Post removed

[Iggo]

1. Oh, jeez!

[dionysus]

2. .

[Just Saying]

3. Could be the framing of the question that's part of the problem.

Starting off with name-calling doesn't illicit the best responses.

Yes, there are people here who are against all war. I think there's a larger group that is against war without very good reasons, a clear goal and legal authority. I'm in that group. I think the chemical weapon attack in Syria is awful but I'm not sure how our involvement helps the situation for civilians or punishes the attackers. Nor do I think it wise to take sides in their ugly civil war.

[Bluenorthwest]

6. The framing is not a problem for that message, it IS the message.

The name calling is intentional and also definitive of the respect given to the issue.

[rdharma]

4. How will starting a war with Syria provide us with an "Umbrella of Protection"?

[whttevrr]

5. Condescend much?

Are you just trolling for diatribe?

[quinnox]

7. wow, you are getting really obnoxious

I'll be surprised if you last much longer. Insulting almost all of Du is generally not a good idea.

[NightWatcher]

8. Good war-mongering democrats huh?

What happens when a country gets upset with our use of drones, DU, torture, rendition,.....?

[Hell Hath No Fury]

9. ...