General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWikipedia editors slug it out over Chelsea Manning
Well, you be the judge: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chelsea_Manning#top
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)She was Walter Carlos at one time, yet it doesn't seem like anyone (IMDb) has any issues with crediting her as Wendy Carlos today. Folks talked about it for a while, then settled into reality.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Wonderful soundtrack, brilliant really.
Silent3
(15,147 posts)...for my iTunes music collection, I took the time to use Photoshop to gather together bits and pieces of the lettering that read "Walter Carlos" and update it to say "Wendy".
joshcryer
(62,265 posts)Reading the thread it's clear that MOS:IDENTITY renders the discussion moot yet trolls keep repeating the same things, that she's biologically male, that the media has yet to refer to her as Chelsea, etc.
longship
(40,416 posts)Sorry for promoting my own thread. But I was watching France 24 tonight and they did a special segment on this very topic.
How to journalistically handle the Manning transgender issue?
Here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023523565
Wish there was video. Only my fuzzy report.
The take away is that whatever Chelsea Manning says she is, that's it. It is irresponsible reportage to portray her any other way.
This was a dynamite report. Wish there was video.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)that's just unacceptable.