Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 01:57 AM Aug 2013

US avoids 'red lines' after Syria chemical claims

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/US-avoids-red-lines-after-Syria-chemical-claims/articleshow/21969067.cms

The United States refused to set new "red lines" for Syria on Wednesday as claims of a horrific chemical arms strike reignited debate over Washington's reluctance to intervene in the civil war.

Claims by Syrian rebels that President Bashar al-Assad's forces massacred 1,300 people in a chemical weapons attack near Damascus sparked new pressure for action on Capitol Hill.

...

"I'm not talking about red lines. I'm not having a debate or conversation about red lines ... I'm not setting red lines," said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

The White House meanwhile refused to specify what, if any action Assad would face if it was proven that his forces were behind the attack in which many victims apparently choked to death.


What's the word for a situation with no good solutions?
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US avoids 'red lines' after Syria chemical claims (Original Post) Recursion Aug 2013 OP
There is no obvious solution LearningCurve Aug 2013 #1
 

LearningCurve

(488 posts)
1. There is no obvious solution
Thu Aug 22, 2013, 02:07 AM
Aug 2013

All possible responses have hazards. However, if you are going to draw a line in the sand, you have to be willing to respond if someone crosses it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US avoids 'red lines' aft...