General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn NPR the death toll from the Chemical weapons was 300. That's what eats me
...about this whole thing in Syria
If you're going to use a nuke, or anything close...you blow up 2 - 4 cities...and make sure to take military bases with them.
Otherwise, what gives with 300 people that aren't fighting!?
If I was AQ and wanted to carry on OBLs will of bleeding the US dry financially, I'd do something like gas a bunch of people of no military significance.
Please Mr president, consider the sources... this looks like a bunch of crap on the face of it..
Why would Assad now use chemical weapons when the conventional ones were working just fine?!
For what!?
No UN investigation on the chemical attack even though it was agreed upon here recently that would be done...even Russia agreed?
Don't trust any of that
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)It is more sensational that way and helps sell an even more sensational story - War!
Once again, the media is telling americans what they are supposed to be thinking.
FBaggins
(26,757 posts)That you think it didn't happen... Our that killing 300 people isn't all that big of a deal?
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)...or 30,000 with WMDs.
You're not trying to off a city block because the back lash will be overwhelming
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Which is the better way to die? (Rhetorical)
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)...only option is attacking
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)to kill many more with their weapons?