy Taylor Dec 2011 #37

U of M Dem

(154 posts)
1. Limbaugh and Gingrich...
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:14 AM
Dec 2011

want to escalate poverty into an all out battle royale between school aged youth for bread crumbs and cheap electronics.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
27. Well, to be fair, they are really doing this to bring jobs back to America.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 05:09 AM
Dec 2011

Low paying sweatshop and child labor type jobs. But jobs nonetheless.

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
25. That's more true than you realize.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:25 AM
Dec 2011

The whole point of Conservatism and Republican politics is to starve the poor out of existence.

It's too awful for people to realize, but once you stop and look at what they've done, the conclusion is inescapable.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
28. Not necessarily to starve them out of existence; more like into submission.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 05:16 AM
Dec 2011

They seek out others to do the hard and dirty work. Slavery is a time-honored tradition among the elite throughout the ages. Just because it has been banned for 100+ odd years doesn't mean they've forgotten just how profitable it was for them.

Anyone willing to pay someone minimum wage would gladly pay them less.

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
29. They're looking to automation for the hard and dirty work.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 09:23 AM
Dec 2011

Go visit the Georgia Guidestone to see what they really want. It's the first thing on the Guidestone's agenda: reduce the human population to 500 million.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
30. Too bad the truth is too much for so many - they're still whining "why are the Repubs NOT NICE??"
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 10:11 AM
Dec 2011

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
33. Interesting. I guess they really did codify and 'set into stone' their wishes.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 01:00 PM
Dec 2011

Here's the complete set of guidelines engraved on the Georgia Guidestones
[font size="2" color="blue"]
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

(source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones)
[/font]
I can understand the principles all right but given the mentality of the elite, they don't have it in them to carry this out with any sense of justice. It's merely the wet dream of despots and tyrants. It begs the question, just who is it that gets to decide!

Anybody who attempted to carry out a plan to bring this into fruition would carry into their paradise with them the selfishness, greed and hubris that fuels their inspiration. They will not escape from their own hell.

Liberal/Progressive ideology provides a much more sane approach to the problems these people are attempting to address. Consider all the work we have done over the past century involving:

1. Education
2. Health care
3. Economic regulations and tax fairness.
4. Human rights.
5. Animal rights.
5. Democracy in the workplace as well as politics.
6. Environmental protections and regulations.
7. Clean alternative energy sources
etc...

The Liberal world view does hold an alternative to the masked draconian measures eluded to in this elite 'Guidestone'. The vulnerability of the liberal viewpoint, however, is that it doesn't provide quick, easy solutions and has been undermined too easily by its detractors. Case in point - Rush Limbaugh. From our perspective he's an absolute crackpot. He would be utterly marginalized by a liberal system of values as would any right-winger. Therefore, they fight against every one of these initiatives regardless of what good it would do them. And they are doing a bang-up job of making a mess of everything in the process. If they really believed in the Georgia Guidestone principles, they ought to consider well that the ends never justify the means.

StarsInHerHair

(2,125 posts)
3. what a ruffian, contradicting the New Testament & attacking American children, he has no manners,
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:18 AM
Dec 2011

is rude & declasse'. Obviously he does not know how to behave in polite society.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
6. remember when the right-wing used to pretend that they cared about the poor?
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:23 AM
Dec 2011

They simply claimed that their policies would help raise people out of poverty, "A rising tide raises all ships." Now they don't feel the need to pretend anymore.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
7. I hate when they use that phrase, becuase they use it wrong
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:27 AM
Dec 2011

After all, the tide lifts from the bottom, and the biggest boats rise last. They want to use that line? Fund the poor. That tide will lift the rich with it.

GiveMeFreedom

(976 posts)
10. fuck rush
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:46 AM
Dec 2011

Think about if this fucking idiot missed a few meals all the weight he'd loose. But of course he won't.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
12. I get so sick of that right wing excuse
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 04:48 AM
Dec 2011

That any state help will automatically make people "dependent" for life. The kid doesn't care who provides the food. Do we all become dependent for life because our parents fed us when we were kids?

Riley18

(1,127 posts)
18. That pig is their canary because his "job"
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 08:12 AM
Dec 2011

is to both make a talking point begin and also to judge wingnut support for the idea.

The simple answer to pig's question is that the schools continue to provide breakfast and lunch throughout the summer. He should be in agreement as he appears to never miss a meal himself.

I am getting concerned because children are being mentioned by Gingrich and Limbaugh. They are pushing an ideology that our children are not equal to the elites' kids. The idea that our kids can scrub toilets and scrounge for food is an outrage.




tsuki

(11,994 posts)
20. Actually, I think Rush is behind on this.
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 08:32 AM
Dec 2011

I have been hearing this around here since the buddy pack was announced. Nothing gets that ball of hatred rising like feeding the children at no cost to the taxpayer.

Riley18

(1,127 posts)
21. So free and reduced lunch is a national defense
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 01:59 PM
Dec 2011

item. Also, it helps agriculture profits. Anyone opposed is anti-business and basically anti-American.

underpants

(195,702 posts)
22. Exactly
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 02:41 PM
Dec 2011

and Big Agri is NOT going to allow anything to happen to this program. Most of the menu items are from the 4 major "subsidized" crops - wheat, soybeans, and of course CORN lots and lots of corn. The fourth by the way is cotton - they just haven't figured out how to pay off politicians to make it okay to sell food made of cotton....yet. I am sure they are working on it

Food Fight by Daniel Imhoff is a great read.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
23. No, but cotton is the reason that hemp is
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 03:24 PM
Dec 2011

Still not grown in America, even though everyone with a brain knows u can't get high off it.... However u can make durable clothes that last for years, unlike cotton products that will need to be re-bought more often.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
26. "Picking yourself up by your own bootstraps" is a perfect analogy for republicans.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 05:00 AM
Dec 2011

They love this saying. They honor it for the "rugged individualism" it engenders in their minds.

But I think it's a perfect analogy for them to hang their hats on for one simple reason:

It's impossible to do.

Fits them to a tee! The cornerstone of their belief system is represented by an analogy that is a factual impossibility. How perfectly appropriate.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
32. Not only that, the attempt will smash your face into the pavement - more fun for them.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 10:12 AM
Dec 2011

secondvariety

(1,245 posts)
34. I've wondered
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:09 PM
Dec 2011

if that pig actually believes the shit he spews or is he just pandering to the mouth breathers. Either way, it says something about America that he's so popular.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
38. he actually believes that particular shit. he's that 'popular' because they bought him a monopoly
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 05:42 PM
Dec 2011

and make sure he seldom gets real calls that would embarrass him. his show was given away to start his career and radio stations were bought up to put him on and protect him from competition. his stations are almost exclusively RW so he can't be contradicted on the same station. most of the other RW talkers get their material from the same think tanks to reinforce his lies and never contradict him.

he is a very talented liar and propagandist but contrary to popular opinion his 'popularity' is not the result of market forces- many of his stations are the loudest in every state and may often also broadcast university sports, traffic- local advertising is often making a business decision to go with the flow. he get the big bucks for selling war, global warming denial, deregulation tax breaks for billionaires, excuses for republicans, and political attack.

in most parts of the country there are NO free alternatives for politics while driving or working.

Lost-in-FL

(7,093 posts)
35. He's right. They should drug test children if they want pizza... err... healthy vegetables.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:18 PM
Dec 2011
 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
36. and to think many of our universities keep this guy fed by broadcasting sports on his radio stations
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 05:29 PM
Dec 2011

15 out of 16 NCAA bball finalists last year broadcast on his stations, essentially endorsing him.

many more in the US do the same. if any significant number were pressured to honor their mission statements, break those contracts and find alternatives, rush would take a major hit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rush Limbaugh Picks On Po...