General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaiting with bated breath. . .
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by hrmjustin (a host of the General Discussion forum).
. . . to see the intellectual contortions and twisted rationalizations the BOG will come up with to defend the Justice Department's attempts to seek immunify for BushCo.
hlthe2b
(113,973 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)BainsBane
(57,757 posts)I haven't been involved much in these Snowden/Manning issues, and I'm certainly not an apologist for governmental maleficence and NSA spying. I do have a couple of questions:
1)Do you all think that the government should keep no secrets and that no leaking of classified information should be prosecuted?
2) Given the disappointment many express toward Obama, to the point of calling him authoritarian and the US a police state, why would you think he would grant Manning a pardon?
Thanks!
markpkessinger
(8,912 posts)(1) Of course it is legitimate for government to try to keep some things secret. What is not legitimate is for a government to use classification for the purpose of prevent illegal and/or unconstitutional activities by the government from coming to light, or to prosecute and/or intimidate journalists for publishing such information when it comes to light.
(2) I never said I thought Obama would pardon Manning. I would certainly hope that he would, but I seriously doubt he will.
BainsBane
(57,757 posts)However Manning's document release was so extensive, it covered far more than illegal and unconstitutional activities.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Statement of Purpose
Discuss politics, issues, and current events. No posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports unless there is really big news. No conspiracy theories. No whining about DU.